>Indeed, in many cases, why aren't these things an external, separately rack
mountable box with simply an interconnect to speak to the control plane?
You mean like CRS multi-chassis systems?
adam
whether that's actually what is leaving our
neighbor's network.
It's a pity that rpf is not "on" by default for interfaces over which the
ebgp session is configured.
adam
ss") maybe comfortability of operators.
adam
-Original Message-
From: wher...@gmail.com [mailto:wher...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of William
Herrin
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:43 PM
To: Adam Vitkovsky
Cc: Saku Ytti; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
On Thu,
it to the peer.
> Yet they may well transmit packets to you for which delivery to that peer
is directed by your routing table.
Yes asymmetric routing would kill the update-based urpf unless there would
be an informational urpf NRLI we could use for these purposes
adam
t toward it and have a free transit.
Check out: http://www.bcp38.info
adam
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 9:29 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: route for linx.net in Level3?
In a message written on Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:57:11
to find an alternate next-hop.
Though now with the advent of BGP PIC this is not an argument anymore.
adam
.
Let me know...
Thanks,
Adam
Adam Hobach
CyberLynk Sales/Support - 414-858-9335
supp...@cyberlynk.net or sa...@cyberlynk.net
http://www.CyberLynk.net
https://secure.CyberLynk.net
Well CFM and Ethernet LMI is great help in L2VPN services to pin point the
failed portion of the L2 circuit.
For L3VPN services I rather relay on BFD over PE-CE link and BGP PIC Edge in
the backbone to achieve fast convergence.
adam
Is PTP wireless an option?
--
Adam Greene
Webjogger
www.webjogger.net
845-757-4000
-Original Message-
From: Chris McDonald [mailto:copraph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:08 PM
To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: UN Secretariat building in nyc
l be ready on your part.
adam
: Rikin
adam
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:07 PM
To: Jean-Francois Mezei
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Variety, On The Media, don't understand the Internet
On May 15, 2013, at 09:59 , Jean-Francois Mezei
wrote:
We're having strange issues in NYC metropolitan area.
We can trace from Verizon FIOS to some IP addresses of our ASN 11579
block. Others don't work. The IP's that don't work seem to die at
130.81.107.228 on the Verizon network.
Something is rotten in Denmark. Or NY. You know what I mean.
On
Yep, tried that. Connected with a lower level tech who would not escalate.
Anyone know a Verizon NOC direct contact #?
On 12/12/2011 2:17 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
130.81.107.228
hrm... LCR == lata-core-router... something fairly
> and models that doesn't take "we may not get IPv4 space" into account and have
> a contingency plan for that *deserves* to be soundly mocked and ridiculed in
> public.
That's right
However the original post was concerning a fresh new ISP that can't run their
business the way they would like
Ma
I've had similar experiences to Mr. Petach.
Depending on order of operations, you can look at this from a
different prospective as well -- why go with a soulless entity for
your transit (or transport, collocation, ...) requirements, when you
can "keep it in the family" and engage a peer who alread
(*) If you think I'm going to run an IGP on some of my file servers when
"default route to the world out the public 1G interface, and 5 static routes
describing the private 10G network" is actually the *desired* semantic because
if anybody re-engineers the 10G net enough to make me change the rout
>... host systems should participate in IGP
>We tried that.
>It didn't scale well.
>The Internet today is very different than the Internet in 1981.
-did you? I thought CLNS with plethora of ip addresses compared to ipv4 was
buried before it could be widely deployed, I was not around back than
Actually an a Cisco presentation on Nexus 7k I asked whether it's possible to
transport the FCoE over let's say EoMPLS or VPLS and did not get a straight
answer though that was half a year ago
-but it would be really cool to connect hard-drives directly over continents
adam
---
set the spin in a way to send a 1500kbit packet to NY the NY node
would see it instantly -no cables needed
-also there some attempts to actually send the information 50 micro sec back in
time
Of course there are still these issues with probabilities at quantum level
adam
>What we really need i
only possibility seem to be modificaiton to QM equations
So fingers crossed :)
adam
-Original Message-
From: Aiden Sullivan [mailto:ai...@sullivan.in]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:09 PM
To: Vitkovsky, Adam
Cc: Ray Soucy; Tei; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: next-best-transport! down
I apologize but we are not getting anywhere regarding spam issues with
Hotmail.com/live.com through the normal support channels. Can someone from
hotmail please contact me off-list?
