In general I could I understand that, but it is my understanding that the
domain is still marked reserved at the Secretariat, which is to say they could
not have assigned any domains in it yet, even if they were inclined to which we
are told they are not.
In short, I think this is a possibilit
s.com/article/us-sudan-independence-idUSTRE75S4A520110629
>
>-Cynthia
>
>On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 12:17 PM Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>>
>> "Jay R. Ashworth" writes:
>>
>> > - Original Message -
>> > > From: "David Conrad&qu
Sure, but you imply that the proposed alternative=-going to permanent DST--is
only a trivial change to, and it is not. It violates the international rule
determining what your time zone should be based on what your longitude is.
That is not trivial.
On March 15, 2022 4:25:21 PM EDT, "james.cut
It has been bubbling under for some years-there are about I think it's 10 or 11
states which have already passed state laws changing it, pending that the
federal law blocking those be dropped-that's the Uniform Time Act of 1966 if I
have the title correct.
And to reply to somebody else his comm
S.623 as amended, literally hundreds of Tweets in the last 2 hours tell me.
Yeah, this just happened today. That would be why NPR lead with it on the 4
p.m. newscast.
On March 15, 2022 6:07:36 PM EDT, Matthew Petach wrote:
>Please provide a link documenting this claim.
>
>I have been reviewing
And here's the NPR story which leads with "the Senate passed a bill":
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/15/1086773840/daylight-saving-time-permanent-senate
I really don't know why that site does not list it, because it certainly
should. But here you are.
On March 15, 2022 6:07:36 PM EDT, Matthew Peta
General press loses its *mind*:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/earth-spinning-faster-than-usual-shortest-day-ever/#app
Have you tested leap second handling, especially in reverse? How do you
simulate it? Are there existing test harnesses for simulating it?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Sent from my Androi
I wouldn't have thought that Frontier was able to offer dark fiber, since air
distribution fan out is all GPON, is it not?
If their fanout was active ethernet it might be a different story but...
Cheers,
-- jra
On July 13, 2022 7:40:47 AM EDT, Mike Hammett wrote:
>I'm looking for a contact at
iginal Message-
>From: NANOG On Behalf Of Stephane
>Bortzmeyer
>Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 11:19 AM
>To: Jay Ashworth
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond...
>
>On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:09:25AM -0400, Jay Ashworth
>wr
You might recommend that to me if running DNS tunnelled through another
protocol was a thing I wanted to do.
But it's not. I think it's horrible Internet engineering hygiene, and I don't
just not want to do it myself, I don't think anybody else ought to do it
either.
And I think that if end-
Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for Registries to
deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams of complaints.
On July 4, 2016 2:35:37 PM EDT, Mel Beckman wrote:
>I've worked behind the scenes for more than one of these outfits. I can
>tell you that dom
Just a quick clarifying reply, I have had DSL test give me an A for bufferbloat
and a C for Speed on a 75 Meg line.
On July 22, 2016 3:23:00 PM EDT, Jim Gettys wrote:
>I don't read this list continually, but do archive it; your note was
>flagged for me to comment on.
>
>On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8
The inventor of NTP, in the late 1970s, and recipient of the 2013 IEEE Internet
Award “for significant leadership and sustained contributions in the research,
development, standardization, and deployment of quality time synchronization
capabilities for the Internet”, Dr. David Lennox Mills died
It's making the general press this hour so of course you already know about it
but my question is this: who peers with meta and have you seen BGP sessions
drop or the like? Do you operate meta CDN nodes in your network? Are they
screaming for help?
This doesn't sound like it's a network layer
Yes: metastatus.com
It isn't happy.
On March 5, 2024 11:23:42 AM EST, "Kain, Becki (.)" wrote:
>Does meta keep a board somewhere to tell the world it’s down?
>
>From: NANOG On Behalf Of Jay Ashworth
>Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2024 11:06 AM
>To: nanog@nanog.org
&g
Steve Bellovin retires:
https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@SteveBellovin/112362015712050310
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
We have a report on outages that he.net has been placed in ICANN client hold,
and people's DNS service is falling over on this Independence day. If you work
in DNS for HE, you might want to look into this.
