.
Thanks,
Josh Smith
orola PtP links.
>
>
> --
> Bryan Fields
>
> 727-409-1194 - Voice
> 727-214-2508 - Fax
> http://bryanfields.net
>
>
While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti
equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's
which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now.
Thanks,
-- Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
> Combine that with the Linux/SDK stuff and you can do some interesting things
> with it that you can't do with other devices.
>
> - Jared
Jared,
I don't really have any experience with the Linux/SDK stuff care to
share what you're using it for?
Thanks,
--
Jos
+; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
>
>
Congratulations.
Hopefully this trial makes its way to the Morgantown, WV area sooner
rather than later (I'm not holding my breath) and I'll be able to
reach the ipv6 internet natively instead of over my HE tunnel.
Thanks,
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
ESX does NOT support LACP out of the box. Not sure about the nexus 1kv.
Thanks,
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Manu Chao wrote:
> I would like to design VSS LACP based MECs with ESX hosts.
>
> Does V
Can some from Comcast DNS contact me off list. A colleague made a mistake
in one of our DNS zones and the incorrect data is cached on your end and
causing our users fits.
Thanks,
Josh
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Could someone who has insight into DNS for it.colt.net please contact
me off list. I am having sporadic difficulty resolving a domain you
are providing DNS for.
Thanks
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
Seth,
What sort of ISP do your "not technically inclined" parents have that
offers native ipv6? :-)
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 2/3/11 7:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
I agree that setting up "local" connectivity between the folks in my
neighborhood wouldn't be too much of a challenge. Getting anything
much beyond that up and running would be a stretch.
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Josh Smith wrote:
>
>> I agree that setting up "local" connectivity between the folks in my
>> neighborhood wouldn't be too much of a challenge. Getting anything
>>
t;
>
>
Are you sure about that - I'm a comcast subscriber and see no signs
that I am being natted?
Thanks,
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
;
George,
Perhaps I misunderstood you - I am not behind any sort of large scale
NAT, however my CPE, self supplied router (actually an old sun blade
100 running openbsd) does provide nat for the other devices on my home
LAN.
Thanks,
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
phone: 304.237.9369(c)
t; part.
>> Networks that never touch the internet have RFC1918 address space to use.
>> (and that works 99.999% of the time.)
>>
>
> Except in acquisitions and private peering.
>
> as
Especially during acquisitions, my $EMPLOYEER has made several
acquisitions
13 matches
Mail list logo
