Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> writes: > This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date, > we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define Internet Access > to be IPv6” by a couple of the larger eyeball ISPs would light a pretty > big fire under those laggards. > > Think about it… Amazon doesn’t want to lose access to Comcast, T-Mobile, > Verizon Wireless, and/or AT&T eyeballs any more than those ISPs want > to deal with the call center consequences if they turn off IPv4 before those > content providers are ready.
By all means, let's just escalate the peering wars between eyeball networks and content providers. That will solve all our problems. Bjørn
