As a reminder, this work will begin in approximately 6 hours.
-e
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> The NANOG Mail server will be transitioning to a
> new system next Saturday, April 26th. The maintenance
> window for this transition will be from
> 10:0
he new. The NANOG Program Committee will issue
the NANOG61 call for presentations shortly, marking the availability of the
new tool.
Thanks,
-e
--
Eric Oosting
Network Architect
eoost...@netuf.net | 404-941-6678
Let me start out by saying I'm allergic to CGN, but I got to ask the
question:
Some of the CGN providers are coming out with "fixed" nat solutions for
their IPv6 transition/IPv4 preservation technologies to reduce logging.
This appears to provide for a static mapping of outside ports/IPs to a
part
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> draft-donley-behave-deterministic-cgn
>
That's it. Or more specifically, the section of that draft that points to
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6431#section-2.2
Thanks.
-e
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> '4 MILLION IP ADDRESSES!!!'
>
What is that, an /106?
-e
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Dan Hollis
> wrote:
> > This is what's going on at verizon.
> >
> > http://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/726/
> >
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:46 PM, greg whynott
wrote:
> Team NANOG,
>
> I will summarize once I get to looking at things. This isn't an immediate
> need but with that said I expect to start on it next week. I may not
> evaluate all of them but what I do try I will share.
>
> My next challenge
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Nicholas Schmidt <
nicholas.schm...@controlgroup.com> wrote:
> I cant find a way to reach out to whoever manages ARO directly so I figure
> it would be best to publish this to the list.
>
Nicholas,
It's normally a good idea to email any questions you have to
nan
This morning we suffered a hardware failure in our production environment.
The outage affected nanog mail and web services. While mail services have
recovered, web services are still down.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
-e
At this time, we believe all services have been restored.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Eric Oosting
wrote:
> This morning we suffered a hardware failure in our production environment.
> The outage affected nanog mail and web services. While mail services have
> recovered, web ser
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
> "Ricky Beam" writes:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:39:59 -0500, Rob Seastrom
> wrote:
> >> So there really is no excuse on AT&T's part for the /60s on uverse
> 6rd...
> > ...
> > Handing out /56's like Pez is just wasting address space --
How does team-cymru.org not have a bgp feed of these?
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Note, if you're the PBX guy somewhere, too, that the +1 844 toll free
> prefix
> was activated at 1200EST today.
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
> --
> Make Election Day a federal holiday: http://
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
> > http://comcast6.net/ tells me that the local cmts is v6 enabled. my
> > modem, a cisco dpc3008, is in the supported products list. so how do
> > i turn the sucker on?
> >
> > randy
>
> after a lot of messing about with t
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > just to get IPv6 to work correctly.
>
> i would not have had this problem if i had not done the openwrt thing.
> the stock netgear would have been fine. i brought this on myself
> because i wanted to also run things such as an openvpn serve
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> Owen,
>
> Have you ever worked in a corporate environment? Replacing equipment can
> be a 5-7 year window and has to be justified and budgeted. Replacing a
> piece of equipment because it's an incomplete IPv6 implementation (which
> has chang
14 matches
Mail list logo
