On Mar 16, 2016 10:06 AM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Bohn <b...@adelphi.edu> wrote: > > So if someone (say an eyeball network) was putting out a RFQ for a gig say > > of upstream cxn and wanted to spec full reachability to the full V6 net, > > what would the wording for that spec look like? > > Would that get $provider's attention? > > "We would like transit services to the full ipv4 and ipv6 addressable > space, we would like our prefixes to be advertised to the whole of the > above space as well." > > then you'd by one (some) connection(s) from 'best option #1' and > one(some) connection(s) to 'next best option'. > > I'm not sure 'rfq' is required here is it? ....
I was thinking RFQ with specific requirements might get cogent attention more than a call. Sure they wouldn't change policy for me, but if they were unable to meet quote requirements repeatedly it might have some effect... or am I dreaming? and potentially what knobs > the providers expose to you for bgp TE functionality? Good thought to include that. Tnx. D.