+1
During the P3P too-and-fro on what constituted PII I lost the argument
that masking off the last bits constituted acceptable non-disclosure
of PII.
Additionally, viewing the long/lat of a property where b/w and
addresses are provisioned as the legal entity which owns the building
seems o
The window for comments closes tomorrow.
Of course, the window for comments that somehow paint ICANN as a
bastion of fools never closes, but anyone in the access and above
business that opines on the structure, and interests, of registrars
and registries, who opines after tomorrow, but not bef
On 8/15/10 6:25 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, Randy Bush wrote:
when the registry work was re-competed and taken from sri to netsol (i
think it was called that at the time), rick adams put in a no cost
when we (sri) lost the defense data network nic contract in may '91,
disa awa
I exchanged notes with someone in Tehran shortly after 6am EDT this
morning. NPR is at least partially incorrect.
Steve Pirk wrote:
Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet
access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are
unable to connect out.
Peter Dambier wrote:
Marc Manthey wrote:
> i hope i can visit wales someday :-))) , it looks very nice, but the
accent is for me as an europen non native english speaker
nearly incomprehensible :-0
Hello Marc,
it is not an accent. It is a language.
In fact most welsh do prono
above link, and routing, at transport, there is a tld effort as well.
Randy Bush wrote:
Does NANOG have an outreach and construction program?
yes. informally, a fair number of nanogians have spent the last few
decades doing tech transfer to the developing economies, including
helping sta
In the applications I wrote earlier this month for BIP (Rural Utilities
Services, USDA) and BTOP (NTIA, non-rural) infrastructure, for Maine's
2nd, I was keenly aware that broadband hasn't taken off as a pervasive,
if not universal service in rural areas of the US.
I don't think the speed metr
In the applications I wrote earlier this month for BIP (Rural Utilities
Services, USDA) and BTOP (NTIA, non-rural) infrastructure, for Maine's
2nd, I was keenly aware that broadband hasn't taken off as a pervasive,
if not universal service in rural areas of the US.
I don't think the speed metr
Fred,
I picked Aroostook, Washington, and Lincoln counties for a 4g wireless
with backhaul infrastructure proposal. A wireline infrastructure
proposal for these counties (BIP) would, for some arbitrary amount of
capital expense, serve some of the population in towns, but leave the
non-in-town pop
+1
I operate a Maine ISP/ASP, and Senator Snowe is my lobbying target.
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Jeff Young wrote:
The more troubling parts of this bill had to do with the President,
at his discretion
randy,
moveon is a maine-based org. it is an effective, fund raising, partisan
organization. it is much more than a click-and-opine vehicle, it puts
hundreds of thousands of dollars into competitive races, and has a
competent political director.
to create a "NagOn" we would have to hire or a
The order arose from Cobell v. Salazar (was C. v. Kempthorne, was C. v.
Norton, was C. v. Babbitt). On October 20th, 2005, Judge Royce C.
Lamberth ordered the Interior Department to disconnect from the Internet
all computer systems that house or provide access to Individual Indian
Trust records
Anyone have news on this? I understand Colt has fixed London and are
working on Dublin, Bruxelles and Geneva... but that's all I have.
Hi,
I've a project that needs approximately a rack, in the Vancouver, BC
area. Suggestions?
Eric
Barry Shein wrote:
I was at an IP (as in intellectual property), um, "constituency" I
think, IPC, meeting at ICANN which basically consisted of 99 lawyers
and me in the room.
By the Montevideo ICANN meeting '01 the "Internet Service Providers
Constituency"
(ISPC) had dwindled down to the co
Ernie,
Martin's suggestions (go rummage around the Berkman dump) is a good one.
Not too far from you is someone who actually is a leading figure in this
somewhat arcane field, Prof. Froomkin at Miami Law. There've been a
couple of papers over the years that are good sources too. Drop a note
t
I should have mentioned this, its a nice, non-fatal, 31pp intro to part
of the problem space, from the IPC weenies:
http://marques.org/sunrise/A%20Perfect%20Sunrise.pdf
Eric
Paul,
I read Gregg Keizer's piece in CW where FireEye's Fengmin Gong is quoted
as "We have registered a couple hundred domains," Gong said, "but we
made the decision that we cannot afford to spend so much money to keep
registering so many [domain] names."
