On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Christopher Morrow < morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> '<font size=72>4 MILLION IP ADDRESSES!!!</font>' > What is that, an /106? -e > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Dan Hollis <goe...@sasami.anime.net> > wrote: > > This is what's going on at verizon. > > > > http://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/726/ > > > > -Dan > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Gordon Cook wrote: > > > >> dear Nanog > >> > >> Sorry to bother you, I am sitting here in shock, I have been a > Verizon > >> to FiOS customer for about the past six years at least I think maybe > eight. > >> every now and then the Verizon server will bounce an email back and > tell me > >> that it’s busy or not functioning but just now it bounced one back and > I’m > >> sorry I don’t have a screenshot of what it said but it clearly said > that it > >> considered me to be a spammer. I may be a lot of things but a spammer > I am > >> not. ;-) when I get an email bounced back Apple OS X always > volunteers > >> to use the pair networks server and I always automatically take that > choice > >> giving it never a second thought. > >> > >> it also reminded me that there was a limit on the amount of private > emails > >> a customer could send. > >> > >> And it said I needed to take the alleged spam and send it to > >> > >> spamdetector.upd...@verizon.net and if I remember correctly wait at > least > >> an hour and then try to send the message again. > >> > >> Stating very clearly that no human being would talk to me. > >> > >> what in God’s name is going on? Please a year and a half or two years > >> ago when a route to Ecuador was being filtered a couple of NANOG folk > knew > >> whom to contact and the problem was fixed in record time. I am hoping > >> that I will experience the same thing. I should not be a stranger to > any > >> old time Nanog-ers. but right now I’m feeling really paranoid! > >> > > >
