On 2/19/2014 6:48 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Daniel is correct, he gets a cookie! The the others: please learn to
recognize when you have no clue.
simon, you just do not understand the purpose of the nanog list
We've been having the same problem here for the last three days. I
tracked it down to B
On 4/24/2014 8:38 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/24/2014 10:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The invisible hand of the market cannot fix problems when there is a
monopoly.
Put in economic terms, a player with Market Power is extracting Rents.
(Capitalization is intentional.)
Regulating monopoli
On 5/3/2014 9:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
...
Oddly, it seems to be specific to ; any other type request I send
comes back NOERROR correctly. It is like somebody tried to handle
"spe
This post to the NANOG list in the hope that an interested
engineer from either Qwest or GBLX will act on the problem
I have observed.
I've identified a packet loss problem (10-15%) between Qwest
and Global Crossing. From one end (HP), the partial traceroute
is:
traceroute to 68.85.190.221 (68.
> This post to the NANOG list in the hope that an interested
> engineer from either Qwest or GBLX will act on the problem
> I have observed.
>
> I've identified a packet loss problem (10-15%) between Qwest
> and Global Crossing.
Thanks to whomever has fixed the problem. Packet loss is now
zero a
Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
>
> I'm addicted to sipcalc: http://www.routemeister.net/projects/sipcalc/
>
> It's available on standard repositories for MacPorts, Ubuntu, Debian
> and Fedora. I guess install is straightforward in other platforms as
> well.
>
> regards
>
> Carlos
>
> On Wed,
6 matches
Mail list logo
