> On Oct 12, 2023, at 10:59, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> * Laura Smith [Thu 12 Oct 2023, 19:01 CEST]:
>> I mean, most (all ?) of the registries still can't be bothered to validate
>> the information the resource holders post to the database. Last time I
>> asked, e.g. RIPE about it, they basica
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, October 12th, 2023 at 18:59, Niels Bakker
wrote:
> RIPE have a policy that states
Which is exactly what I said Neils. When I asked about it, they pointed me at
a policy.
Well hell, theoretically my company has a policy that describes zero-tol
On Friday, 13 October, 2023 16:04, "Laura Smith via NANOG"
said:
> RIPE could do the same. And some might argue that it is easier for RIPE
> because
> all we are asking is for a valid abuse contact, so its not like Nominet who
> have
> to verify e.g. registrant company ID numbers.
They do.
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bg
To clarify, the original post from myself is more ARIN related and scraping
of ARIN data. The incoming cold contacts from the ipv4-broker-spammer came
to ARIN POCs for an ASN with presence only in the USA.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 8:23 AM t...@pelican.org wrote:
> On Friday, 13 October, 2023 16
i received an arin board electioneering "vote for me" today. i guess
now i have to go vote against then.
randy
6 matches
Mail list logo