Let me know...
Thanks,
Adam
Adam Hobach
CyberLynk Sales
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, James Wininger wrote:
> We are a smaller ISP in Indiana. We are growing quite rapidly (yeah for
> us). We have a need for a customer notification system. We have simply
> out grown the ability to send emails to our customers manually. We need
> to have a better way
? Technical Support, Helpdesk, or Call
Center. does each term has a specific meaning?
And is there any standard structure of this center? And what is the
relation of this people with other network/software Engineers?
Thanks in advance.
--
Tarig Adam
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:02 PM, chris wrote:
> I am trying to look into dsl in the RDU area and at&t customer service has
> been exceedingly unhelpful only telling me "no service available, we have
> no idea when services will become available, check back periodically".
> I would atleast like to
That is why there's this neutrinos project
It's not faster than the speed of light though it can shoot through the Earth
and no cables cost involved
So far the speed is 0.1 bit per sec
Can't wait for the neutrino SFPs :)
adam
-Original Message-
From: Aled Mo
Or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible
That's what came to my mind when I first heard about quantum entanglement just
to learn that there's really small chance we could ever use it for communication
adam
-Original Message-
From: Leigh Porter [mailto:leigh.por...@ukbroadband.
Jay Ashworth wrote:
Now, those codecs *are* specially tuned for spoken word -- if you try
to stuff music down them, it's not gonna work very well at all...
It was claimed to me many years ago that the 4kHz cutoff used in POTS
serves women and children less well than it does adult males. I hav
Jay Ashworth wrote:
Googling "PCM adult male voice", "4kHz adult male" and similar isn't
finding me anything. Was I told nonsense?
[snippage]
What might be the case is that you'd
have more trouble *distinguishing* amongst women, or between women and
children, because the tones necessary f
http://www.voxel.net offers web-orderable servers and VMs, with BGP
support (IPv4 and IPv6) available as a paid add-on in all service
locations.
I'm honestly surprised we don't see this supported by more folk in the
space. The configuration is relatively trivial to automate, with IRR
data generat
And you get a t-shirt at the end! That was enough motivation for me, anyway :)
--
Adam Kennedy
Network Engineer
Omnicity, Inc.
From: Owen DeLong mailto:o...@delong.com>>
To: isabel dias mailto:isabeldi...@yahoo.com>>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>"
mail
CBT Nuggets is just a quick overview of what you need to read and lab
through in order to know your stuff
adam
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Burtch [mailto:rburt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 3:21 PM
To: Jonathan Rogers
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CBT Nuggets streaming
Right the :::: sounds familiar
I guess there was also an option that the P router would just label switch
the packet towards the exit PE and the PE would than originate the ICMP back
to source
Or you can turn off TTL propagation across the core -so the ICMP could only
time out at the PEs
adam
times which gave birth to the Internet, that has
changed our lives from the ground up
Maybe this time it will be the stock markets and scent of money that will
give the communication development spiral an unimaginable momentum
adam
-Original Message-
From: Naslund, Steve [mailto:snasl
I'm wondering what would be the sane default MAC limit per VPLS domain as
well as per port assuming the RSP can hold up to 512K MAC addresses please?
I believe the answer would partly depend on the business model (like I can
start with 2 MACs per port and 50 per domain and have customers to pay ext
>Does anyone make a cheaper OC3 circuit emulation module or box?
