DELIBERATE TOP POST It would be helpful to the NANOG list if posters could try to follow posting guidelines and discuss technical (not personal) topics.
James R. Cutler james.cut...@consultant.com GPG keys: hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net > On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:04 AM, Elad Cohen <e...@netstyle.io> wrote: > > Tom, > > Until today all I wrote was facts and evidence, in the contrary to > Pore-spilling Ronald. When Ronald keeps defaming me here non-stop, Yes my > full right is to sue him, even if you prefer that my blood will be shed here > by his filthy soul and pores. And you can be sure that I will respond to any > of his defamation messages. > > "No value to the community" - there is value to the community, anyone which > is following Pore-spilling Ronald is following the ancient snake, it is not > written in Old Testament, it is written in Old Scripture, go ahead and check, > Ronald visual appearance match one by one to the lawless one description > (lawless one is a term of New Testament) according to Old Scripture. > > Go swim in Ronald juicy pores if you would like. > > > From: Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc <mailto:beec...@beecher.cc>> > Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 4:54 PM > To: Elad Cohen <e...@netstyle.io <mailto:e...@netstyle.io>> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org> <nanog@nanog.org > <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>; adm...@nanog.org <mailto:adm...@nanog.org> > <adm...@nanog.org <mailto:adm...@nanog.org>> > Subject: Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues > > I would like to formally request that Mr. Cohen's privileges to post to this > list be revoked, or otherwise curtailed. > > It's one thing to dispute facts with evidence, or generally disagree on a > topic. However , threats of legal action and personal attacks citing Old > Testament mumbo jumbo, while creative, provide no value to the community. > > As Mr. Herrin stated well, we are all swimming in enough nutter butter > conspiracy theory nonsense every day. I hope we don't normalize it here too. > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:24 AM Elad Cohen <e...@netstyle.io > <mailto:e...@netstyle.io>> wrote: > ---- > If AfriNIC says your "purchases" are misappropriation you'll have to do a lot > better than conspiracy theories and phrenology in counter argument. > ---- > > Why are you using the word "purchases" with quotation marks, it seems that > you are a victim of your next paragraph, and I'm writing it with all due > respect. > > Did I start legal proceedings with AfriNIC with conspiracy theories or with > facts and data? > > Phrenology (and racism) is the field of Coconut Guilmette, according to his > own quotes right here in Nanog. > > "If AfriNIC says" - AfriNIC, nor Spamhaus, nor Ops-Trust, nor MyBroadband, > are not the word of god and are not above law and justice. > > To remind to everyone: AfriNIC filed a police complaint on themselves. And > AfriNIC CEO lied to the community in the following link when he wrote that I > was given a chance to respond when in reality all my emails were ignored. And > AfriNIC CEO is intentionally hiding from the community that any AfriNIC > policy is applied also to any legacy netblock that even don't have a signed > RSA (according to the legal proceedings against AfriNIC, and in contradiction > to AfriNIC "Legacy Resource Holders" webpage: > https://afrinic.net/membership/legacy-resource > <https://afrinic.net/membership/legacy-resource> ), it have implications on > each and every legacy resource holder all over the world (that a RIR can just > delete a legacy netblock). > > https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/2020-January/003458.html > > <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/2020-January/003458.html> > - "We are also ensuring that the current holder/contact of the resources are > provided with the opportunity of proving their ownership." > > > Besides the above, AfriNIC also have a financial motive in their actions, > approximately up to more $4M per year from assets that they illegaly and > unjustifiably took from me (by sub-allocating them to AfriNIC members), while > writing lies to their community and playing a long with the "community > pressure" game. > > > I find the actions of AfriNIC to be very dangerous, because they are not > based on facts and data and law and justice, but only on community pressure. > Any network operator, that can elevate himself/herself from bad habits (like > enjoying seeing blood spilled and jealousy), would know that today it is me > but tomorrow it can be you. > > > > From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+elad=netstyle...@nanog.org > <mailto:netstyle...@nanog.org>> on behalf of William Herrin <b...@herrin.us > <mailto:b...@herrin.us>> > Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 10:00 AM > Cc: nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org> <nanog@nanog.org > <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> > Subject: Re: AFRINIC IP Block Thefts -- The Saga Continues > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 10:58 PM Elad Cohen <e...@netstyle.io > <mailto:e...@netstyle.io>> wrote: > > Anyone that is interested to receive any answer from me, please email me > > directly, I will say that Ronald Guilmette is intentionally spreading lies, > > and for the sake of Nanog community I will not reply to him over and over > > in the same coin, I was gladly interested in the past to share all the > > information (including AfriNIC legal proceedings) with a person respected > > by the Nanog community (and I'm still interested to do so today), such as > > William Herrin, or to anyone else respected by the Nanog community. > > Ugh. I don't suppose I can gracefully decline this honor? > > > > legacy netblocks that I purchased legally, in what AfriNIC and Ronald > > Guillmette and Jan Vermeulen are calling "misappropriation". If anyone can > > explain that to me I will be thankful. > > Ronald Guilmette match one by one to the description of the lawless one in > > old scriptures: > > If AfriNIC says your "purchases" are misappropriation you'll have to > do a lot better than conspiracy theories and phrenology in counter > argument. > > You could probably have picked a better venue for it too, one whose > participants aren't presently being treated to an exhausting quantity > of whack-job conspiracy theories every time they turn on the news. > You'll find us predisposed to believe the peddler of a conspiracy > theory to be a fool. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > P.S. Ronald, I know you've been spoken to about ad hominem attacks. > You could have stopped after the first two paragraphs and the link. > Your screed and faux questions about what crooks you thought these > folks to be added exactly nothing to the conversation you hoped to > start.
