On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:09:19AM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > > 1) Justify why we need a heavy bureaucracy such as ARIN for IPv6
> > > numbering resources,
> >
> > Because the members of ARIN (and the other four RIRs) want it that way.
> > And because nobody has yet made a serious proposal to I
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:32:47PM -0400, Jeffrey Negro wrote:
> Has anyone on Nanog had any hands on experience with the lower end of the
> new SRX series Junipers? We're looking to purchase two new firewalls, and
> I'm debating going with SSG series or to make the jump to the SRX line. Any
> in
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:54:39AM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> >
> >> For example, for a provider whose entire upstream capacity is 1Gbps, I
> >> have a hard time seeing how a Linux-
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:58:01PM -0700, andrew.wallace wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Tarig Yassin wrote:
> > I would like to issue a question here, who controls this Internet?
>
> The truth to your question is, anybody who wants to. Hackers, activists,
> governments, terrorists all
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:41:05PM -0400, Robert West wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert West [mailto:robert.w...@just-micro.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 10:56 PM
> To: 'Tarig Yassin'
> Subject: RE: Who controlls the Internet?
>
> Each individual government seems to co
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 04:05:33PM -0700, Wil Schultz wrote:
> I apologize for being somewhat off topic...
>
> I've got a fair amount of SPARC hardware (v210 through v490) and 32bit HP
> DL360-380 hardware that I'm looking for creative ways to dispose of or to
> donate.
>
> It seems like a wast
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:28:09AM -0400, Rodrick Brown wrote:
> Its unrealistic to believe payment for priority access isn't going to happen
> this model is used for many other outlets today I'm not sure why so many are
> against it when it comes to net access.
>
Because I pay my ISP for inter
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:40:25AM +1030, Mark Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:15:30 +0100
> Phil Regnauld wrote:
>
> > Nick Hilliard (nick) writes:
> > >
> > > There is a FAQ entry for ipv6 support in ipplan:
> > >
> > > > One feature request that comes up from time to time is IPv6. Addin
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:56:25AM -0600, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 9:28 AM, Jay Ess wrote:
>
> > So, for example, if i don't like how a car works i must be able to build
> > a car to be allowed to voice my opinion?
>
> How much did you pay for the video?
>
What does that matter? Whe
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 07:49:25PM -0800, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> Right, because GCHQ doesn't/hasn't/never would do such a thing...
>
> At least the US has a written constitution and the concept of the people
> being sovereign.
>
> I'll take that over trusting "Her Majesty's..." whatever.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:24:54PM +, Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, James Jones wrote:
>
>> Why does this seem like a really bad idea?
>
> While I think the principal is noble there are operational problems:
>
> 1) Large and increasing quantity of email will be forwarded between
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:30:53AM -0600, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 2/22/2010 10:24 AM, Robert Brockway wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, James Jones wrote:
> >
> >> Why does this seem like a really bad idea?
> >
> > While I think the principal is noble there are operational problems:
>
> I dare s
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 05:39:53AM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:25:42 -0500
> Steven Bellovin wrote:
> > Figuring out how such a solution would work with email is left as an
> > exercise for the reader.
>
> OK, let me give it a shot.
>
> How about if we allow anyone t
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:32:45AM -0600, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 4:43 AM, Cian Brennan wrote:
>
> > As has been pointed out several times, they can easily be pretty close.
> > Simply
> > force them to send using the outgoing server of their new ISP, but allo
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >
> >> The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
> >> are?"
> >
> > Because in some orga
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:34:47AM -0700, Fred Baker wrote:
> Are they using them only within their domain(s), and ARIN addresses outside,
> or are they advertising them to their upstream(s) to be readvertised into the
> backbone?
>
> If they are using them internally and NAT'ing to the outside,
16 matches
Mail list logo
