(accidentally sent this to nanog-request earlier, sorry if there is a double
post)
We are an enterprise and we do not yet have a sophisticated service-provider
model yet for billing, capacity-management, or infrastructure consumption. We
have a few vBlocks that we consume internally for IT/busi
Greetings. We have a few facilities within a 30 mile radius, and each has an
ISP link. We use P2P links at the edge to make certain traffic sourcing from
one facility, and destined to the Public IPs at another, stay on the "dirty"
links rather than punting out to the ISP. All sites use the same
We have some aging infrastructure and need to start budgeting next-gen.
* The network has several small routers as individual edges to peers,
WAN, SIP services.
* It has a couple 6509s as Internet edge (full tables, 2 carriers, no
transit, simple policies)
* It has som
As stated, every vendor has its merits. If you really put some time into
developing a list of requirements and then structure a bakeoff that tests
those, you will learn a lot.
Some things to think about:
* don't let JUNOS or any other CLI deter you. You just need to factor in
training and hirin
+1 on the Cyclades (Avocent). We have about 8 of them spread across 3 data
centers. We've used them for roughly 4-5 years. Won't say they are intuitive to
set up, but once they are, they work well. Don't think I've seen one go down,
but then again, they aren't subject to much change. Cost was pr
Request for feedback...
We have a need for an external partner to dynamically advertise their network
to us in two separate data centers. The hitch is that, touching external
partners, our edge routers for B2B partners reside in DMZs.
Now, to ensure failover from one data center to another when
I accidentally sent this to nanog-request yesterday. I could use some feedback
from anyone that can help, please.
Question: will carriers accept IPv6 advertisements smaller than /48?
Our org was approved a /36 based on number of locations. The bulk of those IPs
will be in the data centers. As w
I had a feeling... thanks for the feedback.
CWB
From: Blake Dunlap [mailto:iki...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 9:32 AM
To: Edward Dore
Cc: Cliff Bowles; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 /48 advertisements
Regardless of the carriers, you'll find most ASs on the internet
8 matches
Mail list logo