All it looks like I am seeing packet loss there across all of our peering sessions with them, so looks like a problem on their network. I'll ask our NOC to open up a ticket with them though just to see if we can find out what the issue is.
Thanks, -Jeff On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Warren Bailey <wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > There are some decent sized attacks taking place on gear near London, I > believe. Could be a result of that? > > > Sent from my Mobile Device. > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Janet Sullivan <jan...@nairial.net> > Date: 07/09/2013 5:01 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here? > > > I've been seeing really bad packet loss between PCCW and frontier, and so far > haven't been able to make any traction with anyone on either side. I'm > betting that the ??? is a peering point either in London or Ashburn. > > uk.bgp4.net (0.0.0.0) Tue Jul 9 20:39:53 2013 > Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields qu > it Packets Pings > Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev > 1. 212.111.33.230 0.0% 43 1.7 0.7 0.5 1.8 0.3 > 2. 212.111.33.237 0.0% 43 2.3 1.9 1.1 22.7 3.3 > 3. 63.218.13.221 0.0% 43 2.3 15.6 1.1 230.3 45.9 > 4. ??? > 5. 74.40.2.173 23.3% 43 177.9 150.3 147.8 177.9 7.0 > 6. 74.40.2.193 20.9% 43 149.9 149.9 149.1 161.2 2.1 > 7. 74.40.3.241 18.6% 43 149.6 152.4 149.1 193.2 8.8 > 8. 74.40.5.49 28.6% 43 148.1 150.8 147.8 192.1 9.9 > 9. 74.40.5.54 26.2% 43 148.3 150.5 147.9 218.7 12.6 > 10. 74.40.5.46 33.3% 42 149.5 154.0 149.2 212.8 14.0 > 11. 74.40.3.137 16.7% 42 147.4 148.7 146.9 163.0 4.1 > 12. 74.40.1.154 29.3% 42 148.2 153.6 147.7 206.7 14.2 > 13. 50.34.2.162 35.7% 42 150.2 150.4 149.8 156.3 1.2 > 14. 50.46.150.55 26.2% 42 150.7 151.0 150.5 152.0 0.4 >
