There are other WAF lists available on AWS besides their native one.  Ones that 
have support.

> On Feb 20, 2024, at 16:18, George Herbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This is terrible advice, but you might need another netblock for the 
> eyeballs.  Possibly a small one with enterprise NAT, but something outside 
> the AWS list ranges...
> 
> 
> -George
> 
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:35 PM Justin H. <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> That matches my experience with these types of problems in the past.  
>> Especially when the end-users don't have a process for white-listing.  
>> We actually got a response from one WAF user to "connect to another 
>> network to log in, then you should be able to use the site, because it's 
>> just the login page that's protected".
>> 
>> I am working with someone off-list, so I have hope this can be resolved 
>> without account gymnastics. :)
>> 
>> Justin H.
>> 
>> Owen DeLong wrote:
>> > The whole situation with these WAF as a service setups is a nightmare for 
>> > the affected (afflicted) parties.
>> >
>> > I saw this problem from both sides when I was at Akamai. It’s not great 
>> > from the service provider side, but it’s an absolute shit show for anyone 
>> > on the wrong side of a block. There’s no accountability or process for 
>> > redress of errors whatsoever. The impacted party isn’t a customer of the 
>> > WAF publisher, so they cant get any traction there. The WAF subscriber 
>> > blindly applies the WAF and it’s virtually impossible to track down anyone 
>> > there who even knows that they subscribe to such a thing, let alone get 
>> > them to take useful action.
>> >
>> > Best of luck.  The only thing I saw that worked while I was at Akamai was 
>> > a few entities subscribed to the WAF service and then complained about 
>> > getting blocked from their own web sites. Since they were then Akamai WAF 
>> > customers, they could get Akamai to take action.
>> >
>> > Crazy.
>> >
>> > Owen
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Feb 16, 2024, at 09:19, Justin H. <[email protected] 
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Justin H. wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
>> >>> We found out recently that we are on the HostingProviderIPList (found 
>> >>> here 
>> >>> https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/aws-managed-rule-groups-ip-rep.html)
>> >>>  at AWS and it's affecting our customers' access to various websites.  
>> >>> We are a datacenter, and a hosting provider, but we have plenty of 
>> >>> enterprise customers with eyeballs.
>> >>>
>> >>> We're finding it difficult to find a technical contact that we can reach 
>> >>> since we're not an AWS customer.  Does anyone have a contact or advice 
>> >>> on a solution?
>> >> Sadly we're not getting any traction from standard AWS support, and end 
>> >> users of the WAF list like Reddit and Eventbrite are refusing to 
>> >> whitelist anyone.  Does anyone have any AWS contacts that might be able 
>> >> to assist?  Our enterprise customers are becoming more and more impacted.
>> >>
>> >> Justin H.
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> -george william herbert
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

Reply via email to