Lax dc / ix questiob

Hey there Is it possible to connect Any2 IX from Equinix LA? OneWilshire used to be the place to be, is this still the case? I see in peeringdb Equinix has added a lot of networks. Appreciate if someone with recent experience to share their recommendations. The goal is to reach as many as asian

options for whois server

Anyone out there who has to run an whois or rWhois service know of a currently maintained server package or option? Thanks Mr. Shannon Spurling shan...@more.net

Re: options for whois server

* shan...@more.net (Spurling, Shannon) [Mon 12 Feb 2024, 20:06 CET]: Anyone out there who has to run an whois or rWhois service know of a currently maintained server package or option? https://github.com/irrdnet/irrd4 -- Niels.

IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering

Dear all, At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as: "Can an exception be made for my research prefixes?" There are two sides to this: INSERTING RPKI-invalid route/route6 objects =

Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote: > > On 12 Feb 2024, at 3:14 pm, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: > > At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the > > microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as: > > > > [snip] > > no - I was maki

IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back

Don’t know how much anyone will still care about these pages as there are lots of other sources of similar data these days. However, I finally got around to fixing the two pages I maintain: http://www.delong.com/ipv6_fortune500.html and http://www.delong.com/ipv6_alexa500.html In the case of Al

Re: IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back

Well that data is disappointing. From: NANOG on behalf of Owen DeLong via NANOG Date: Monday, February 12, 2024 at 5:03 PM To: NANOG list Subject: IPv6 Test Pages for Fortune 500 and Top 100 web sites are back Don’t know how much anyone will still care about these pages as there are lots of o

Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering

On 2024-02-12 15:18, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote: I was making an observation that the presentation material was referring to "RPKI-Invalid" while their implementation was using "ROA-Invalid" There is a difference between these two t

Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 05:01:35PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > On 2024-02-12 15:18, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote: > > > I was making an observation that the presentation material was > > > referring to "RPKI-Invalid" while their i

Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering

On 2024-02-12 18:12, Job Snijders wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 05:01:35PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote: On 2024-02-12 15:18, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:07:52PM -0500, Geoff Huston wrote: I was making an observation that the presentation material was referring to

Re: IRRD & exceptions to RPKI-filtering

> On 12 Feb 2024, at 3:14 pm, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: > > Dear all, > > At NANOG 90, Merit presented on their IRRd v4 deployment. At the > microphone Geoff Huston raised a comment which I interpreted as: > >"Can an exception be made for my research prefixes?" > no - I was makin

The Reg does 240/4

I know we had a thread on this last month, but I can't remember what it was titled. ElReg has done a civilian-level backgrounder on the 240/4 issue, for anyone who wants to read and scoff at it. :-) https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/09/240_4_ipv4_block_activism/ Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. As

Re: The Reg does 240/4

Hey there Jay, It's certainly going to make for a good discussion at APRICOT in a few weeks :-) Regards, Christopher Hawker From: NANOG on behalf of Jay R. Ashworth Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 5:19 PM To: North American Operators' Group Subject: The Reg d

Re: The Reg does 240/4

The angst around ipv6 on hackernews that this triggered was pretty revealing and worth thinking about independently. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39316266 In the tik world, people are struggling to deploy ipv6 as even linux kernel 5.7 in routerOS 7.XX still has some needed missing features

Re: The Reg does 240/4

- Original Message - > From: "Dave Taht" > The angst around ipv6 on hackernews that this triggered was pretty > revealing and worth thinking about independently. > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39316266 Thanks; the source where I got the other link mentioned that, and I meant to i

Re: The Reg does 240/4

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:18 AM Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dave Taht" > > > The angst around ipv6 on hackernews that this triggered was pretty > > revealing and worth thinking about independently. > > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39316266 > > Thanks