I have double checked the report, and I am seeing the status as well.
Hurricane serves lo
eir support when that outage thread came in, they're already aware
>and taking a look now.
>
>Ryan Hamel
>
>
>From: NANOG on behalf of Jay
>Ashworth
>Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 11:55 AM
>To: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: HE.net problem
I've been informed that the CEO of HE is on this as of 1512EDT.
I approve of the scale of this response. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
On July 4, 2024 2:55:34 PM EDT, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>We have a report on outages that he.net has been placed in ICANN client hold,
>and people's DNS se
See how little it has been necessary for me to pay attention to them since my
net handle was assigned back in the early 90s or maybe late 80s? ;-)
Cheers,
-- jra3
On July 6, 2024 11:11:50 AM EDT, John Levine wrote:
>According to Jay R. Ashworth :
>>data I heard that that *was* a registry-side
I have seen a number of versions of that in reading things people sent me and
things I found myself, and all of them seem to depend on ASICs that didn't
exist at the time the ranges were chosen, and probably also CIDR which also
didn't exist. They sound good, but I'm not buying em. :-)
On Octob
No, I'm pretty sure he means "across the 2 high legs of a 120/208 3ph
Wye service", and I'd never heard that idea suggested before. I can see
why it reduces the amount of copper you need to run, but it seems as if
it would have compensating disadvantages, though I can't think precisely
what they
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Day"
>
> On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > It is not uncommon for three-phase panels to be different and have
> > all three phases in the panel each phase feeding every third breaker
> > slot.
>
> I was just recently trying to explain
- Original Message -
> From: "Leo Bicknell"
>[...]
> That's an interesting number, but let's run back the other way.
> Consider what happens if folks cut the cord, and watch Internet
> only TV. I went and found some TV ratings:
>
> http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/11/30/tv-ratings-b
- Original Message -
> From: "Ingo Flaschberger"
>
> in europe GFIs are always needed for prection and by law.
> to avoid the cascading effects the GFCIs are better.
> break current ranges from 10mA (bath) up to 300mA; for servers I use
> the 30mA with pulse protection (internal delay) to
- Original Message -
> From: "Jack Bates"
>
> What would be really awesome (unless I've missed it) is Internet
> access to the emergency broadcast system and local weather services; all
> easily handled with multicast.
Ah, something I know something about for a change. :-)
In fact, ther
- Original Message -
> From: "Antonio Querubin"
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > Oh: and all the extra servers and switches necessary to set that up?
>
> > *Way* more power than the equivalent transmitters and TV sets. Even
> > if
- Original Message -
> From: "Antonio Querubin"
>
> Yep I just did the same check. I think the delisting may have applied
> to specific models from specific manufacturers. I just don't see UL
> delisting all GFCI breakers.
Clearly, some intermediate gateway set the evil bit on Steven's me
- Original Message -
> From: "Ricky Beam"
>
> Just because someone is selling them doesn't mean they meet building
> codes. (esp. for residential use.) None of the dozen or so licensed
> electricians I've ever talked to will use them.
The breakers, I assume you mean.
> None of my local L
- Original Message -
> From: "Ryan Finnesey"
>
> I have TWC in NYC. I see now I can restart most of the shows I watch.
> How is this done?
On digital cable systems, it's because your cable box is now really a
GoogleTV/Rokubox like thing that only looks like a "cable converter".
You tell
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Ferguson"
>
> >>> As to the emergency broadcast system, yeah, that's going to lose.
> >>
> >> Didn't we already replace that with twitter?
> >
> > quake/tsunami warnings flow via email rather quickly.
>
> Old skool.
>
> Twitter is much faster:
>
> http
Original Message -
> From: "Gary Buhrmaster"
>
> A protective trip is better than the alternative.
This depends on what you're optimising for; google "battle short" for
more on that.
Cheers,
-- jra
This came up in another thread yesterday or today, and I just got the
solicitation mailer for Clearwire's WiMAX service in Tampa Bay, which they
call "4G", though the ITU disagrees.
