Peace,
An undisclosed (or, even, yet undiscovered by the vendor)
vulnerability in SOHO Mikrotik routers seems to be exploited by
someone.
Approx. 328 thousand devices already joined the botnet, with each
having unrestricted access to the uplink (up to 1 Gbps). 42,6% of
exploited devices reside in
Last month one of our residential /20 blocks started to get the Captcha
page when searching Google. Around the same time we get access denied on
QVC.com So far nothing out of the ordinary has been observed with regards
to the networks and I do not see any blacklisting sites listing the block
in
Mikrotik is a very popular router in small to medium ISPs, running, well,
everything.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Töma Gavrichenkov"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, S
Hi All,
Another year has passed since our 2020 survey so we're doing it again. As
before, we'd like to hear what's working, what's not, and what could be better
with PeeringDB. Last year's survey heavily influenced our roadmap and
development over the past year. Your feedback is extremely valua
to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune
what they announce? slfow? exploration? ouija board?
randy
Suspect for most th answer is poorly. This is a conversation I've had with
a few people about how they could be well made
-jim
On Thu., Sep. 9, 2021, 12:45 p.m. Randy Bush, wrote:
> to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune
> what they announce? slfow? exploration?
> On Sep 9, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune
> what they announce? slfow? exploration? ouija board?
>
> randy
Generally via sFlow or other traffic detail models.
- Jared
Oof. I wonder if there is any connection to their DDNS service outage a
couple days ago?
https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=178256
*Brandon Svec*
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:43 AM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> Peace,
>
> An undisclosed (or, even, yet undiscovered by the vendor)
> vulnerabil
Peace,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:57 PM Brandon Svec via NANOG wrote:
> Oof. I wonder if there is any connection to their DDNS service outage a
> couple days ago?
> https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=178256
No, hardly any. That one seems to be just a DNS abuse
reporting/delegation issue
Hi all 😊
Hope you all had a great summer!!! Let us know if you’re interested in
presenting something DNSSEC or security related.
Thanks,
Jacques
Call for Participation -- ICANN DNSSEC and Security Workshop for ICANN72
Virtual Annual General Meeting
In cooperation with the ICANN Security a
> On Sep 8, 2021, at 18:55 , Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2021 11:39:50 -0700, Owen DeLong via NANOG said:
>
>> The reality is that if we get content dual-stacked and stop requiring IPv4
>> for new eyeball installations, that’s the biggest initial win.
>
> The problem is "get c
Can anyone provide a sales contact at AT&T for Ehhernet transport in
Indiana/Illinois/Ohio?
Unicast replies welcome.
--
Brandon Martin
Fyi there are 3 main ways to buy at&t; direct retail, through an agent and
through a carrier with an att wholesale agreement.
If your looking for DIA that is price fixed no matter the sales channel,
but transport is a fish market... We have sold circuits to customers at
over 50% less than retail q
No rest for the wired 🙂
From: NANOG on behalf of Töma
Gavrichenkov
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 10:07 AM
To: Brandon Svec
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Mirai botnet is back — now as "Meris"
Peace,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:57 PM Brandon Svec via NANOG wrote:
>
This month's FCC meeting includes a notice of proposed rulemaking on
wireless network resilience cooperative framework, outage reporting, and
backup power arrangements.
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-375607A1.pdf
What the NPRM Would Do:
• Seek comment on potential impro
Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
The reality is that if we get content dual-stacked and stop requiring IPv4
for new eyeball installations, that’s the biggest initial win.
This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date,
we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define
Owen DeLong via NANOG writes:
> This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date,
> we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define Internet Access
> to be IPv6” by a couple of the larger eyeball ISPs would light a pretty
> big fire under those laggards.
>
> Think abo
17 matches
Mail list logo
