On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:28:30PM +, Tim Franklin wrote:
> Leaf-node BGP config is utterly trivial [...]
>
> The Enterprise guys really need to get out of the blanket "BGP is scary"
> mindset
It's not just "enterprise" mindset. Over the years I've seen a lot of
deployed gear that either di
[ Meant to send this to the list and not directly to Richard. ]
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:07:40AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> If any of you have any additional suggestions, you are more than
> welcome to share them.
I heard "hexquad" somewhere awhile back and have been using it since...
lo
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 08:52:42AM -0500, ML wrote:
> If you're only redistributing 10 prefixes into OSPF? Problem?
I know I'm a little late to this thread, but figured I'd point out one
reason why this can be very dangerous:
In IOS, you use a route-map to control redistribution between protocols
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:17:43AM -0400, Babak Pasdar wrote:
> Are there any resources (books, web sites, mailing lists, etc..) that
> anyone can recommend?
Richard Steenbergen did a nice preso on this subject a couple years ago:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog40/presentations/BGPcommunitie
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:38:38AM -0400, Dan Snyder wrote:
> We have done power tests before and had no problem. I guess I am looking
> for someone who does testing of the network equipment outside of just power
> tests. We had an outage due to a configuration mistake that became apparent
> when
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:45:07PM -0500, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
> There's more to data integrity in a data center (well, anything powered,
> that is) than network configurations.
Understood and agreed. My point was that induced failure testing isn't
the right way to catch incorrect or u
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 07:30:19AM -0700, Mike Maberry wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing connectivity issues to the internet using Time
> Warner/Road Runner in the Mid West? Kansas City and Wisconsin seem to be
> unable to access sites on the west coast...
Mike,
There is an ongoing issue that our op
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:34:16PM -0200, Nicolas Antoniello wrote:
> Sorry for my possible ignorance, but could you explain me what are you
> calling "transit-free"?
Transit-free means that you don't pay anyone else to reach some 3rd-party
network. In other words, if I'm Sprint, I don't pay UUNE
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:56:53AM -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
> > Also, why do we increase the UDP port number with each subsequent
> > traceroute packet that is sent?
>
> I don't know definitively, but I have an of educated guess
>From /usr/src/contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c:
/*
* Notes
*
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:51:20AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> m4 is a macro processor that you probably should not bother
> learning since you can do everything that it does by using Python
Oh, Abley is gonna have fun with this... and for the record, my money is
on Joe. He could probably
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:49:56PM -0600, ryanL wrote:
> should i be surprised that this hasn't been discussed much? anyone care to
> elaborate and/or expand on the real telecom damage done in japan?
What's to be surprised about? The US military is temporarily blocking
access to certain high-tra
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:14:13AM -0700, andrew.wallace wrote:
> This isn't the rhetoric of a super power, more like one of a university
> campus. [...] It strikes me straight away as amateurish to be blocking
> web sites in able to have enough bandwidth for operational purposes.
On the contrary,
12 matches
Mail list logo
