ork capacity
is available.
Is that something feasible at a decent price ?
I've read that Broadcom' StrataDNX (Qumran / Jericho) chips have OTN
support in addition to ethernet now, is there some vendor who leverages
this, preferably with OCP gear ?
Thanks !
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
We're not really working on the optical side of things, it's really just
about replacing Ethernet wherever it's relevant. Regionnal to long-haul
P2P links for that matter.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
ces, with OSC and every muxponded ODU as sub-interfaces, and a
new type of bridge to patch them to other ODUs or map them to ethernet
service ports… Every sub-if having SNMP OIDs for load, FEC reporting and
latency measurement.
I hope it's a bit more clear now ?
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
, running Cumulus Linux (or equivalent) with
OTN+MEF extensions (also SRv6 to build a terastream-like network) on
broadcom-based OCP switches would be far more efficient and versatile.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
could bridge the gap, allowing for a more
efficient use of optical bandwidth.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
twork to fit functional needs or is technology still a
barrier to efficient use-cases ?
As an optimist, I chose the former, and love to engage in such debates
with my peers, as long as I can avoid backward-thinking "We've always
done it that way" assertions.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
of the largest networks are already
working on it, but it's "classified material" for now. I may as well
postpone my deployment waiting for their R&D to be contributed to the
OCP project, but I'd rather contribute instead.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
ld we deal with that ? Is there an "off-market" offering for
higher speed interconnects ?
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
com/products/33364.html
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
e we have
to maintain.
But I cleraly won't stand for an alternative to traditionnal offerings
just yet : it's too critical, and it's a PITA to build from scratch and
scale.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
Hi Ronald,
>From your initial list, I can still see some prefixes with the NLnog ring :
http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=206.41.128.0
http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=52.128.192.0
http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_bgpmap/lg01/ipv4?q=206.222.128.0
Also http://lg.
Hi Jack,
Le 05/08/2018 à 21:51, na...@jack.fr.eu.org a écrit :
> By "appropriate place", you mean "the trash bin" ?
Nope, that would eat-up storage and IOs. The proper destination is
/dev/null, unless they provide you with the required informations to
send a bill.
Be
one to another.
If you have any right to give them a finger, please, on behalf of our
community, give it to them. If not, please work harder on denouncing
those indecent contracts.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
4)
and are rarely polarization neutral, meaning a DP-QPSK coherent optic
cannot be used.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
pointer or references ?
Thanks !
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
'd host their gear or provide VMs for them to announce
on the local route-servers ? If not, what could be a reasonable
technical arrangement ?
Thanks !
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
e issues to any content provider, not just for
local ISPs.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
enarii should be on a research roadmap by
SpaceX' standards, right ? ;-)
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
is supposedly sending pre-loaded servers, and I think
that - in this location - it's gonna mean a lot already. The quastion is
: how would the servers peer with local ISPs.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
d a way to make it work and as to
meet extra requirements upon redundancy.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
*flow at line rate
I wouldn't load one to 80g, but at 10-20G, it creates no bottleneck.
The entire packet-pipeline is in software. IPFIX is not sampled, it's
1:1 only AFAIK. It's also lacking some features, meaning you'd need to
filter through pmacct to add BGP informations.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
ming as well as a
complex VPLS fabric.
This design is operating consistently on the Toulouse Internet Exchange
since 2015 using Pica8's gear.
So maybe a CLI and feature-full NOS will better suit your needs, but for
an IXP, the programmatic approach has demonstrated to be working just fine.
Bes
OpenFlow messages to push
such filters to member ports ? Would there be any smat way to do that on
non-OpenFlow enabled dataplanes (C6k...) ?
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
bugs.
I'd rather consider implementing ACLs on member ports to filter-out
illegitimate prefixes (cannot do OpenFlow on cheap L2 switches :( )
rather than making BCP38 compliance mandatory.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
Le 28/02/2014 17:00, Jay Ashworth a écrit :
>> From: "Jérôme Nicolle"
>> Instead, IXPs _could_ enforce BCP38 too. Mapping the route-server's
>> received routes to ingress _and_ egress ACLs on IXP ports would mitigate
>> the role of BCP38 offenders within me
Hi Randy,
Le 28/02/2014 17:15, Randy Bush a écrit :
> clearly you have not been reading this list for very long
Well... Busted. All things considered, there surelly has been more
stupid proposals.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
if a member provides transit, he will add its
customer prefixes to RaDB / RIPEdb with appropriate route objects and
the ACL will be updated accordingly. Shouldn't break there.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
twork (no presence on public IXPs, poor
transits...), renumbering critical services (DNS, MX, extranets) to
one of their /24s and de-aggregating it could be a smart move.
