Where do you get 3 days?
Voyager 1 is about 15.2B miles or 22.665707 hours at the speed of light.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 7:12 PM Nathan Angelacos
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 00:58 -0500, Stas Bilder wrote:
>
> Pity we can’t ping Voyagers.
>
> S.
>
>
>
> ROTFL, you actually had me pull out
See https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status/
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
d3e...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 10:46 AM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Where do you get 3 days?
>
> Voyager 1 is about 15.2B miles or 22.665707 hours at the speed of light.
Josh,
Because the speed of light is different in different mediums. It depends on the
index of refraction. Most of the Internet is on fiber optics, and the speed of
light in glass fiber is dramatically slower than in a vacuum. Long distance
single-mode communication fiber typically has a core i
Once upon a time, Mel Beckman said:
> Because the speed of light is different in different mediums. It depends on
> the index of refraction. Most of the Internet is on fiber optics, and the
> speed of light in glass fiber is dramatically slower than in a vacuum. Long
> distance single-mode comm
Chris,
Of course I do.
-mel
> On Jul 21, 2024, at 8:55 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Mel Beckman said:
>> Because the speed of light is different in different mediums. It depends on
>> the index of refraction. Most of the Internet is on fiber optics, and the
>> speed of li
Keeping this within the realm of TCP/IP, i.e. within Earth terresterial
links and the sphere of Earth geostationary orbits (maybe Lagrange points,
I don't know what communication protocols far-earth satellites use).
I'm not including inter-planetary or inter-stellar communication
protocols.
Mel,
Voyager is using radio waves, which travel faster than the speed of light
(in a vacuum, too!). But my point is more Earth to outside the solar
system is ~24 hours so where did circumnavigating the globe get three days
of latency?
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 2:29 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> Chris,
On 7/21/24 4:05 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Mel,
Voyager is using radio waves, which travel faster than the speed of
light (in a vacuum, too!). But my point is more Earth to outside the
solar system is ~24 hours so where did circumnavigating the globe get
three days of latency?
::Albert Eins
If worst-case is an option, there are some interesting routing policies
between certain places.
One example is a Australia to China--take Perth to Chongqing as an
example. They're at about the same longitude, but RTT is routinely
greater than 500 ms. Packets travel to Singapore, then cross the e
are there any old keyservers still working? or only the new hipster
ones? i tried three and no love
hkps://pgp.mit.edu
hkps://pgp.uni-mainz.de
hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers
randy
On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 16:10 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 7/21/24 4:05 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> >
> > Mel,
> >
> >
> >
> > Voyager is using radio waves, which travel faster than the speed of
> > light (in a vacuum, too!). But my point is more Earth to outside
> > the s
Easy. Bridge loop.
-mel via cell
On Jul 21, 2024, at 4:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Mel,
Voyager is using radio waves, which travel faster than the speed of light (in a
vacuum, too!). But my point is more Earth to outside the solar system is ~24
hours so where did circumnavigating the globe
Once upon a time, Josh Luthman said:
> Voyager is using radio waves, which travel faster than the speed of light
> (in a vacuum, too!).
No...
--
Chris Adams
Whoops, that should have said radio waves travel faster than fiber (more so
in a vacuum).
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 8:07 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Josh Luthman said:
> > Voyager is using radio waves, which travel faster than the speed of light
> > (in a vacuum, too!).
>
> No...
>
pgp.mit.edu has been sporadically available for me over the last while, but yea AFAIU sks-keyservers
shut down after the DoS drama, as did most of the old servers in the pool.
I believe keyserver.ubuntu.com generally works and doesn't strip all the signatures and whatnot off
keys when they uplo
> I think the hipster thing to do now, though, is --auto-locate-key with
> the Web Key Distribution or the DNSSEC Key Distribution mechanism.
i have done wkd for a fair while. but some folk like to pull keyrings,
so i try to keep them updated.
randy
---
ra...@psg.com
`gpg --locate-external-keys
> On Jul 21, 2024, at 19:28, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I think the hipster thing to do now, though, is --auto-locate-key with
>> the Web Key Distribution or the DNSSEC Key Distribution mechanism.
>
> i have done wkd for a fair while. but some folk like to pull keyrings,
> so i try to kee
Well...it gets complicated :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTn6Ewhb27k
On Sunday, 21/07/2024 at 20:15 Josh Luthman wrote:
Whoops, that should have said radio waves travel faster than fiber
(more so in a vacuum).
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 8:07 PM Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Josh
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 18:31 J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2024, at 19:28, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>
>
> I think the hipster thing to do now, though, is --auto-locate-key with
>
> the Web Key Distribution or the DNSSEC Key Distribution mechanism.
>
>
> i have done wkd for a fair w
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:29:06PM -0500, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote:
> I hate to say it but I really think pgp could benefit from a blockchain
> implementation keeping it distributed among peers versus its current status.
Absent a description of exactly how what you're proposing meaningfully
20 matches
Mail list logo
