Hey!
New message, please read <http://inhouse.onnet.edu.vn/sleep.php?297>
Durand Alain
On 5/5/09 4:38 PM, "David W. Hankins" wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:22:04PM -0400, Paul Timmins wrote:
>> Sorry for the top post, but as a crazy thought here, why not throw out an
>> RA, and if answered, go into transparent bridge mode? Let the sophisticated
>> users who want routed beha
I would suggest to read RFC3901/BCP91: ³DNS IPv6 Transport Operational
Guidelines² on this topic.
- Alain.
On 6/21/09 5:45 PM, "joel jaeggli" wrote:
> In pratice, most clients are not their own recursive resolvers.
>
> Rui Ribeiro wrote:
>
>> >Hi Steve,
>> >
>> >An IPv6 only device can "
On 11/23/09 7:25 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote:
> how to prevent new instances, both asn and ip?
>
The whole value of the RIR is to guarantee this uniqueness. This problem
should not have happened.
The fact that it has is troublesome. I¹ll make a guess that this is a result
of a clerical error somew
On 12/2/09 7:24 PM, "Brandon Galbraith" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Matthew Dodd wrote:
>
>> > I meant to say 6to4, sorry about that. Nothing special there.
>> >
>> > -Matt
>> >
>> >
> 4to6 would be a mighty nice feature on a CPE =)
===> If you are thinking about only giving a v6
>
> I have looked at DS-lite very carefully. First, DS-Lite fits better
> for cable operators since they have CPE and can have a DS-lite
> function in the CPE that they control, and that in turn allows them to
> provide IPv4, IPv6, and dual-stack to the end-host that they do not
> control. DS
[resending with more readable, apologies for the duplicate]
DS-lite can work both for fixed and wireless scenario, where you have a
laptop/pda/smarphone/tablet
that is only configured by the access network with IPv6 but want to access
IPv4 content FROM IPv4
applications. This is the main differenc
On 1/16/10 8:03 AM, "Jim Burwell" wrote:
> Could well be the case. My idea was that you could do it either way.
> You could have a DS-Lite gateway (Typical. Likely built into the "cable
> modem" or similar device), or in the case where no gateway is available,
> a DS-Lite "client" (basically a
On 1/16/10 10:52 AM, "Cam Byrne" wrote:
>
>A dual-stack capable host like windows 7 does not ensure any ipv6 network
access beyond the local LAN, especially given todays ipv4-only >service
dominance. There are various ways to translate or tunnel to solve this problem,
connecting v6 and v4 islands
On 1/17/10 11:59 AM, "Cameron Byrne" wrote:
> It's unfortunate for me that nobody is interested in talking about the
> question I asked in light of the data i supplied. The question being,
> is it possible for a mobile operator to offer an IPv6-only service
> today to casual Internet users on ne
On 1/17/10 1:01 PM, "Leo Bicknell" wrote:
But, i am legitimately interested in perceived
>> service gaps or issues, given this tightly controlled service
>> definition (web and email).
>
> I think the phones stopped being "tightly controlled" with the
> iPhone and Android phones. They expec
Who said the water at the bottom of the barrel of IPv4 addresses will be
very pure? We ARE running out and the global pain is increasing.
- Alain.
On 1/21/10 6:47 PM, "Bulger, Tim" wrote:
> Having 1/8 allocated cannot be a blessing... There must be thousands of
> underskilled in the wild wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
