Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like > 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in > rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org > 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=<ped...@nexo.es> > rejected RCPT <owner-radius...@ops.ietf.org>: blocked because 118.39.80.118 > is in blacklist at rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org: Mail from 118.39.80.118 blocked > using Trend Micro Email Reputation database. Please see > <http://www.mail-abuse.com/cgi-bin/lookup?118.39.80.118> > 2012-01-04 00:37:28 no host name found for IP address 118.39.80.118 > 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT 118.39.80.118 too many bad recip > 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in > rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org > > 7.8% is over ipv6 transport > > but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6. > > what do other folk see?
Main inbound MX for a large educational institution sees around 5% of mails coming in via IPv6. Might be a bit biased due to holiday season. Outbound is mostly running on legacy servers without IPv6, yet :-( Bernhard
