In gmane.org.operators.nanog, Mike Lewinski via NANOG wrote:
>> https://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
>
> That tac_plus has python 2 dependencies and so has been removed from
> Debian packages. That's not surprising given the last update was 2015
> and Python 2 was EOL in 2020:
> https://www.python
Hello,
if someone from nic.mil (AS721 and/or AS27064) is present please contact
me off-list. I have a persistent routing issue from your network to one
of my prefixes at AS29259 that I can't get cleared, even by bouncing the
prefix. whois-contact (hostmas...@nic.mil) did not answer.
Thanks,
Bernh
Nick Hilliard wrote:
> https://outlook.office365.com does not work on ipv6; looks like this has
> been broken for some while.
>
> Can someone from Microsoft please fix?
>
>> crumpet:/Users/nick% telnet -6 outlook.office365.com 443
>> Trying 2a01:111:f400:1000::9...
>> telnet: connect to address 2
Jason Sherron wrote:
Hello Jason,
> I'm an engineer on the Microsoft Office365 Exchange Online
> ("outlook.office365.com") network team. I'm gathering forensics
> specific to IPv6 reports -- are people still experiencing IPv6-related
> issues? I am interested solely in failures that are IPv6 con
Randy Bush wrote:
> for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in
> rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=
> rejected RCPT : blocked because 118.39.80.118
> is in blacklist at
Jeff Wheeler wrote:
Hello Jeff,
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>> if you know anyone who is filtering /48 , you can start telling them
>> to STOP doing so as a good citizen of internet6.
>
> I had a bit of off-list discussion about this topic, and I was not
> going to bri
On 09.03.2012 17:04, PC wrote:
I think ARIN issues /48s for Provider independent space as the
minimum allocation size, so I'm guessing we shouldn't filter below
that. At least, that's what's in their current policies.
Note that I explicitly wrote:
| I used to be (or still am) on the same page
On 09.03.2012 20:31, Owen DeLong wrote:
Hi,
Let us not forget that there is also the issue of PA /48s being
advertised (quasi-legitimately) for some end-user organizations that
are multi-homed but choose not to get PI space. It is not uncommon to
obtain a PA /48 from provider A and also adverti
Heya everyone,
we have been getting reports lately about unsecured UDP chargen servers
in our network being abused for reflection attacks with spoofed sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_Generator_Protocol
| In the UDP implementation of the protocol, the server sends a UDP
| datagram
Brielle Bruns wrote:
Hey,
>> we have been getting reports lately about unsecured UDP chargen servers
>> in our network being abused for reflection attacks with spoofed sources
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_Generator_Protocol
>>
>> | In the UDP implementation of the protocol, the s
Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> As already said, wireless in infrastructure mode (with access points)
>> always sends traffic between clients through the access point, so a
>> decent AP can filter this.
> How does the client determine that the traffic came from the AP versus
> another client?
I'm not exa
Athanasios Douitsis wrote:
> Heard that they are somewhat picky about who they -enable. Our campus
> has had native IPv6 everywhere and upwards all the way to Geant for many
> years. We are thinking of applying in the hopes that it will boost IPv6
> usage. Did you have any trouble getting th
Wade Peacock wrote:
> We had a discussion today about IPv6 today. During our open thinking
> the topic of client equipment came up. We all commented that we have
> not seen any consumer grade IPv6 enable internet gateways
> (routers/firewalls), a kin to the ever popular Linksys 54G series,
> DLi
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On a more serious note, I can on my Ubuntu machine just "apt-get install
> wide-dhcpv6-client" and I get dhcpv6, it'll properly put stuff in
> resolv.conf for dns-over-ipv6 transport, even though the connection
> manager knows nothing about it, at least dual stack w
Kevin Day wrote:
> Anyone from Activision/Blizzard who would like to chime in with more
> details? :)
I'm definitely not from either of those, but I've found this link:
http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?locale=en_US&tag=IPv6&rhtml=true
---
What is IPv6?
Internet Protocol version 6 (
Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC wrote:
> I can confirm full IPV6 connectivity from HE.
How can you confirm that when HE just admitted to be lacking IPv6 routes
from Cogent and a couple of other players?
Bernhard
Hi,
> Bernhard Schmidt wrote on 05/12/2011 06:27:38 AM:
>
>> Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC wrote:
>>
>> > I can confirm full IPV6 connectivity from HE.
>>
>> How can you confirm that when HE just admitted to be lacking IPv6 routes
>&
17 matches
Mail list logo
