On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:45:07PM -0500, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote: > There's more to data integrity in a data center (well, anything powered, > that is) than network configurations.
Understood and agreed. My point was that induced failure testing isn't the right way to catch incorrect or unauthorized config changes, which is what I understood the original poster to have said was his problem. My apologies if I misunderstood what he was asking. > So while your analogy emphasizes the importance of having good processes in > place to catch the problems up front, it doesn't eliminate throwing the > switch. Yup, and it's precisely why I suggested using planned maintenance events as one way of doing at least limited failure testing. --Jeff