Now interposing on the Srizbi system
This is sort of a rinse and repeat of the degradation of the Iraqi voice
and data networks we annotated in March of 2003. The first is Ma'an
(Turkish), the second is AP (American). Cell service is at the point of
failure. Data is coming close to failure, and landline voice is
problematic too.
Can I get a size 43 wide with steel toes suitable for kicking routers
somewhere proximal to the red buttons?
In a comfortable office casual subdued pastel?
nanog@nanog.org wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen, Get Ready for..
>
> Thought I would let you know about the Fashion Footwear SPRING Sale!
>
Gadi,
I read it. As it happens, about a year ago I plowed through a bunch of
Information Operations (formerly known as Information Warfare) papers in
a then-linkable bibliography on the subject. Your GJIA paper is of that
genre. There wasn't enough for me to distinguish between an ad insert
c
Martin,
I wasn't that impressed with Dave's remarks, but I heard them rather
than read them, which may have made a difference. I agree with your
views on the substance and spirit of Susan's and Wendy's statements.
This -- the new GTLD process -- was originally scheduled to get to
completion
related to offensive TLD's. .
What's your take on that part of the process?
Marty
- Original Message -----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Hannigan
Cc: nanog@nanog.org ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri Jun 27 10:57:15 2008
Su
David Conrad wrote:
... part of that constituency', but in reality, the majority of domain
names are held by registrars. ...
I didn't know that. Can you point me to some data?
Eric
Tony Finch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
I am very curious of what tests a "security-aware programmer" can do,
based on the domain name, which will not be possible tomorrow, should
ICANN allow a few more TLDs.
It makes the "public suffix list" project harder, b
Peter Beckman wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Joe Greco wrote:
I see usefulness in having scopes that are local (city/village/etc),
state, country, and global. There's no reason that you couldn't start
out local, and as you grew, get a state level domain
(martyspizza.wi.us),
and if you went nati
paul,
in another universe, the inhabitants are attempting to find some policy
for dealing with what i'll call a temporally inconsistent name to
address mapping, at a single, and also a second level of indirection. of
course, just about everything that's ever been written (and re-written)
on n
David Conrad wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
aside from just getting some cctlds signed, i will be interested in the
tools, usability, work flow, ... i.e. what is it like for a poor
innocent cctld which wants to sign their zone?
If there is sufficient interest, we could d
Neil Suryakant Patel is the nominee for AS for Communications and
Information at DoC. If he's in the loop, even "advisory pending ...",
and as a Cheney staffer (intially staff secretary, now as a domestic and
economic policy adviser), that's possible, then adjust expectations
accordingly.
Pau
oddly enough, i was chatting with a friend from the w3c while walking
off-site to lunch from the dublin ietf about the life, and death, of the
w3c's p3p project (i was a contributor, he works in a different area),
and its possible re-animation.
without meaning to (i assume) martin's made a lan
After the first and second InterOps our cable plant for networks that
lasted a week were considerably better organized. The short duration
isn't that compelling for ... pasta panic.
Paul Wall wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, William Herrin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One makes differ
Suresh,
In a parallel universe we're considering profiles for "licit use" of
some mechanism. One element of a multi-part test to distinguish "licit"
from "illicit" was the presence or absence of known signatures for
malware. After some thought it was understood that this test was
equivalent t
Randy Bush wrote:
John Bambenek wrote:
When there is no law to speak of all that is left is tribal justice.
this way lies lynch mobs
shall we at least apply a vernier of civilization?
randy
While I appreciate the points both you and John are attempting to make,
as someone who
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:58:00AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
It's not just AS1712. AS1707 - AS1726 appear to all have been
allocated to Renater. AS1707 was ERX'd to RIPE on Sep 9, 2002, but it
appears that AS1708-AS1726 were missed and have subsequently been
reallocated by
Russell,
My personal inclination would be to look for what legit entities are
provisioning them with critical resources and what margins they appear
to be paying.