The AUP is here: http://www.clear.com/legal/aup
and while it really doesn't have any hidden limits (which is good,
I'm trying to get my sister's MythTV DVR to send her a daily email with its
recording schedule. Earthlink is apparently blocking the email because it's
coming from a dynamic address -- even though that address *is an Earthlink
cablemodem*.
Is there anyone from Earthlink email ops around who can c
- Original Message -
> From: "Blake Dunlap"
>
> > I don't know why this should be especially surprising. They probably
> > use RBL's, etc, just like everybody else and I doubt the RBL cares
> > whether the source is earthlink vs. earthlink's address space.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be easier to
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Stange"
>
> > People are still feeding their gear with AC? Save on PS inefficiency,
> > and feed direct 12/5vDC to the servers. Save space, save power,
> > save cooling.
>
> If you're already in a datacenter, getting 208V AC from an existing AC
> infras
- Original Message -
> From: "Jima"
>
> On 12/3/2010 9:25 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> > (OK, so it's not as practical when you have other customers to worry
> > about... but it might not be so crazy when you're looking at the
> > efficiency numbers for 100,000 small 1u power supplies vs a
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Loftis"
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > And in fact, much carrier class equipment can be had with -48V
> > power, there are ATX and similar power supplies for PCs that are -48, and I
&
- Original Message -
> Level 3 is functioning not only as a transport provider for smaller
> content providers, but also as an aggregated negotiation service,
> though in this case the content provider, Netflix, is big enough to
> matter. (Some years ago, when they were DVDs by mail only, i
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
>
> On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:24:46 EST, Bret Clark said:
> > On 12/04/2010 06:03 PM, Ken Gilmour wrote:
> > > Now Sarah Palin is suggesting Wikileaks are terrorists and should
> > > be taken offline with technical capabilities
>
> > Enough alr
Original Message -
> From: "Adrian Chadd"
>
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:
> > And if they come and ask the same but without a court order is a bit
> > trickier and more confusing, and this list is a good place to track the
> > frequency of and responce to that kind of request.
Original Message -
> From: "Jared Mauch"
> Anyone done this dynamic synthesis w/ bind? dnssec thoughts as well? i
> know this isn't namedroppers, but perhaps someone can post some code
> or examples, or a link to a webpage with them?
Earthlink, I believe; DENTS has a module for doing th
- Original Message -
> From: "George Bonser"
> If monopolies are needed in order to get service to an area, make them
> "last mile" wire monopolies that provide no content of their own and
> allow the content providers (Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, etc.) provide
> service over the infrastructur
- Original Message -
> From: "Alex Rubenstein"
> -- Alex, remembering the days of 8000 ISP's with substantially better
> customer service than is available today
In 1995, when I was the chief engineer for a teeny little ISP called
Centurion Technologies, in Largo FL (we had 40 modems here
- Original Message -
> From: "JC Dill"
> If I drive from SF to LA for business or for personal purposes, my costs
> for the drive are the same. But the economy of doing it for business
> depends on what the client is willing to pay me. If they want me to
> drive to LA but only pay $10, it'
- Original Message -
> From: "JC Dill"
> > see also my running rant about Verizon-inspired state laws
> > *forbidding*
> > municipalities to charter monopoly transport-only fiber providers,
> > renting
> > to all comers on non-discriminatory terms, which is the only
> > practical
> > way I
- Original Message -
> From: "Brian Rettke"
> Interesting point. I'd also like to point out that putting the cost on
> the content providers rather than the network may raise the cost of
> the content service, but only to those that want that service. In
> effect, if the transport provide
- Original Message -
> From: "JC Dill"
> What customers *really* want, and what they gladly accept as long as
> it saves them a few pennies, are miles apart. (Which is why so many
> people blindly give their data to Facebook etc.) This is why I think the
> direction Comcast is going is ul
- Original Message -
> From: "George Bonser"
> Turn the question around. What would any provider think if a city said
> "sure, you can have access to our residents' eyeballs. It will cost
> you $5 per subscriber per month". Would Comcast or anyone go for that?
> That is a real question, b
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Haninger"
> To: "Joe Blanchard"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:28:47 AM
> Subject: Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Joe Blanchard
> wrote:
>
> > It appears there's really no easy wa
Original Message -
> From: "JC Dill"
> On 17/12/10 4:54 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> > I do believe that video over the Internet is about to change the
> > cable business in a very deep and possibly traumatic way.