- --
Jérôme Nicolle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbi
op. Just because you have a reason does not make it OK.
> And even when it is a good idea, most people implement it so poorly
> as to cause unneeded harm.
Alright, let's implement new policies at a RIR, IXPs and T1s levels to
forbid anyone from de-agregation without no-exports. Culprits would fall
under a three-strike policy before definitive de-peering and public
humiliation. Who's with me ? :)
--
Jérôme Nicolle
surface.
Did anyone see such a tool ?
Thanks !
--
Jérôme Nicolle
has been
cathed doing nasty things AND didn't comply to abuse@ requests.
But most RBL managers are shitheads anyway, so help them evade,
that'll be one more proof of spamhaus &co. uselessness and negative
impact on the Internet's best practices.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
to
consider SMTP administration seriously rather than using default
settings from the package maintainer...
--
Jérôme Nicolle
hose who performs thorough checks _before_ putting a legitimaite mail
server in a blacklist, then i'd enjoy benchmarking it on a test
domain. Just let me doubt it'll be of any good regarding how
efficients is a properly managed mail server with just a few tech
tricks.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
06 19 31 27 14
he use of RBLs and still provide a goode
quality of service. It probably won't scale to comcast' or AOL' MXs
but it's way better than relying on an external authority for your
corporate or personnal mailserver.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
ing about amateurs using RBLs
as a pre-processing hard filter. Using it with a scoring system isn't
bad IMHO, depends on the weight you set to these rules.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
ard time reading "hey, my critical
services are dependant of an external, centralized entity with no
transparency and that's good for the Internet" without compulsive
expressions including F. words.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
.
> I have tried the freebsd net mailinglist, but im hoping you lot can help me!
>
> Cheers in advance
> Will
>
> - End forwarded message -
> --
> Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
> __________
> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
> 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
>
>
--
Jérôme Nicolle
06 19 31 27 14
s) helps avoiding these risks and yet lets you
roughly balance load to several gateways.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
r networks and how
can this issue be regulated (either by common sense or law).
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
to
take a stand and vote policies to reclaim address space from networks
who are still not deploying IPv6 as those obviously don't want to be a
part of the Internet anymore.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
r such lenghts, you may need a chromatic dispersion
compensator.
[1] http://www.thorlabs.de/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=373
--
Jérôme Nicolle
06 19 31 27 14
a commercial service from
Orange / France Telecom (wich is selling AS3215 transit and peering there).
--
Jérôme Nicolle
06 19 31 27 14
Le 15/03/12 07:59, Randy Bush a écrit :
> and i have configured two home LANs to use it
So wrong...
--
Jérôme Nicolle
ts).
If you just want to get a BGP feed for studies and statistics, with no
forwarding involved, I guess I'd be willing to participate (AS197422).
But an eBGP multihop session is enough, no need for a tunnel there.
> And willing to allocate you space for same?
Isn't any RIR memeber list
is on AS1660 and the route breaks within
AS701.
Could anyone confirm the reachability for this prefix from the US ?
Anyone at Verizon to check and fix if necessary ?
Thanks !
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
Le 02/04/2012 20:03, Schiller, Heather A a écrit :
>
> Sent response offlist.
Thanks a lot for your answers, got a few hints to nail it ;)
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
This device does it all :)
several models and options are available, ranging from $3k to $8k AFAIK.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
outside of GUA, ULA our LLA scopes to avoid bug-hunting on poorly
implemented IPv6 stacks.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
best practice, and could be
considered a requirement enforced by transit providers. Or shouldn't it ?
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
x27;t read
specs and SNMP, you shouldn't even try networking) ?
Did you ever experience a shift in a vendor's position regarding the use
of compatible modules ?
Thanks !
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
uld be
reached. Salesmen on the other hand have their own interest in both
selling OEM modules to the corporate market, and unlocked equipments to
the SP/telco market, to whom they won't sell anything otherwise.