For DNS resources, the domains, to identify registry preference,
probably a simple volume correlation, and the registrars, which
Dan White wrote:
On 26/11/09 07:37 -0800, David Conrad wrote:
There are folks on this list who work for ISPs which are doing
wildcards/synthesis/etc. They (or, more likely their management) can
tell you there are obvious business reasons why they do
wildcards/synthesis/etc. Perhaps I'm overl
+BIGINT
The real issues are (a) is this billet actually able to originate
policy, (b) interpret existing policy, (c) at least find the RNC mail
archive, (d) ...
Who the hell cares if the billet is filled by a Soviet Mole (tm) if the
job is decoration?
Eric
On 12/23/09 12:42 PM, William Al
Hi all,
On the 7th of next month I'll be participating in an ICANN
consultation on the proposed draft registry agreement, and the number
of "nines" that have crept into it, relative to what was expected of
new registry operators a decade ago, is one of the hidden cost
increases I will discuss
At the Montevideo ICANN meeting, in August, 2001, I was surprised, and
disapointed, that the ISP Constituency had reduced to ... a couple of IP
attorneys.
So, as a point of departure, were one going to advocate policy which
affects ISPs as ISPs, as opposed to ISPs as trademark portfolio
manag
On 1/1/10 4:44 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
...
it's going to be another game of chicken -- will the people who build and/or
deploy such crapware lose their jobs, or will ICANN back down from DNSSEC?
Either (a) a large cohort of entries is added to the root before [pick
predicate condition of choice
ractual distinguishment.
Registrars can be "bad" because they fail to pay ICANN (the commonest
form of registrar deaccreditation) or because they aren't responsive
to email or because they are claimed to be in breech of some specific
term in the current accreditation agreemen
I'm sure someone must, but google as I have I only find "fact sheets"
(marcom collateral) and reports to Congress.
Thanks in advance!
Eric
Folks,
After the Katrina landfall a diverse group of wireless people started
organizing a relief effort, culminating in work around Waveland. There
was also a group from the NPGS in Monterey, who worked on the Boxing
Day Tsunami aftermath.
Does anyone have a similar contact set?
Eric
On 1/15/10 11:52 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> > After the Katrina landfall a diverse group of wireless
people started
> > organizing a relief effort...
>
> There are quite a lot of us working on it, is the
twork Engineer
Haiti Earthquake Survivor
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams
mailto:brun...@nic-naa.net>> wrote:
Folks,
After the Katrina landfall a diverse group of wireless people
started organizing a relief effort, culminating in work around
Waveland. The
ation current as
of this hour.
Eric
On 1/16/10 5:36 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
At around noon, Eastern, the State Department was provided with
information on the fuel situation at the Port au Prince NAP, which has
used 2/3rds of the available diesel (8gal/hour run rate, 160 gal
remaining) ke
nt outcome measure of
sanity.)
Eric
On 1/17/10 10:22 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
Isn't there a US destroyer taskforce off the coast now? One would think they'd
have a supply of diesel available.
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
________
From: Eric Br
Yesterday the US provided 270 gallons of diesel, and the Dominican
Republic provided 100 gallons of diesel. Including battery, the
Xchange Boutilliers is fuel secure through Friday.
Eric
On 1/18/10 12:37 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
There are significant US naval and land assets in place
y, and dependents in need.
Eric
On 1/19/10 1:15 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
Yesterday the US provided 270 gallons of diesel, and the Dominican
Republic provided 100 gallons of diesel. Including battery, the Xchange
Boutilliers is fuel secure through Friday.
If I
On 1/19/10 2:27 PM, Rodney Joffe wrote:
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
I've no idea. I've just been focused on moving the "dry tank" moment
to the right, along with several others. Mind, this was the first
resupply, its not a stable replen
Fletcher,
A belated "good job".
Eric
Folks,
I'm trying to keep the competent engineer count at the Boutilliers NAP
from decrementing to zero in the very proximal future. One of several
problems being worked by several groups of people.
Specifically, I want to get the paperwork done so that Dominique
Theodore Guerrier, wife of R
Naturally, I didn't make all the local connections I could have before
I needed them when I went to NANOG-45, graciously hosted by Terremark.
