Indeed. Stay tuned. :-)
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:30 PM Matthew Petach
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:37 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
>> CC back to the mailing list for visibility, since I ate the CC list.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:31 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>>
>>> Rod-
>>>
>>> Please
The board has been thinking about enhancements to the NANOG list for a
couple of years now, with the goal of creating a modern interface that the
younger generation of engineers will be more comfortable using.
Those of you that have attended recent NANOG members meetings may recall
that we are cur
...not to mention that all mature networks are moving more towards GUI
front ends for their automated network. As the complexity of a network
increases, CLI access becomes considerably more risky.
The idea that "real engineers use the CLI" is dinosaur thinking that will
eventually land those with
We already have a group on Facebook, and it has it's uses. Like sharing
group pictures from events and other social-y stuff.
It's not so effective as a community forum in my opinion, although I am a
member of many facebook groups who use it in exactly that way and the basic
functionality is there
We are not anticipating any material impacts to any subscribers, whether
real people or list archivers.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:03 PM scott wrote:
>
> One last thing before I stop. How would the numerous NANOG archives
> work when everything is on Discourse? The same?
>
> scott
>
>
At this point, I'd be happy to see others happily deploy a single-lambda
optic of almost any variety! Since deploying 400G in a clients network
(but 100G still being the preferred connection choice), any inquiry with
respect to LR1, FR1 or DR+ is met with "no thanks, LR4 please."
If asked, I'd re
6 matches
Mail list logo
