net. Does anyone actually use that?
best,
dennis
Dennis Bohn
Manager of Network and Systems (ret)
Adelphi University
b...@adelphi.edu
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> Shouldn't that be 2000::/3 ?
>
> Den 2. mar. 2017 17.06 skrev "Aaron Gould" :
>
>
>
> In addition, IPv6 has link local addresses.
> This one seemingly insignificant detail causes so much code churn
> and is probably responsible for 10 years of the IPv6 drag.
AFAICT, Cisco V6 HSRP (mentioning that brand only because it caused me to
try to figure something out, a coincidence th
switching.
It was fun being able to let them in on some real world things, like say
the sinking feeling of making a change in a network and then the phone
starts ringing off the hook :-)Unfortunately, this was likely a
one-time deal that the students got to really learn a couple of things
ab
We are substantially larger and use Aruba, but I am wondering why no one
has mentioned Meraki (now cisco-meraki). We tried one of their give-away
aps and it seemed fine, with the 'cloud management.' I am not advocating
Meraki, just curious.
best,
Dennis Bohn
Manager of Network a
So if someone (say an eyeball network) was putting out a RFQ for a gig say
of upstream cxn and wanted to spec full reachability to the full V6 net,
what would the wording for that spec look like?
Would that get $provider's attention?
On Mar 15, 2016 12:50 AM, "Todd Crane" wrote:
>
> > This is onl
On Mar 16, 2016 10:06 AM, "Christopher Morrow"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Bohn wrote:
> > So if someone (say an eyeball network) was putting out a RFQ for a gig
say
> > of upstream cxn and wanted to spec full reachability to the full V6 net,
&g
6 matches
Mail list logo
