Hi Folks,
While in the US soon all Firefox users will *NOT* use your DNS Recursives
configured using DHCP anymore
(NXDOMAIN use-application-dns.net to avoid that[1]).
Next to that, it seems some of the root operators are now creating instances in
the same networks that offer these kind of servic
In message <152f0dbc-f7af-2a78-c5a7-f2062effe...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>,
Masataka Ohta wrote:
> From whois information:
>
>remarks:reg-date:1993-03-22
>
>notify: tmiy...@gaijin.co.jp
I already talked to the guy who has o
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
To me:
notify: tmiy...@gaijin.co.jp
merely suggest miyoko has some relationships with
gaijin (foreigners), which is partly why I guess:
www.ffei.co.uk
is the owner.
Masataka Ohta
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 09:15 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Hi Folks,
Hi.
> While in the US soon all Firefox users will *NOT* use your DNS
> Recursives configured using DHCP anymore
> (NXDOMAIN use-application-dns.net to avoid that[1]).
What am I misunderstanding? Isn't use-application-dns.net su
On 2019-09-18 12:24, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 09:15 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>
> Hi.
>
>> While in the US soon all Firefox users will *NOT* use your DNS
>> Recursives configured using DHCP anymore
>> (NXDOMAIN use-application-dns.net to avoid that[1]).
>
>
Why on Earth would anyone want that (Firefox deciding to do it's own DNS) as
default behavior?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Jeroen Massar"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Wednesday, September
Because getting each ISP in the world to comply with NSA monitoring requests
was too hard, instead they get to centralize the full list of every website the
everyone in the world visits on a single fleet of servers in Cloudflare's
datacenters. This means we only need to compromise one person to
For efficiency of censorship. If you want to stop some domain name from
resolving you have to get everyone on the planet to block that DNS resolution
in their recursive resolver. However, if everyone uses the same single DNS
server operated by a single entity, then you only have to coerce th
Hello Martin, unfortunately RPKI is not yet technically possible for a legacy
range in Afrinic.
From: Martijn Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 11:44 PM
To: Elad Cohen ; Ronald F. Guilmette
; nanog@nanog.org ; Martijn Schmidt
Subject: Re: Cogent sales r
Please see the following link:
https://afrinic.net/resource-certification
As you can see, a MyAFRINIC account is required.
Yes, route objects for legacy AFRINIC resources in their RIR operated IRRDB as
a fallback for RPKI can be created and they were created by us.
Hello,
Anyone would have a contact at OLM LLC (AS19916)? They are still
announcing a /24, part of a /22 we bought a few months ago. I guess
it's a misconfiguration on their side, but I'm unable to reach them.
I'm now trying to reach their transit, Windstream Communications
(AS7029), because they
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:54 AM Elad Cohen wrote:
>
> Please see the following link:
>
> https://afrinic.net/resource-certification
>
> As you can see, a MyAFRINIC account is required.
>
seems like you should do this step, then do the rpki step.
> Yes, route objects for legacy AFRINIC resources
Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
Given that there is (or should be) an unbroken chain of contracts and
payments from IANA to RIR (to NIR) to LIR and beyond for all
non-legacy resources, I'd say they are in a pretty good position to
take care of the due diligence work to validate an organisation'
In message , Elad Cohen wrote:
>Please see the following link:
>
>https://afrinic.net/resource-certification
>
>As you can see, a MyAFRINIC account is required.
>
>Yes, route objects for legacy AFRINIC resources in their RIR operated IRRDB
> as a fallback for RPKI can be created and they were cre
It would be good to see some receipts, offered by the selling party.
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Come now Mr. Cohen, please do tell us who you paid for rights to the
168.198.0.0/16 block, which belongs to the Australian government,
If you think the Australian government haven't transfer its IP address
to Mr. Cohen, all you should do is let the Australian governm
Hello everyone
Trying to understand the case from operators here who generate IRR based
filters.
Say if a given example:
AS X originating 2001:DB8::/32 with IRR route object having AS X in the
origin
AS X originating 2001:DB8::/48 with IRR route object having AS Y in the
origin
Now for folk
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:34 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
>
> Trying to understand the case from operators here who generate IRR based
> filters.
>
>
>
> Say if a given example:
>
> AS X originating 2001:DB8::/32 with IRR route object having AS X in the origin
> AS X ori
In article <8580e3e4-98b8-2828-e43f-6115c92fa...@massar.ch> you write:
>Currently though:
>
>use-application-dns.net. 172800IN NS
>ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com.
>use-application-dns.net. 172800IN NS
>ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com.
>use-application-dns.net. 172
In message <15744848-5638-ad01-2c9c-a89825f9d...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>,
Masataka Ohta wrote:
>Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> Come now Mr. Cohen, please do tell us who you paid for rights to the
>> 168.198.0.0/16 block, which belongs to the Australian government,
>
>If you think the Austral
Mr. Guilmette, my curiosity has now been increased as I notice Cogent is
no longer supplying routing for the /16's you have spoken of. It
certainly would be nice to see Mr. Cohen demonstrate proof of legitimate
ownership. I have never seen Cogent behave in this manner unless there
really is some ne
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
It is a well known fundamental tenet of logical reasoning and argument
that it is not possible for -anyone- to prove a negative, which is what
you've just asked me to do.
So, Australian government does not think it is a victim of a
crime. Right?
I certainly cannot
This article assumes Multi-cloud is a fad because it doesnt offer much
value and its like sd-wan, a mere marchitecture.
What if these products turn into controllers, working with Equinix and/or
carriers to provide cloud-coloco, orchestrated by the cloud.
https://medium.com/@kenhuiny/multi-cloud
In message ,
Masataka Ohta wrote:
>Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> It is a well known fundamental tenet of logical reasoning and argument
>> that it is not possible for -anyone- to prove a negative, which is what
>> you've just asked me to do.
>
>So, Australian government does not think it is a v
I tried to ask this earlier, I think, but...
"who cares about the sale?"
I ask this because I think getting wrapped around that axle is the
wrong place to spend resources.
If the outcome of 'someone' controlling IP space is that there is
abusive activity coming from that space and either no actio
With the difficulty of getting IPs off SPAM RBLs being what they are, I’m not
sure I like the bone-chilling idea of accepting null-routing entire ranges as
standard practice.
Same reasons, no central repository, no easy/quick/objective/cheap way to
remove an illegitimate entry - and then the re
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:19 PM Ben Cannon wrote:
> With the difficulty of getting IPs off SPAM RBLs being what they are, I’m
> not sure I like the bone-chilling idea of accepting null-routing entire
> ranges as standard practice.
>
I didn't say spam-rbl.
>
> Same reasons, no central reposito
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> So, if you are looking for a Crime here, i.e. one defined under law,
> there isn't one.
You don't know how broadly crime of fraud is defined by
the current code.
Just injecting false route information may not be a
crime.
However, doing so for financial gain maybe a
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
With respect to the Australian government's knowledge or lack thereof,
I really have no idea. If you want to know what they know, or do not
know, I encourage you to ask them yourself. It appears that this will
be rather easier for you to do, than for me to do, since
Hello there
Few people who is doing a lot of work in Colombia, we decided to start
Colombia network operators group and arrange local meetups, provide people
support who want to have infrastructure here.
Feel free to join www.nog.com.co and our first face to face meeting will be
in december, date
30 matches
Mail list logo
