Re: Why are paper LOAs still used?

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 1:20 PM Joe via NANOG wrote: > > One thing that I recently read on this mailing list, is that at least in the > US, a transmitting a fraudulent LOA is a federal crime - wire fraud. [0] > Being able to hopefully charge and convict someone performing fraud is a > useful det

Re: puck not responding

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:22 AM Jared Mauch wrote: > Apparently some of the most important email lists, Outages, etc, are being kept online by 1 person's Unix/Linux server. Thank you greatly for your service Regards, -- -J

Re: registry for onmicrosoft[dot]com

On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 8:11 AM Travis Garrison wrote: > > This would be a company that has registered for an office365 account. > Office 365 company accounts are registered as companyname [dot] onmicrosoft > [dot] com. The "companyname" part is evidently Not reliable. Often the name [dot] on

Re: Microsoft missing public DNS TXT entry for DKIM records (msn.com)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:23 AM Adam Brenner via NANOG wrote: .. > It seems to me that if msn.com is going to include DKIM headers in their > outgoing email, they should also publish their DKIM public key. If they > are not going to publish their DKIM public key, then they should not > include DKIM

Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

A /64 is not "enough" period. Each IPv6 /64 should be thought of as the same as an IPv4 /32. The RFC is still relevant. You are able to be allocated IPs justifying 8-bits per customer (/56) and customers should expect that /56 be the minimum delegated by their providers. The prefix delegation fo

Re: etiquette for replying to daily digests

On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 4:46 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > It’s been decades since the last time I used this option.. and that was on > an actual listserv run on lsoft.com, early 2000s. > Yes.. Digest modes are generally unsuitable for active participation in a mailing list. I think the ent