> WT*F*? I've never understood the appeal of Microtik, and now I understand
> it even less.
>
>
The software is... quirky, at times, but some of their hardware, especially
on the very low-end, is hard to beat.
For instance, they make a SOHO router with five Gigabit Ethernet ports for
$70, which h
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 17:08, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> That is, HTTPs should become assumed.
As much as that would be wonderful from a security standpoint, IMO
it's not realistic to expect every mom-and-pop posting a personal Web
site to pay extra for a static/dedicated IP address from their hosting
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:57, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>
> [dmb] This is the exact question, why, do you NEED a SMTP Relay on ANY
> network. Your domain has a mail server out on the net that if you
> authenticate to, I am sure will relay your mail, and the reverse DNS and SPF
> records would match
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:11, Positively Optimistic <
positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do ISPs handle RIAA notices when NATTING customers.. ? We have
> several customers that don't require public address space that could be
> moved to private.. We're reluctant to make the move du
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 13:54, JoeSox wrote:
> Am I the only one that gets ticked off at the Apple iPhone update
> procedure and the amount of bandwidth it needs?
> Is there any secret I am missing to cut down on the required bandwidth
> needed for it (caching the update somewhere etc)? I don't
Mike Lyon wrote:
I am curious what others in the industry think on this topic. When one
registers a domain they can put in their real information or they can use a
proxy, like Go-Daddy's Domains By Proxy.
If you're using it for your business, the value is pretty slim. You
probably want your b
>
> Opinions on this? I'd be interested in hearing the latest real world
> experience for both and the direction most folks are going in.
>
> I can't speak to which would be better on copper specifically, but in
general I'd favor DHCP over PPPoE. Either way, most of the back-end stuff
will be simil
Jay Hennigan wrote:
We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing
almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else?
Ditto. I'm suddenly glad we paid for that "burstable" option :)
David Smith
MVN.net
Ryan Harden wrote:
While you could probably build a linux router that is just as fast as a
real hardware router, you're always going to run into the moving pieces
part of the equation.
In almost all scenarios, moving parts are more prone to failure than
non-moving parts.
It's quite possible t
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Anyone have experience with RouterOS (http://www.mikrotik.com/)?
Created mostly to run on these guys I think
(http://www.routerboard.com/comparison.html) which generally don't
get above 200k pps on the higher models.. But will RouterOS run on
bigger boxen?
Yes I do, and I
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 02:28, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> Fresh operational content: one of the reasons services like Spamcop
> occasionally list services like Facebook is that they don't honour 5xx
> responses to RCPT TO:. I'd offer some statistics but I'm concerned that
> the legal brigade will jump
11 matches
Mail list logo
