Re: ICANN

2022-07-09 Thread Edwin Mallette
To the OP… I hear ICANN also has a no trolls policy. I’m sure you can find that if you look hard enough. Your best bet is to go find the nearest bridge.l and hang out under it. Don’t worry - they’ll find you. Ed PS - normally I too have a no trolls policy but I couldn’t resist. _

RE: ICANN

2022-07-09 Thread Keith Medcalf
On Friday, 8 July, 2022 19:02, Karl Auerbach said: >Spammers are a scourge and I hope you get that $trilliion. But ICANN >will fairly easily deflect most legal efforts based on a claim that >ICANN bears responsibility. Years ago I proposed a solution from King >Croesus as described by Herodotus

RE: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread Keith Medcalf
>I can't either, but the reality right now seems to be that 911 calls are >failing for anyone on a Rogers cellphone. This is par for the course. These people chose to deal with Rogers despite knowing the consequences. It is like if you bought a Rogers Snowblower and it did not work. That wo

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread JASON BOTHE via NANOG
I see the point you’re trying to make but using the word retarded in this context is not only dumb in itself but offense. Please be more respectful on this list. Thanks > On Jul 9, 2022, at 10:48, Keith Medcalf wrote: > >  >> I can't either, but the reality right now seems to be that 911

Re: ICANN

2022-07-09 Thread Martin Hannigan
[ I know, I know... ] Looks like they have a valid registered agent for service of process in CA: C T Corporation System 33 North Brand Blvd. Suite 700 Glendale, CA 91203 Warm regards, -M< On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:24 AM Keith Medcalf wrote: > > Does anyone have contact information (or a

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 7/9/22 09:54, JASON BOTHE via NANOG wrote: I see the point you’re trying to make but using the word retarded in this context is not only dumb in itself but offense. Please be more respectful on this list. Shall we take another spin on the euphemism treadmill? -- Jay Hennigan - j...@west.n

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread Andrew Paolucci via NANOG
Normally I'd take offense, but in my experience of endless technician calls, hundreds of hours on the phone with support. I can assure Rogers staff are the utmost incompetent out of any I've seen. Only talked to one support tech with them that even knew what DOCSIS was. How can teaching employe

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Just leaving this (yes, satire site) link here https://www.thebeaverton.com/2022/07/rogers-proudly-announces-10-service-charge-for-unplug-and-relax-nationwide-outage/

Message from NANOG Admins

2022-07-09 Thread Valerie Wittkop
REMINDER from the admins… It is understandable that network operations is sometimes frustrating, and can therefore bring out less than normal behaviors in discussion about them. However, please ensure your posts to the mail list are topical, do not go against the Usage Guidelines

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Can we have a discussion with the list admins about a list member appending a threat of violence to their outbound emails? Whether serious or not. Does this person need directions to some local mental healthcare resources? On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 08:48, Keith Medcalf wrote: > > >I can't either,

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread L F
Lest we ALL MOVE ON…. Yes he said “RETARD” = The delay in processing the current status of a Situation… Lets move on to bigger n scarier Post mortems: Was This or Was this NOT A CYBERATTACK ??? Done. Lets deal with REAL threats not PC references. Time to evaluate n re eval Our NTS!! Ve

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

2022-07-09 Thread Victor Kuarsingh
We should move on and focus on constructive comments vs. kicking an operator when they are down. That said, demeaning comments, no matter what they are or whom they are targeted at, is not healthy and is not helpful. regards, Victor K On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 9:11 PM L F wrote: > > Lest we ALL