Looks like ocue...@roku.com (Oscar Cuevas) is listed as the NOC contact
for their AS:
https://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS394557/pft
https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/CUEVA24-ARIN
Kind regards,
Noah
On 19/02/2024 15:47, Jason Canady wrote:
Does anyone here have a network contact for Roku? Need so
We reached out to them using peeringdb contacts and got the whole thing
setup in about 4 weeks. Two IX total about 5gbps peak traffic.
So your mileage may vary. FYI that min peering 100gbps I think is just for
PNI. They had no problems setting up sessions over the two IXs we share.
On Mon, Feb 19
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:37 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> We actually had an IETF "Help Desk" at NANOG 63 (San Antonio, 2015) and
> NANOG 64 or 65 ―
> https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2015/01/
> chris-grundemann-nanog-63-talking-bcop-ietf-and-more/ and
> https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2014/1
This is terrible advice, but you might need another netblock for the
eyeballs. Possibly a small one with enterprise NAT, but something outside
the AWS list ranges...
-George
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:35 PM Justin H. wrote:
> That matches my experience with these types of problems in the past.
There are other WAF lists available on AWS besides their native one. Ones that
have support.
> On Feb 20, 2024, at 16:18, George Herbert wrote:
>
> This is terrible advice, but you might need another netblock for the
> eyeballs. Possibly a small one with enterprise NAT, but something outside
Unfortunately, the victim doesn’t chose the WAF list, the web site that is
causing the victim grief chooses the WAF list.
Owen
> On Feb 20, 2024, at 14:15, j...@joelesler.net wrote:
>
> There are other WAF lists available on AWS besides their native one. Ones
> that have support.
>
>> On Fe
There must be a reason why the web site chooses the WAF list to block out the
victim? If so why not the victim to contact the website to request them to talk
to the waf list provider to remove victim ip block?
Edy
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
via NANOG
Sent: Wednesday, 21 Februa
>
> and it's affecting our customers' access to various ===>> websites.<<===
>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:15 PM Pui Ee Luun Edylie wrote:
> There must be a reason why the web site chooses the WAF list to block out
> the victim? If so why not the victim to contact the website to request them
> to
Here’s the usual problem:
Victim is a customer Q of ISP A.
WAF provided by provider X is chosen by website Y.
A has no business relationship with X or Y.
A’s requests to X are rebuffed because A is not a customer of X.
A’s requests to Y are rebuffed because A is not a customer of Y.
A tells Q
9 matches
Mail list logo