>
> +1
>
> It's clear that this is a major driving factor in th
This is entirely off topic, except that this is the audience who will know
off hand.
Now that 2TB costs $100, has anyone solicited Google for a copy of the
Historical Usenet Archives that were assembled by they and Dejanews,
such that this history lives in someplace... less commercial? Like
the
- Original Message -
> From: "Leo Bicknell"
> After looking at many models I think Australia might be on to
> something. The model is that a quasi-government monopoly provides
> the last mile physical wire, but is unable to sell services on it.
> Basically they only provide UNE's. Then, a
- Original Message -
> From: "JC Dill"
> On 19/12/10 8:31 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Look up pictures of New York City in the early days of electricty.
> > There were streets where you couldn't hardly see the sky because of
> > all
> > the wires on the poles.
> >
> Can you provide a link
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Bonomi"
> "Overbuild" is practical *ONLY* where: (a) the population density is
> high,lowering 'per customer' costs, and (b) service 'penetration' is high
> enough that the active subscriber base (as distinct from 'potential'
> subscribers) sufficient
I was poking around to see what the current received wisdom was as to
average install cost per building for suburban municipal home-run fiber,
and ran across this article, which discusses the topic, and itemizes
several large such deployments that "failed" or had to be sold private.
I'd be inter
- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Larson"
> The new KSK will not be published in an authenticated manner outside
> DNS (e.g., on an SSL-protected web page). Rather, the intended
> mechanism for trusting the new KSK is via the signed root zone: DS
> records corresponding to the new KSK ar
- Original Message -
> From: "John Osmon"
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:17:46AM -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> [...]
> > The fact that I can get a wavelength to county dump in Eugene OR the
> > composting facility in Palo Alto doesn't really do anything for the
> > residential access market.
- Original Message -
> From: "Nathan Eisenberg"
> I got a chuckle out of this:
> "Provo County’s iProvo was hoping for 10,000 subscribers by July 2006
> with the assumption that 75% of those customers would subscribe to
> lucrative triple play services, but the reality was 10,000 customer
- Original Message -
> From: "Frank Bulk - iName.com"
> Uhm, D-CATV is not IP just quite yet. Sometimes I wish that's the
> case, but it's still very much RF.
>
> There are several vendors that sell GPON solutions that support RF
> over fiber, and there's always IP TV.
Hmm. I had acqui
- Original Message -
> From: "Matt Larson"
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > > From: "Matt Larson"
> >
> > > The new KSK will not be published in an authenticated manner
> > > outside DNS (e.g., on an SSL-pr
- Original Message -
> From: "Florian Weimer"
> > That sounds like a policy decision... and I'm not sure I think it sounds
> > like a *good* policy decision, but since no reasons were provided, it's
> > difficult to tell.
>
> I don't know if it influenced the policy decision, but as it is
- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Mauch"
> During the northeast power outage the biggest local problem was
> inability to pump gas out of underground tanks. The margin at the
> stations is low enough it's not worth it to have generators. Best off
> having the pipeline next to you and to
- Original Message -
> From: "Doug Barton"
> Now OTOH if someone wants to demonstrate the value in having a
> publication channel for TLD DNSKEYs outside of the root zone, I'm
> certainly willing to listen. Just be forewarned that you will have an
> uphill battle in trying to prove your c
Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Oberman"
> There is no reason that you could not do OOB transfers of keys, but it
> would be so cumbersome with the need to maintain keys for every TLD
> (and, for that matter, every zone under them) and deal with key rolls
> at random intervals and conf
Bill Manning saith:
> who intimated that the OOB channel would be http? since that is based
> on the DNS, i'd like to think it was suspect as well. :)
No it's not, Bill, not *necessarily*; you know better than that. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
Here, for those who were involved in the "is that a picture of Manhattan
with multiple phone companies" debate last week, is a link to the first
of a series of linked blog posts, which contain a lot of those pics,
somewhat better cited than I've seen before, along with a large collection
of "than
- Original Message -
> From: "Jo Rhett"
> On Nov 25, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Have you tried 611 (from an AT&T land-line phone)?
