On 1/17/10 1:01 PM, "Leo Bicknell" <bickn...@ufp.org> wrote: But, i am legitimately interested in perceived >> service gaps or issues, given this tightly controlled service >> definition (web and email). > > I think the phones stopped being "tightly controlled" with the > iPhone and Android phones. They expect generic IP connectivty, and > are very much not web and e-mail only. Moreso than an IPv6 only > provider, a web and e-mail only provider would probbaly find > themselves at a huge disadvantage to a significant and growing > segment of the market. +1 I made a number of demonstration of mail and web service on an IPv6-only workstation back in early 2000, in my Solaris days. Even ten years ago, it was clear this would not be enough... - Alain.
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today... Jim Burwell
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable t... Owen DeLong
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viab... Jim Burwell
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services... Durand, Alain
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viab... Cam Byrne
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services... Antonio Querubin
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet serv... Cam Byrne
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet serv... Durand, Alain
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet serv... Cameron Byrne
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet serv... Leo Bicknell
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet serv... Durand, Alain
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet serv... Durand, Alain
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet serv... Jim Burwell
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Xiaoliang Zhao
- RE: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? david.binet
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Durand, Alain
- Re: Are IPv6-only Internet services viable today? Cameron Byrne