On 05.05.2009, at 09:33, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Tim Tuppence wrote:
Hello,
I am seeing that www.google.cat resolves from three different
networks.
It even resolves from here: http://www.squish.net/dnscheck/
What is going on?
Why are you expecting it not to?
I think the real question her
Hi,
This is a pretty moronic question, but I've been searching RFC's on-
and-off for a couple of weeks and can't find an answer. So I'm hoping
someone here will know it offhand.
I've been looking through RFC's trying to find a clear statement that
having two interfaces in the same subnet d
On 11.05.2009, at 22:34, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On May 11, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Chris Meidinger wrote:
I would be grateful for a pointer to such an RFC statement,
assuming it exists.
Why would an RFC prohibit this?
Most _implementations_ do, but as far as network "rules" in ge
On 11.05.2009, at 23:00, Charles Wyble wrote:
What does two interfaces in one subnet mean?
Two NICs? Or virtual interfaces?
Two NICs, as in physical interfaces.
On 11.05.2009, at 23:19, Alex H. Ryu wrote:
Unless you configure Layer 2 for two interfaces, it's not going to
work.
It is invalid from networking principle.
If you have to send the traffic for host in same subnet you
configured,
which interface it should send out ?
Basically it may create
On 11.05.2009, at 23:31, Dan White wrote:
Chris Meidinger wrote:
Hi,
This is a pretty moronic question, but I've been searching RFC's on-
and-off for a couple of weeks and can't find an answer. So I'm
hoping someone here will know it offhand.
I've been looking thr
On 11.05.2009, at 23:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:19:56 -0500
From: "Alex H. Ryu"
Unless you configure Layer 2 for two interfaces, it's not going to
work.
It is invalid from networking principle.
If you have to send the traffic for host in same subnet you
configured,
On 11.05.2009, at 23:48, Ben Scott wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Chris Meidinger
wrote:
For example, eth0 is 10.0.0.1/24 and eth1 is 10.0.0.2/24, nothing
like
bonding going on. The customers usually have the idea of running one
interface for administration and another for
On 11.05.2009, at 23:39, Mike O'Connor wrote:
:Hi,
:
:This is a pretty moronic question, but I've been searching RFC's on-
:and-off for a couple of weeks and can't find an answer. So I'm hoping
:someone here will know it offhand.
:
:I've been looking through RFC's trying to find a clear statemen
On 12.05.2009, at 19:37, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Try this:
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bridge
Wow. It's really hard to convince people that you're not trying to
solve a problem today but to avoid one tomorrow.
Stil, I want to thank everyone that responded - both publicly and
pr
On 01.06.2009, at 12:59, Ben Matthew wrote:
Finally I've managed to successfully configure BIND 9 as a slave to
a myDNS server and the AXFR transfers seem to be working fine. This
strikes me as being quite a nice balance of ease of use and
reliability in case myDNS fails on me. Ok I appre
On 29.07.2009, at 22:52, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
Brandon Butterworth wrote:
NAVOG works for me.
I'd prefer Voice Operators' Group Online Network
brandon
*claps*
Imagine the poetry you have to listen to when _those_ guys put you on
hold...
On 02.02.2009, at 18:38, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:20:25 EST, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" said:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:03:57 +0100 (CET)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
closed network? It's very bad practice - unfo
On 11.02.2009, at 14:12, Malte von dem Hagen wrote:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks.
Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me.
I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
OmniGraf
Saqib,
On 07.03.2009, at 12:12, Saqib Ilyas wrote:
I must thank everyone who has answered my queries. Just a couple more
short questions.
For instance, if one is using MRTG, and wants to check if we can meet
a 1 Mbps end-to-end throughput between a couple of customer sites, I
believe you would
On 18.03.2009, at 12:20, Saqib Ilyas wrote:
I'm back! Thanks again to all those who replied. I am wondering how a
service provider might assess availability or reliability figures
using
active measurements. Granted that one could set up traffic generators
between the two PoPs which will be co
Command+0 for the activity viewer - then click on the stop sign
Sent from my iPhone. Please execute spelling errors.
On 18.11.2009, at 17:43, Steven Bellovin wrote:
Does anyone know an easy way to do "kill thread" in MacOS's
Mail.App? It's getting increasingly hard to read the NANOG list on
On 18.11.2009, at 20:08, Jeff Saxe wrote:
> I don't think Steve meant a way to stop the CPU / process thread of
> retrieving email if it is hung talking to an email server, although thank you
> for that. I believe Steve meant "I want to keep reading the NANOG mailing
> list in general, but this
18 matches
Mail list logo
