Hi Tal,
> However,
> we are looking for something more detailed that can show a large
> number of latency measurements taken periodically (preferably with as
> small a period as possible).
Have you asked RIPE Atlas for data?
I think this is pretty much what you might find useful.
Greetings
Dan
Hi,
hmm, they get away with it once again. On the other hand their prices
stay low.
Off-topic but somehow important to me:
> HE has an open-peering policy (AFAIK);
> which basically means that tunnelbroker.net traffic is free for
> hetzner.de
Is that true?
That would be great!
Regards
Dan
Hi NANOGers,
tl;dr What is the best practice for filtering a large number of
prefixes at an internet exchange?
Yesterday I ran into problems while writing new filtering rules for
my peerings at a local Exchange. My workflow probably has a flaw,
although it works fine for IPv6 (well, less prefixes
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:04:59 +0100
Job Snijders wrote:
> We also started talks with other debugging projects such as
> RIPE Atlas to explore if cooperation and exchange of information
> can further such projects.
A software-version of the atlas probe would be nice.
But I guess many RING-members
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:55:44 -0500
ML wrote:
> Is this
> being paired with some AS path filtering?
I am a huge fan of path filtering, but I have so very little paths to
maintain that I can say so. I guess most operators to not filter paths,
and building prefix lists is more or less current p
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:31:00 -0500
"Christopher J. Pilkington" wrote:
> Further digging indicates
> that RA and NS don't cross the bridge from wired to wireless.
Are you using the Netgear device for wireless, or is there a wireless
adapter/card/whatever in your linux box?
If you have linux runni
their homepage ;)
regards
Dan
--
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de
sd an attack", hmm?
Nice.
--
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:22 -0500, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:
> 1. How are you making up loss of revenue on IPv4 assignments?
By using legacy IP only were it is necessary. This way I have to support
only one stack (IPv6), that saves me money.
Regards.
Dan
--
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de
x27;t have this MS Visio thingy you all use to set up your Avian
Carrier BGP sessions...
Regards
Dan
--
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:40:45 -0800
Owen DeLong wrote:
> Setting up a proper IPv6 subnet and unique gateway for each VM is
> probably insane, but, potentially less insane than some other
> alternatives.
I second that! I give out a proper configured /64 to every "customer"
regardless of he has one,
11 matches
Mail list logo