I think it is unlikely that any of the three paths -- parole from
Homeland Security, visa from State, and Congressional action, are
likely to occur with
On 1/21/10 9:16 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
OK, folks -- we've corrected the scheduling conflict. The secure routing
working is now March 10-12. Please come!
But, But, But, That conflicts with ICANN ... Oh. Never mind. According
to the Protocol Supporting Organization Depricated decision of
[sent to a smaller distribution yesterday evening, now to NANOG for
wider information and coordination purposes, ebw]
All
I am looking into booking Reynold's wife and children into short-term
lodging in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic or in a nearby island.
There has been some progress on a
Deric,
I run a small registrar, and I'm the CTO (confused, tired and
overworked) of a medium sized registrar, which as it happens does
offer the "how to become a registrar" as a consultancy product.
There are a number of procedural steps to take to obtain "ICANN
accreditation".
At that poi
On 1/30/10 8:01 PM, John Levine wrote:
We are doing hosting and
We are interested in doing Domain registra
Could you provide more info?
Although Eric is correct that you can become an ICANN accredited
registrar, that's probably not what you want to do.
Agree, but I'm not going to tell him (o
Mike,
Is your interest events like the recent semi-non-event with H1N1,
where for contagation management, workforce labor and school age
children were not compulsorily aggregated, or morbidity and mortality
effects on network operator labor for an event such as the dispersal
of a weaponized b
All,
Attached is a project description by Reynold Guerrier, Network
Engineer and Treasurer of the Association Haïtienne pour le
développement des technologies de l’Information et de la Communication
(AHTIC).
I know many have helped and many have offered to help, and kit and
people have been
Arg! The attachment died the death of "132485 bytes with a limit of
100 KB". Oh well, it could have been the line eater bug in a USENET post.
I posted an HTML version here:
http://wampum.wabanaki.net/vault/2010/02/005491.html
Cutting and Pasting (a high tech skill) yeilds:
Project Title: Adopt
Steve,
Hmm. Are there other requests like this one? I suppose the pilot's
associations may be trying to raise money to fix the secondary
airfields -- a note from a member of Congress who's significant other
has been shuttling a Cessna and stand-alone early relief payloads from
the US VI to se
this? (No, I don't think this one is fake...)
As a start, web of trust. This one was introduced to the list by Eric
Brunner-Williams originally, a member in good standing.
Err, no. It was introduced by (unsigned) email purporting to come from Eric.
Followed by another (unsigned) me
Folks,
This is a slightly edited, and _unsigned_ resend of my note of the
8th. In an effort to "unbury the lede", the bank routing info is at
the top of the post, as well as the bottom ;-)
Bank: SOGEBANK
Bank Address : Route de Delmas, Delmas 29, Port-au-Prince, HAITI
Account Number: 13021298
On 2/22/10 12:28 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2010-02-22, at 10:09, Gadi Evron wrote:
...
It'd be an interesting twist if contracts between e-mail providers outside
Israel and ISPs inside suddenly made this requirement for e-mail address
portability leak beyond Israel's borders.
Off-list I aske
On 2/23/10 1:25 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
...
And who runs this database?
Local number portability requires a new database, one that didn't exist before,
It's run by a neutral party and maps any phone number to a carrier and
endpoint identifier. (In the US, that database is currently run by
What NANOG contributors, if any, are invited by a government, to join
their national delegation to the initial meeting of the ITU's IPv6
Group in Geneva next week?
le
>> absence was ICANN. Of course, this sample is by no means
>> representative of the entire community, but it's more than "None."
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Martin Hannigan
>> wrote:
>>> None.
>>>
>>>
&
Joly,
It is just another 501(c)(3) incorporated in California. Just as the
ITU is just another treaty organization. The basis for cooperation has
to be mutual interest, not mere assertion of presence, and getting to
maybe after a long, and not very cooperative history, isn't
necessarily YouTube ma
This is from a 3% to 4% estimate of telecomms and datacomms in the
overall Egyptian economy.
The OEDC communique notes that attracting foreign investment may now
be more difficult. (Is there anyone not looking at regional alternatives?)
