Y'all --
Does anyone know of a survey or study showing the rate of uptake for BGP over
TCP-AO? I've poked around some and asked in a few places and not found
anything, but I probably missed something out there.
If there's no studies, does anyone have any experiences possibly indicating BGP
ov
Hi,
you can start from here:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/transport-ip/topics/topic-map/tcp-configure-ao-bgp-ldp.html
Regards,
-
Marco Paesani
Skype: mpaesani
Mobile: +39 348 6019349
Success depends on the right choice !
Email: ma...@paesani.it
Il giorn
I don't think that URL explains how commonly it is used.
In my experience TCP-AO use is extremely limited, partly because it's
super new in practice. Juniper had it for a long time, but it was
pre-standard even years after the standard was published, which
probably didn't matter much, as no one el
There's a github repo with configuration examples from a number of vendors
https://github.com/TCP-AO
As for usageslow adoption. I only know of one production deployment
(because I control both eBGP routers :)
https://labs.ripe.net/author/andrew-gallo/production-deployment-of-tcp-authent
We have used it in our core since JunOS 20.3+ but no peers (over 250) have
accepted to use TCP-AO so far.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:20 AM Andrew Gallo wrote:
> There's a github repo with configuration examples from a number of vendors
>
> https://github.com/TCP-AO
>
>
> As for usageslow adop
We’ve had success with multiple VLAN tagged handoffs/BGP sessions w/ Cogent
with various customers of ours in similar scenarios.
Perhaps you can ask for multiple VLANs each with a /31 + /127 + BGP sessions.
> On Jun 11, 2024, at 07:35, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
>
> We were able to get a /28
6 matches
Mail list logo