Maybe Cisco ME 3600X 24CX Switch or Cisco ASR 903 Router
adam
7 and Level 6 for customers and carrier-customers
respectfully -would this be enough please?
I'm also interested on what's the rule of thumb for CCMs Frequency, Number
of Packets, Interpacket Interval, Packet Size and Lifetime for the
particular operation
Thanks a lot for any inputs
adam
ween successive packets (or 50 packets/s)
- 1 min duration
- Random start time within the 15 min cycle
- Packet size of 60 bytes (including headers)
- UDP protocol
adam
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon Exley [mailto:jonathon.ex...@kordia.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:
Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi all
Do you have experience in 40G equipments
eg: switch and NIC?
I have never used 40 gig but this:
http://www.extremenetworks.com/products/blackdiamond-x.aspx
appears to have 192 ports of it. I have never seen or used this product
so am not recommending it or attempti
Andreas Echavez wrote:
Hey guys,
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks?
Yes.
> It
seems like the standard just died out. For us it would make a lot of sense
for our applications -- even if throughput and latency aren't as great. If
anyone out there knows of any
I was wondering whether you have some experience with setting of the next
hop tracking delay value for BGP to 0 for critical changes please
There's gonna be only a few prefixes registered with BGP so far, around 150+
adam
It might be some T1 muxing issue
adam
-Original Message-
From: Mikeal Clark [mailto:mikeal.cl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:35 PM
To: Jared Mauch
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MPLS acceptable latency?
The location in question is 7 T1s. They were not willing to
Nor have I been hit by a targeted advertisement, yet
adam
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:30 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google/Youtube problems
In a message written on Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:59:22PM +0200, Saku Yt
For some providers this might be an interesting revenue stream in these days
where we need to build ever faster backbones to carry more and more video
traffic for users that want to pay less and less for high-speed internet
connectivity
adam
-Original Message-
From: Adam Vitkovsky
It looks great though I would not want to troubleshoot the RIB to FIB
programing errors unless there's a note somewhere saying what abbreviation to
search for in FIB.
The other think that comes to mind is that the more specifics could have
different backup next-hops programed.
adam
&
Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC:
Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10049.webjogger.net [204.8.80.49]
227 ms 6 ms 5 ms cpe-24-29-112-25.nyc.res.rr.com
[24.29.112.25]
312 ms 8 ms 7
--
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:46 AM, "Adam Greene"
wrote:
>>
>> Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC:
>>
>> Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234] over a maximum of 30
>> hops:
>>
>> 1 1
Depending on the device used, the zip file can range from
Length: 1515061530 (1.4G) [application/octet-stream]
To
Length: 2119504233 (2.0G) [application/octet-stream]
Parsed from
http://mesu.apple.com/assets/com_apple_MobileAsset_SoftwareUpdate/com_apple_MobileAsset_SoftwareUpdate.xml
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
[...]
> Interestingly enough, it seems Apple primarily used it's own, new, CDN for
> the iOS 8 release:
>
> http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/09/18/apple-chose-to-handle-ios-8-rollout-with-own-content-delivery-network
I noticed same. Mor
Provided without commentary, in case this impacts some operations:
https://www.facebook.com/Tinetworkers/
https://twitter.com/TinetStrike/with_replies
We also prefer using a default route over
engineering things based on some other arbitrary route learned from eBGP.
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+maillist=webjogger@nanog.org] On Behalf
Of Marc Storck
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 6:53 AM
To:
AirCable is also good if you have Bluetooth available. I use that for
Bluetooth and AirConsole with a tablet.
https://www.aircable.net/products/serial5x.php
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:56 AM, g...@1337.io wrote:
> My CF-19 does the trick quite nicely
>
> On 11/10/14 12:39 PM, Max Clark wrote:
>
Ammar,
Feel free to contact me off-list, and I'd be happy to take a look into this
issue for you. Thanks!
On 2/13/2015 8:10 PM, Ammar Zuberi wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a direct phone number for someone with somewhat authority
at GTT? Our prefix has been hijacked by a customer of the
ou want to push more
bandwidth through their devices.
