Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 10:58 PM Elad Cohen wrote: > Anyone that is interested to receive any answer from me, please email me > directly, I will say that Ronald Guilmette is intentionally spreading lies, > and for the sake of Nanog community I will not reply to him over and over in > the same c

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

If AfriNIC says your "purchases" are misappropriation you'll have to do a lot better than conspiracy theories and phrenology in counter argument. Why are you using the word "purchases" with quotation marks, it seems that you are a victim of your next paragraph, and I'm writing it with

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

For those curious, Johan indicated on Twitter this was a JunOS bug. https://twitter.com/gustawsson/status/1328298914785730561 Matt > On Nov 15, 2020, at 23:13, Matt Corallo wrote: > > Maybe? Never been an issue before. In this case the route does have a depref > community on Telia hence why

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

I would like to formally request that Mr. Cohen's privileges to post to this list be revoked, or otherwise curtailed. It's one thing to dispute facts with evidence, or generally disagree on a topic. However , threats of legal action and personal attacks citing Old Testament mumbo jumbo, while crea

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

Tom, Until today all I wrote was facts and evidence, in the contrary to Pore-spilling Ronald. When Ronald keeps defaming me here non-stop, Yes my full right is to sue him, even if you prefer that my blood will be shed here by his filthy soul and pores. And you can be sure that I will respond to

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

I’ve done the simple thing: I’ve blocked all emails with the keyword AFRINIC in them. I’m not willing to let my inbox be swamped with another deluge of “pore spilling” (whatever that is) vitriol. -mel beckman On Nov 16, 2020, at 7:07 AM, Elad Cohen wrote:  Tom, Until today all I wrote was

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

"Pore-spilling" is the daily care of Ronald to his filthy smelly rotten pores. Ronald, please feel free to explain more. From: Mel Beckman Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 5:17 PM To: Elad Cohen Cc: Tom Beecher ; nanog@nanog.org ; adm...@nanog.org Subject: Re: A

RE: Re[2]: Disney+ Geolocation (again)

Hi Mike, You may want to add technical operations services team techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com We wrote to the distribution address and they replied forwarding it to services Brian From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Friday, November

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

If you don’t have coherent argument, take Trump’s approach with an incoherent ad-hominem attack. I have been filling this issue with a lot of interest, and to date you have offered no evidence of anything, apart from your ability to spew vitriol. > On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:04 AM, Elad Cohen w

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

On 11/16/2020 9:54 AM, Tom Beecher wrote: I would like to formally request that Mr. Cohen's privileges to post to this list be revoked, or otherwise curtailed. +1 Several months ago, Elad Cohen went on record claiming that I was secretly "Rob Shultz" from Spamhaus - an outrageous lie. (Spamh

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

NANOG Staff member that is granted the privilege of reading the list and ensuring all folks adhere to the Usage Guidelines of the list here… Note this thread is not in the spirit of the guidelines for operational and technical content discussi

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

DELIBERATE TOP POST It would be helpful to the NANOG list if posters could try to follow posting guidelines and discuss technical (not personal) topics. James R. Cutler james.cut...@consultant.com GPG keys: hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net > On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:04 AM, Elad Cohen wrote:

Re: PeeringDB Satisfaction Survey open now til November 20th

We're still looking for more responses to the PeeringDB survey. Most people took about 2-3 minutes to fill it in, so it's pretty short. Please give us your feedback if you have a moment: https://surveyhero.com/c/f7be5236 -Steve > On Nov 2, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Steve McManus wrote: > > Peerin

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

On 11/15/20 8:57 PM, Elad Cohen wrote: That's it... - I find it strange that you ignored the exact same message at AfNOG sent several minutes earlier, yet try to save your 'reputation' here. I also note that after Ronald's email at

Re: Phoenix-IX Contact

An update on my side, we reached out to PhoenixNAP, one of the Phoenix-IX's vendors. PhoenixNAP reached out all of their contacts at Phoenix-IX and have received no response. They are in as much of the dark as the rest of us. I feel like I'm on the Ghost ship Phoenix-IX. What I don't understan

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

- On Nov 15, 2020, at 5:58 PM, Matt Corallo na...@as397444.net wrote: > Has anyone else experienced issues where Telia won't withdraw (though will > happily accept an overriding) prefixes for the past week, at least? I have seen issues like this in a network that I operated. In that particula

Re: Phoenix-IX Contact

While I agree it is objectively irresponsible to abandon a project without passing it to another, I think that possibly in this situation we don't know all the details? 2020 has been a difficult year for everyone. Perhaps Paul (and whomever else may be responsible for Phoenix-IX) were subject to t

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

See my latest response from this morning. Telia's "Head of Network Engineering & Architecture" confirmed on Twitter this was due to a (now-worked-around) bug in JunOS. https://twitter.com/gustawsson/status/1328298914785730561 Matt On 11/16/20 2:13 PM, Sabri Berisha wrote: - On Nov 15, 202

Re: Phoenix-IX Contact

Great news! Paul is attempting to respond! His email, including NANOG bounce is included below. Paul, thanks for reaching out! — Kate ## > On Nov 16, 2020, at 12:32, Paul Emmons wrote: > > Sorry to blast everyone that posted, But I guess I am still awaiting > moderator approval to post. >

ATT Contact for DDoS?

Trying to figure out whom to escalate to with ATT to help with a DDoS attack for a network, we are trying to help out. RTBH is not sufficient because they are hitting a large swath of IPs out of the prefixes advertised, and the targets are moving. The network AS itself is the attack target. I

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

- On Nov 16, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Matt Corallo na...@as397444.net wrote: Hi, > See my latest response from this morning. Telia's "Head of Network > Engineering & > Architecture" confirmed on Twitter this > was due to a (now-worked-around) bug in JunOS. > > https://twitter.com/gustawsson/statu

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:36:58 -0800, Sabri Berisha said: > Also, in the case that I described it wasn't a Junos device. Makes me wonder > how bugs > like that get introduced. One would expect that after 20+ years of writing > BGP code, > handling a withdrawl would be easy-peasy. Handling a withd

Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:22:33 +, Elad Cohen said: > Did I start legal proceedings with AfriNIC with conspiracy theories or with > facts and data? OK.. I'll probably end up regretting this, but... Is there any actual independently verifiable proof that legal proceeding have been started? p

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

Surely they can just put them in an array. ;) On Mon, Nov 16, 2020, 21:54 Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:36:58 -0800, Sabri Berisha said: > > > Also, in the case that I described it wasn't a Junos device. Makes me > wonder how bugs > > like that get introduced. One would expe

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 03:40, Sabri Berisha wrote: Hey Sabri, > Also, in the case that I described it wasn't a Junos device. Makes me wonder > how bugs > like that get introduced. One would expect that after 20+ years of writing > BGP code, > handling a withdrawl would be easy-peasy. I don't

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

I'm not generally into conspiracy, but as I keep trying to work out the issue I described in this thread, I came across this:     https://sneak.berlin/20201112/your-computer-isnt-yours/ Might explain quite a lot, actually, (particularly at the FAQ section under "When did this start?") and why

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 09:17, Mark Tinka wrote: > https://sneak.berlin/20201112/your-computer-isnt-yours/ https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202491 I am not trying to make any argument, just wanted to add context. -- ++ytti

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

On 11/17/20 09:26, Saku Ytti wrote: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202491 I am not trying to make any argument, just wanted to add context. Yes, saw that too, and that post by Apple is also highlighted (and explained) in the same report. The Gatekeeper OCSP checks remain unencrypted.