http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOZM5ZwN0kM
nope not a problem
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 12:08 PM
To: Jay Ashworth
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: Done a physical security audit lately?
hard to do physical
Can't get anything past you Chris! :-)
Um Yeah! Why wouldn't it be!?
-Original Message-
From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 12:34 PM
To: Azinger, Marla
Cc: Jay Ashwo
Hi Paul
I will email you privately to address your concerns.
Regards
Marla Azinger
Supervisor Network ENG
IP Address Management
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Paul B. Henson
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 5:27 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subjec
I don’t use a credit card. I expense through finance
RIR fees go under a Maintenance code
Database stuff would go under a Contractor code
Cheers
Marla
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:13 AM
Looking into this and getting it to the right crew at Frontier.
Marla
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 8:42 AM
To: Dave Pooser
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: dns on fios/
This issue has now been resolved.
Cheers
Marla
Frontier Communications
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 11:48 AM
To: Azinger, Marla
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: dns on fios/frontier
> Looking i
There are many ways to mediate this. No matter what one is chosen a balance
between market, Networks and policy will need to be met. And in the end
Networks will do what is best for their network. However if there is a norm of
some kind, then at least there will be a target to hover around.
/48's handed out by ARIN are most likely in the PI range that ARIN has deamed
for PI use only. Networks are aware of the PI block and have opened their
filters to let /48 or more specific through if and only if it comes from the
special IP block. That said...not everyone is letting more speci
Or that its really short notice. The posting came out right before a
long holiday weekend. Then the following week is very busy after such a
weekend. Sorry, but my plate is to full and my ability to attend the
BOF may be sketchy due to work needs.
Marla
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Shane- Please redirect your email questions to ARIN ppml or discuss. That
will be a better forum for you with these type of questions. I will also email
you on the side.
Cheers!
Marla Azinger
Frontier Communications
AC Chair
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I haven't followed this entire string. Are you saying ARIN is repeatedly
handing out address space to known abusers? If that's the case then yes, some
form of policy should be worked on. If on the administrative level ARIN is not
researching returned blocks for abuse complaints and working to
FYI-
I have forwarded this conversation to ARIN ppml as this is now a topic for that
mailing list more than NANOG.
Cheers
Marla Azinger
ARIN AC VC
-Original Message-
From: Azinger, Marla [mailto:marla.azin...@frontiercorp.com]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 10:29 AM
To: Christopher
Another one that could be discussed at the ARIN policy bof.
Also, Im forwarding this to the ARIN ppml for any further discussion.
Cheers
Marla
-Original Message-
From: David Conrad [mailto:d...@virtualized.org]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:44 AM
To: Douglas Otis
Cc: NANOG list
S
Hi Iljitsch-
This statement isnt entirely correct. Im not sure if this is just a word
smithing error in your email or if the management of this issue in the ARIN
region isnt well known. I can only address the ARIN region but in that region
if there is a 16 bit ASN in the free pool it will be
I use RWHOIS for proof of who we assign and allocate address space to. I dont
believe an LOA is any more valid or secure than my RWHOIS data base that I keep
and update on a daily basis. In this case I find it a waste of time when
people ask me for LOA's when they can verify the info on my RWH
I'm sending this to the proper request email.
This is a decent idea that I support.
NANOG Crew please read the below email and consider establishing a separate
"socializing" email address so operational topics only exist on the current
email list.
Cheers
Marla Azinger
-Original Message---
16 matches
Mail list logo