Interested in whether anyone has rolled it out and how their experience has
been.
Thanks,
Adam
Hey!
New message, please read <http://hutsonlegal.com/taking.php?2>
Adam Fields
Hey!
New message, please read <http://ogdenautomotiveinc.com/paid.php?r>
Adam Fields
Hey!
New message, please read <http://arpitshah.co.in/supposed.php?bxu>
Adam Fields
Hey!
New message, please read <http://rosasmedley.com/wish.php?rln>
Adam Fields
Hey!
New message, please read <http://photographytoday.org/dare.php?c2sc>
Adam Fields
Hey!
New message, please read <http://pilotsref.com/saw.php?obt>
Adam Fields
Hey!
New message, please read <http://tunlock.com/wished.php?s6zix>
Adam Armstrong
Hey!
New message, please read <http://boltonautomation.com.au/presence.php?mov>
Adam Armstrong
Hey!
New message, please read <http://moverdubai.net/street.php?jvu8>
Adam Armstrong
Hey!
New message, please read <http://zoomincinema.in/often.php?swg6f>
Adam Armstrong
Hey!
New message, please read <http://ankitstudygroup.com/former.php?5f>
Adam Rothschild
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hey!
New message, please read <http://brazilsail.com/sad.php?wf1ta>
Adam Stasiniewicz
Hey!
New message, please read <http://nlp2.onnet.edu.vn/everybody.php?5u>
Adam Rothschild
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hey!
New message, please read <http://bambooco.ru/now.php?ulcxm>
Vitkovsk Adam
Hey!
New message, please read <http://singdanceplaylearn.com/deep.php?ra>
Vitkovsk Adam
Hey!
New message, please read <http://askdrrutherford.com/find.php?eg>
Vitkovsk Adam
Hey!
New message, please read <http://donpnorthup.com/pass.php?phhxw>
Vitkovsk Adam
Hey!
New message, please read <http://widegrins.com/children.php?p2s>
adam vitkovsky
d SMS from the unit
directly to cell network. The AT&T Beam's were $20 I think and cost us
about $15/mo as additional lines on our corporate plan.
Adam Kennedy | Network & Systems Engineer
Broadband Networks
A Watch Communications Company
PO Box 8 | Rushville, Indiana | 46173
Tel - 8
It was some special offer on our AT&T small business site. Maybe they were
$40 each. I wasn't the one that ordered them but I know they were pretty
cheap and so far working fine!
Adam Kennedy | Network & Systems Engineer
Broadband Networks
A Watch Communications Company
PO Box
running.
Adam Kennedy | Network & Systems Engineer
Broadband Networks
A Watch Communications Company
PO Box 8 | Rushville, Indiana | 46173
Tel - 866-586-1518 | Fax - 866-567-3897
adamkenn...@broadbandnetworks.com
www.broadbandnetworks.com
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Ray Orsini w
Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address space
has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them now.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> On Tue 2016-Jan-26 12:40:06 -0500, Adam Loveless
> wrote:
>
> Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address space
>> has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them now.
>&g
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:08 PM, James Downs wrote:
>
> > On Jan 26, 2016, at 09:40, Adam Loveless
> wrote:
> >
> > Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address
> space
> > has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captcha
I interpreted the FCC press release[*] to apply these provisions to
"broadband access" providers only -- that is to say, not hosters, nor
CDNs. It will indeed be interesting to see how this works once the
full documentation is released.
FWIW,
-a
[*]
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Dail
r example.
>
>
> Again, the key may be that there will be ambiguity that may only be sorted
> out as case law develops around each of these areas. But IANAL so I¹m just
> guessing like the rest of us for now! ;-)
>
> - Jason
>
> On 2/27/15, 3:44 PM, "Adam Rothschild"
An additional advantage for Frontier customers, post acquisition:
http://ipadmin.frontier.com/bilateralpeering_policy.pdf
http://www.verizonenterprise.com/terms/peering/
$0.02,
-a
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Black
> w
(which is how I
would summarize the consensus in 2012)?