>
> Many people don't have one. I haven't had one for over 12 years now,
> nor have any of my employers for the last 8 years.
For what its w
This is admittedly a touch end-usery, my apologies...
I'm looking into satellite-based 2-way IP transport, on the scale of
SCPC DVB-RCS or iDirect, as an adjunct to the already installed
"traditional" one-way satellite gear installed in the Frontline DSNG
truck owned by my new employer, both for
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:06:32 EST, Kelly Olsen said:
> > That would only happen with an outrageously over-subscribed
> > provider.
>
> OK - I'll feed the troll. What's the proper amount of unused and therefor
> non-revenue-generating capac
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
> So what you're saying is that after a Kyoto/Chile sized quake, or a
> Katrina, or a Quebec 1990 ice storm, you can *guarantee* that you can
> still fill all requests for transponder space, and *still* satisfy every
> single customer who w
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
> > Why the hostility, Valdis?
>
> As I said several times - it's not hard to be 98% or 99% sure you can make
> all your commitments. However, since predicting the future is an inexact
> science,
> it's really hard to provide a *100% guaran
The holiday is today, according to holidayinsights.com
http://www.holidayinsights.com/moreholidays/January/squirrelappreciation.htm
Did anyone ever do the scope-sight T-shirt? No, wait; that was a backhoe.
Cheers,
-- jra
- Original Message -
> From: "Gary Buhrmaster"
>
> Most of the "brand name" GPS NTP solutions have a clock
> with is more than stable enough to survive without GPS
> lock for 45 minutes(*). Some of the more expensive units with
> temperature controlled oscillators have hold times in the
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Brian Johnson"
> I really wish people would keep their personal/political bias outside
> the list unless it is specific and relevant. What other "main-stream"
> news organization has made any reports on this issue?
>
> To be clear, FOX screwed this up big ti
[ Sorry; forgot to address this to the list, earlier. ]
- Original Message -
> From: "Brian Johnson"
> I'm a bit torn on this issue. I haven't even heard any other
> "main-stream" sources say anything on this topic. But Incorrect info
> is bad too.
>
> I hope the viewers who watched thi
Let me clarify:
The original question was (so far as I could see): "Was Fox making up the
quote where Vint took the blame for IPv4 exhaustion?"
The answer, of course, was "no, they didn't; lots of people have the quote".
I wasn't speaking to the technical details of the actual piece, which,
clea
- Original Message -
> From: "John Bashinski"
> Well, this has generated some interesting messages, and apparently
> some people think that the "large router vendor" in question should
> speak for itself.
Yay!
> Realities
> =
> 5. Some of the people installing these products (fr
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> > Fox didn't screw up, for a change, and Vint's quote appears in many
> > other news sources. Apparently, I'm the only one on Nanog who knows
> > about this new thing called The Google. :-)
> >
> I don't think Vint's quote was the part where we
- Original Message -
> From: "Chris Grundemann"
> Perhaps instead of trying to do this as a new independent activity
> (with
> all of the difficulties that entails), the community would be better
> served
> by documenting this information as a BCOP or two or three???
>
> >>> http://bcop.
I wonder if they'll break BCP 38... or vice-versa...
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/01/bewifi-lets-you-steal-your-neighbors-bandwidth-when-theyre-not-using-it/
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> On Jan 26, 2014, at 16:04 , Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> > I wonder if they'll break BCP 38... or vice-versa...
> >
> > http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/01/bewifi-lets-you-steal-your-ne
- Original Message -
> From: "John R. Levine"
> The customer continues to whine about performance. Our ISP says, ah, you
> need our Preferred Thoughput Upgrade Innovation (PTUI), available at
> modest extra cost. The extra cost, of course, it what it costs to buy
> a /24 and get the custo
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> > Unless I misread the piece, Pat, they *do* intend for customers to
> > mesh non-Telefonica links, which is half of your answer.
>
> I guess we read it differently.
>
> They even mention "Telefonica is currently looking towards develo
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
> I guess we read it differently.