Is it unrealistic to hope for enough salesmen pressure on the corporate
ladder to make such moronic attitude be reversed in the short term ?
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
Le 17/11/2014 21:09, ryanL a écrit :
> kinda wish they had a similar undocumented command.
Well, there is a command, and you can automate it's application.
See https://gist.github.com/agh/932bbd1f74d312573925 .
Can't tell if DOM is supported on 3rd party.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
ed manufacturers.
It's probably fine in a pure DC environment with few locations and only
one SFP+ type, but it's rapidly a total mess when you have to manage 40
channels for 3 module types over dozens of locations AND the added
manufacturer specific pain-in-the-ass.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
d network just yet, mostly for the lack of enough personnal
confidence and experience with them, but havin endured nights of
debugging with poor quality code in recent major player's routers, I
doubt they're as misfits as you suggest.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
vertheless, if you want do get deeper and have enough motivation to
get past the technical difficulties, I'd gladly try to help into
bringing an alternative OS to these box.
Best regards,
- --
Jérôme Nicolle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GP
t past 5+ chassis)
On the financial aspects, well, it's surprisingly cheap as soon as you
have to scale past the chinese pizabox OLTs. Over 9 trees out of a
single PoP, you're definitely more effective with such devices.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
uters isn't a reliable metric
(still a usefull indicator, YMMV)
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
Le 28/01/2016 01:51, Baldur Norddahl a écrit :
> Will we also get 2.5 Gbps fiber optics? SFP modules should support it?
Why wouldn't you go straight to 10G ?
--
Jérôme Nicolle
Gbps circuits per PoP.
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
PE router, because ALU's
FANT-F card lacks EoMPLS/ATOM/VPLS/E-VPN capabilities. I only use QinQ
on its 4*10Gbps uplink ports.
Any 80Gbps capable PE router would be fine, though. I choose the
Mikrotik CRR1072 for its price and density.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
ility over a shared and
common immaterial resource, between community members.
I'm wondering how did we made "Temporary and conditionnal liabality
transfer" a synonym of "perpetual and inconditional usufruct transfer".
May you please enlight me ?
Thanks !
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
e. What do you think happened here ?
Best regards,
--
Jérôme Nicolle
y run a real network with less than 30k route entries in your CAM...
--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
s you could actually multi-home a /32 now...
- --
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlHIsfsACgkQbt+nwQamihvQ8gCdFBEmNiK6XJvLy770bFG/nPa0
IwYAn3cWI4rul5eNvW2t944vOgk
ion policies and
general behavior ?
--
Jérôme Nicolle
06 19 31 27 14
idth and
infrastructure waste...
--
Jérôme Nicolle
address from the correct pool when
> they connect to the network. This really isn't rocket science.
Well, you can't open port25 on Orange's ADSL service ;)
--
Jérôme Nicolle
bandwidth usage stats, unless
eyeballs networks starts to make a major move towards IPv6 effective
deployments.
But honestly, while working mostly for eyballs networks, I can assure
you even the largest ain't close to ready for such a move ;)
--
Jérôme Nicolle
ers grew.
Over the years to come, we'll still see some regions with a growing
number of individual accesses while the well-connected regions will
see their BW consumption grow even larger with new services. Isn't it
what FTTH deployments all around the world are all about ?
--
Jérôme Nicolle
your peer's customer is one basic rule of
peering agreements between tier-2 and 1 networks.
It's a shame financial pragmatism makes the Internet less "meshy", and
thus more fragile...
--
Jérôme Nicolle
ech and wider use
of the Internet as a mean to let the people self-organize in a
political process, thus avoiding violent revolutions
What do you think is best ?
--
Jérôme Nicolle
http://redmine.nocproject.org/projects/noc/wiki
2011/6/7 Jon Heise :
> Aside from rancid, what methods do people have for doing automated backups
> and diffing of router configs ?
>
> - Jon Heise
>
--
Jérôme Nicolle
06 19 31 27 14
t certain traffic requirements for the
> same reason.
That's certainly a valid approach for direct (private) peering, it's
not applicable to IXPs offering route servers.
--
Jérôme Nicolle
n IPv6 adresses ;)
--
Jérôme Nicolle
75 matches
Mail list logo
