There's a github repo with configuration examples from a number of vendors
https://github.com/TCP-AOAs for usage....slow adoption. I only know of one production deployment (because I control both eBGP routers :)
https://labs.ripe.net/author/andrew-gallo/production-deployment-of-tcp-authentication-option/ (maybe Cunningham's law will apply and someone will prove me wrong) On 6/12/2024 7:00 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
I don't think that URL explains how commonly it is used. In my experience TCP-AO use is extremely limited, partly because it's super new in practice. Juniper had it for a long time, but it was pre-standard even years after the standard was published, which probably didn't matter much, as no one else had it at all until somewhat recently. I suspect this type of order of events may have led many people to look into TCP-AO early on, and decided correctly it was not operationally feasible, and that has stuck. On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Marco Paesani <ma...@paesani.it> wrote:Hi, you can start from here: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/transport-ip/topics/topic-map/tcp-configure-ao-bgp-ldp.html Regards, ----- Marco Paesani Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Email: ma...@paesani.it Il giorno mer 12 giu 2024 alle ore 12:52 7ri...@gmail.com <7ri...@gmail.com> ha scritto:Y'all -- Does anyone know of a survey or study showing the rate of uptake for BGP over TCP-AO? I've poked around some and asked in a few places and not found anything, but I probably missed something out there. If there's no studies, does anyone have any experiences possibly indicating BGP over TCP-AO usage they can share? :-) /r
OpenPGP_0x1C61021F8B5942A2.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