Thanks,
Adam
!
On Aug 11, 2015 19:32, "Adam Greene" mailto:maill...@webjogger.net> > wrote:
Hi all,
We are getting ready to renew our fiber contract with our incumbent provider
(Lightower, ASN 46887). We are happy with them, but are looking for
alternatives. At the location in question we
But to be frank I don't know what was the nature of monitoring, phone calls,
internet communication, ...
adam
x27;s done
by the black boxes.
adam
about is the percentage of tier2/3 ISPs doing full internet
in a VRF over common MPLS backbone as I guess it's not that common.
adam
> route reflectors should be in the data plane, ...
I believe in modern networks data-plane and control-plane(s) should be
separated as it provides for great scalability and versatility the drawback
of course is a more complex system to manage.
adam
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 2:32 PM
To: Adam Vitkovsky
Cc: 'John van Oppen'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Multihop eBGP peering or VPN based eBGP peering
>>> route reflectors should be in the data plane,
ec at some point, or is it safe to assume they will
continue to be able to route trouble-free for years to come?
Thanks,
Adam
Abley
Cc: Adam Greene; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Paetec PI space?
f the assignment predated ARIN, then its not clear if current ARIN policy is
applicable.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:18:54PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-26, at 13:52, "Adam Greene" wrote:
>
>
Glen Kent wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody have details on what this vulnerability is?
https://www.blackhat.com/us-13/briefings.html#Nakibly
Glen
Could it be related to:
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130801-lsaospf
announced very recently?
There i
anks,
Adam
oblem.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Vocke [mailto:justin.vo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 4:47 PM
To: Adam Greene
Cc:
Subject: Re: will ISP peer with 2 local WAN routers?
The gotcha with that is then you need a switch in front of the routers. I'd
just setup a carrier on each rout
lso considering accepting full or partial routes
from both providers, one provider per router, and then doing iBGP between
them to balance the load. We're thinking of deploying default routes and
HSRP to stacked 3750's for round-robin load balancing on the LAN side.
Thanks for the help!
Ada
.4
13. 2001:450:2002:288::2 0.0% 6 85.2 85.3 85.1 85.5
0.1
If I route this traffic via Telia it goes direct to Global Crossing's with
a much lower latency. Has anyone else seen this issue with Level3?
Thanks,
Adam
I would be happy to donate a VM or two on my personal stack. Contact me if
interested.
-Adam
Original message
From: Phil Bedard
Date: 10/07/2013 5:51 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Michael Thomas ,nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: nanog.org website - restored
Yeah isn't there
I've heard of folk in and around the NYC metro getting set up for v6
by escalating through their commercial account teams, or the field
service managers who went out to their homes to supervise their
early-adopter [X]GPON ONT installations. This isn't to say the
process was particularly easy or fu
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>> I've heard of folk in and around the NYC metro getting set up for v6
>> by escalating through their commercial account teams, or the field
>
> 'commercial account teams' == business customers?
Sorry, yes, that is correct: one way to ge
Hi TR,
This looks like a very promising service to me as well.
Could you hit me off list with the pricing contact?
The pricing on http://www.spamhaustech.com/datafeed/pricecalculator.lasso is
a little high ($9,223,372,036,854,780,000.00/yr).
:)
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From
Tykwinski [mailto:eric-l...@truenet.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 9:16 AM
To: 'NANOG Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Experiences with Spamhaus BGP DROP, EDROP and BGPCC BGP feeds
Looks like a bug, if you stick a 1 in total email users:
Per Year: $504.00
-Original Message---
How is this considered even remotely relevant to the NANOG list?
VoiceOps, I can sort of see...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Tim Donahue"
>
>> We ported this to an underlying carrier (the guilty party shall remain
>> nameless), an
201 - 300 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
