Jay, I previously ran the engineering org over there, so sent this to my old
team to look at, including the best engineer I know in regard to the RADs. Will
pass along anything they come back with.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Nov 6, 2020, at 8:59 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> We have a strange issue tha
David, reply to me off list and I will see if I can help you out.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Apr 19, 2023, at 9:21 AM, David Hubbard
> wrote:
>
> Have spent 90 minutes with tech support trying to get a peering issue a few
> hundred miles away in front of the right department, and all I have to show
Matt, I will ping you direct, but for the public audience, we had a hardware
issue this morning that was triggered during a config change on the peering
routers. Should be resolved here very shortly.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On May 2, 2016, at 4:47 AM, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> Is anyone else seeing m
Dennis, let me see if I can get someone to reach out to you to get this sorted
out. Can you PM me the circuit IDs and ASN/Prefix info please?
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Nov 20, 2023, at 9:53 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>
> I have two frontier circuits that are not working correctly with BGP,
> prefixes
I am. Shoot me a message offline on what you need and I can put you in contact
with our peering coordinator.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On May 20, 2024, at 5:21 AM, Nick Olsen wrote:
>
> Anyone with a clue from 5650 monitoring this list?
>
> I'm in the process of turning up a new transit circuit from 56
FYI, the 3rd edition was released early. Was delivered this morning from
Amazon. It has a whole new chapter on MPLS-TP (Ch. 17).
Hope this helps,
-Jeff
On Dec 26, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Brandon Kim wrote:
>
> Decisions decisions, I do have other MPLS books I have not finished. I
> suppose I can fi
Mike, nothing is perfect, so let's just start with that. What the FCC has done
to measure this is to partner with Sam Knows and then have friendly DSL subs
for the participating telcos to run modified CPE firmware to test against their
servers. We have been collecting data for this for the past
All excellent advice, but let me point out something else. I manage a team of
backbone engineers and still do quite a bit of engineering work myself. When I
interview, I never get caught up on certs or degrees. Now, do I ignore them?
No, of course not. They do mean something and I know I worked
While I would agree with that, having peering helps but certainly doesn't
replace a localized CDN. Certainly better than nothing though. It also of
course depends on the size of your network. If you are paying to carry that
traffic (leased backhaul, etc.) from your peering point to your customer
FWIW, when I took my JNCIE, I used all J-series running flow code (disabled)
for my study pod and never had any issues. I have 9 physical routers plus a
bunch of VRs on them. I agree there can be issues depending on what you are
trying to do, but I am not sure why this is such a big deal if this
All, I have reached out to Aaron privately for details, but we do not block
port 22 traffic unless it is in direct response to an attack or related item.
Please let me know directly if you have any specific questions.
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Mar 26, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Livingood, Jason
> wrote:
>
>
All it looks like I am seeing packet loss there across all of our peering
sessions with them, so looks like a problem on their network. I'll ask our NOC
to open up a ticket with them though just to see if we can find out what the
issue is.
Thanks,
-Jeff
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Warren Bai
Count me in as well. I ditched my personal Netscreens and replaced with SRXs
and we have done so as well at my day job. Other than a few quirky things, they
are very nice. V6 support is still somewhat limited though, but I am using an
SRX210H with ADSL2 PIM as my main router at home and it has b
I will admit I have the same issue with a both my BGP sessions over GRE as
well, which is really annoying, but I only use this for remote hopping over to
my other lab, not for anything I would ever do in production so I haven't
bothered opening a case on it yet. Glad to know I am not the only on
14 matches
Mail list logo