Source:
http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2011
the authoritative and secondary servers for the "ميسر." zone were
unreachable, a circumstance which existed a year ago for the .ht zone.
the authoritative and secondary servers for the ".eg" zone were
mutually unreachable.
wireline dialtone was prevalent during the prefix withdrawal period.
well, i've argued new gtld registry operators in general do not
benefit from a manditory v6 reachability requirement at transition to
delegation, a position unpopular with v6 evangelicals and others who
suppose that new gtld registry operators will exist to serve "the next
billion users" rather
I disagree... I think that offering alternate name space views to the existing
{b,m}illions of v4 addressed spindles requires IPv6 reachability as well since
those will also be adding IPv6 capabilities in the next year or two.
so your claim is that to have a .cat, serving registrants currently
On 2/9/11 10:32 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
I disagree... I think that offering alternate name space views to the existing
{b,m}illions of v4 addressed spindles requires IPv6 reachability as well since
those will also be adding IPv6
owen,
at several points you assert that gtlds are "global", which i suggest
is an error on your part.
gtlds are whatever the controlling contract (icann) requires, and that
currently lacks an external to the point of service performance
measurement, and whatever the registrants require, with
On 2/14/11 3:30 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
owen,
at several points you assert that gtlds are "global", which i suggest is an
error on your part.
TLDs come in two flavors.
GTLD -- Global Top Level Domain -- A domain whic
On 2/16/11 4:25 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much effect ...
ditto.
i'm not aware of any actions by the .eg registry operator, though i'll
ask, coincidental to the prefix withdrawal.
i suppose in the interests of completeness i should al
On 2/16/11 6:10 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:25 13PM, Fred Baker wrote:
I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much effect;
that's why the bgp prefixes were withdrawn. What was effective was the
withdrawal of BGP prefixes.
Per the NYT article, the
OT, but NANOG is almost always good for quick clue ...
For those who have residential VoIP, what provider {features | bugs}
are most vexing?
For those who provision residential VoIP, what subscriber
{expectations | behaviors} are most vexing?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
First, thanks for all the responses to "What vexes VoIP users?"
I'm looking for pointers to sites, like Geoff Huston's potaroo.net,
that are VoIP clue dense, or mailing lists(*) where the VoIP-full lurk.
Thanks in advance,
Eric
(*) I'm already on the ecrit list, though my real interest in the
On 3/21/11 1:19 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
So the days of pointless TLDs are amongst us as we've now given would-be
registrars the right to print money and companies are forced to purchase
useless domain names in order to protect their trademarks, prevent
squatting, etc. When will sanity prevail?
On 3/26/11 5:17 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
...
But do you really believe playboy are going to give up playboy.com? Or that
new websites are going to register an address that will result in their
website not being visible by 1/6th of the worlds population (
http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/127009/2011
On 3/26/11 7:17 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
...
For some reason the aerodynamics of pigs comes to mind here. Having pigs fly is
just about as likely as having ambitious Southern prosecutors
give up the ability to bring meaningless, but newsworthy, porn prosecutions,
ICANN's new TLD or no.
ICM
uant wrote:
-Original Message-----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams [mailto:brun...@nic-naa.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 7:24 PM
ICM retained competent counsel for the ICANN issue advocacy. I expect
Stuart will retain competent counsel for the follow-on issues.
Yes, it is certain that S
Two comments from two commenters:
I can't seem to find anyone that would benefit from this, with the exception
of Stuart and ICM's shareholders.
... I expect the board and staff really
really would not want to have to answer questions under oath like "who
did you talk
On 3/27/11 2:35 PM, John Levine wrote:
... I expect the board and staff really
really would not want to have to answer questions under oath like "who
did you talk to at the US Department of Commerce about the .XXX
application and what did you say?" and "why did you vote a
On 3/27/11 4:36 PM, John Levine wrote:
Next, on what basis do you make the claim that .coop and .cat have
failed to attract the predicted support from their nominal communities?
Arithmetic, mostly. There are 40,000 co-ops in the United States,
160,000 in Europe, and apparently several million
On 3/27/11 5:50 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Arithmetic, mostly. There are 40,000 co-ops in the United States,
160,000 in Europe, and apparently several million world-wide, yet
there are only 6700 domains in .COOP. I would find it hard to say
that under 3% takeup was significant support.
Do you at
101 - 187 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