[ rereads ]
I'm wrong; you win; shut up. :-)
I did find *this* amusing, though:
"""
Another unexpected finding was that people do not use the Internet heavily all
at exactly the same time—a concern a
Tracking a really world-class AT&T fiber outage in MD:
> > Our AT&T service delivery manager just updated the list for us:
> >
> > · 7 OC192s
> > · 7 OC48
> > · 22 Core T3/DS3s
> > · 8 additional T3/DS3s
[ Apologies for the lack of attribution; they fell apart while I was
trying to clip the quo
- Original Message -
> From: "joel jaeggli"
> > I thought "Twinax" was an IBMish MILSPEC term.
>
> twinax could refer to a specific technology or to the presence of dual
> inner conductors e.g. in contrast to coax or triax.
Rather specifically, Twinax refers to cable with 2 center condu
- Original Message -
> From: "Cb B"
> I completely agree. My sphere of influence is bcp38 compliant. And,
> networks that fail to support some form of bcp38 are nothing short of
> negligent.
>
> That said, i spend too much time taking defensive action against ipv4 amp
> udp attacks. And
- Original Message -
> From: "Glen Turner"
> On 4 Feb 2014, at 9:28 am, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> > wait, so the whole of the thread is about stopping participants in
> > the attack, and you're suggesting that removing/changing end-system
> > switch/routing gear and doing somethin
- Original Message -
> From: "Jared Mauch"
> Ask your vendors for these features. Ask them to fix the bugs. The
> ball rolls uphill here and it's in their lap. Blaming the carriers is
> wrongheaded and putting it where it doesn't belong in many cases.
> Happy to discuss offline.
I phrase
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
> Can somebody explain to me why those who run eyeball networks are able
> to block outbound packets when the customer hasn't paid their bill,
> but can't seem to block packets that shouldn't be coming from that
> cablemodem?
The purported
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Ferguson"
> > (And yes, I know that in the first case, it urges the customer to
> > cough up the bucks, and in the second case, it's usually not a
> > revenue generator)
>
> It's a dichotomy that is... unexplainable for me personally.
Nope: it's easy t
- Original Message -
> From: "John Levine"
> Subject: Re: BCP38 is hard, was TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?
> >Why does it have to be hard? Restricting the filter to addresses
> >which
> >(A) the customer asserts are theirs
>
> How does the customer do that in a way that scales?
>
> I
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/02/05/272015606/sniper-attack-on-calif-power-station-raises-terrorism-fears
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
- Original Message -
> From: "Octavio Alvarez"
> Maybe I'm oversimplifying things but I'm really curious to know why
> can't the nearest-to-end-user ACL-enabled router simply have an ACL to
> only allows packets from end-users that has a valid source-address
> from the network segment the
- Original Message -
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
> Time to name-and-shame. It's 2014. Who's still shipping gear that
> can't manage eyeball-facing BCP38?
It sure is.
POLL: If you run "eyeball" equipment -- edge concentrators/routers/CMTSen,
would you please post, without employer a
- Original Message -
> From: "Frank Bulk"
> Here's such a report:
>
> http://spoofer.cmand.org/summary.php
And those results aren't bad; they amount to between 2/3 and 3/4 of
real source address space already having something implemented, if I'm
reading them correctly.
Cheers,
-- jra
- Original Message -
> From: "joel jaeggli"
> > As I've noted, I'm not sure I believe that's true of current generation
> > gear, and if it *is*, then it should cost manufacturers business.
>
> There are boxes that haven't aged out of the network yet where that's an
> issue, some are mor
Sure. Part of the data collection task. Making sure all the current new gear
knows how, still a good idea.
On February 5, 2014 11:32:26 PM EST, Mark Tinka wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:24:42 PM Jay Ashworth
>wrote:
>
>> As I've noted, I'm not sure
I'm going to be somewhat of a pain in everybody's ass this year, pounding on
the drum whenever the topic pops up. :-)
On February 5, 2014 11:38:08 PM EST, Mark Tinka wrote:
>On Thursday, February 06, 2014 06:34:16 AM Jay Ashworth
>wrote:
>
>> Sure. Part of the data
1 - 100 of 1312 matches
Mail list logo
