Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

2022-05-23 Thread Andrew Odlyzko via NANOG
Yes! Some other ways to the basic idea are that The function of data networks is to satisfy human impatience. and The goal is to minimize transaction latency. Once you accept either one, the conclusion that follows is that there is no limit to potential demand (which, however, as always,

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

2022-05-26 Thread Andrew Odlyzko via NANOG
Yes, definitely. But some of those criteria can be combined into one, namely "transaction latency," how long it takes to get something done. Which includes things like uploading a video clip, or a complicated PowerPoint deck, and (behind the scenes from the standpoint of the end user) lots of in

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

2022-06-07 Thread Andrew Odlyzko via NANOG
Yes, human impatience and peace of mind do matter. But willingness to pay is not unlimited. There is an argument, presented in my paper "The volume and value of information," in the International Journal of Communication in 2012, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1570/740 that v

Re: The rise and fall of the 90's telecom bubble

2023-11-13 Thread Andrew Odlyzko via NANOG
Dave Taht's question about all the redundant fiber that was put down in the telecom bubble is a very interesting one. It would be nice if some folks on the list could provide some solid information, even if only for one large carrier. My impression, from communications with various folks, is tha