On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> >> wrote: >>> Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments along >>> these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB was coming out with >>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1814.txt. Given the publication of 1814, you >>> can probably guess how far those arguments fared. >> >> You missed the "anticipates external connectivity to the Internet" part. >> Networks that never touch the internet have RFC1918 address space to use. >> (and that works 99.999% of the time.) >> > > Except in acquisitions and private peering. > > as
Especially during acquisitions, my $EMPLOYEER has made several acquisitions recently and every one of them was wrought with painful RFC1918 overlap problems. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
