I just joined nanog to allow me to respond to a thread that Simon posted in
March. .
(Not sure if this is how to respond)
We have the exact same problem with Aruba Access points and with multiple
MacBooks and a iMac.
Where the device will spoof the default gateway and the effect is that vlan
is no
Hello NANOG,
I was wondering if there was a list of networks that enforce RPKI
validation and dropping invalids.
The shortlist I know is: AT&T (since February of this year) and of course
NTT because of Job
Thanks
Eric
Dear Eric,
If you don't mind me showering you with some study resources... here we
go!
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:58:48AM -0400, Eric Dugas wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a list of networks that enforce RPKI
> validation and dropping invalids.
The last list that was compiled is available
Hey all,
Are there plans for CL and Level3 to combine AS's into one network?
If not, do they actively peer and route traffic through each other's
networks at least?
Basically we're looking at picking up 1G of CL and wondering if it's near
the same quality as Level3 in terms of latency and packet
I wouldn't expect them to be integrated for at least another decade. Global
Crossing AS3549 still exists with over 2,000 peer ASNs, yet Level 3 acquired
them in 2011. Time Warner Telecom was acquired in 2014 and it still has 89 peer
ASNs.
Centurylink bought Digital Teleport in 2003 and their
Once upon a time, Darin Steffl said:
> Are there plans for CL and Level3 to combine AS's into one network?
We have CenturyLink transit from old Qwest (AS 209) and old Level3 (AS
3356) in Chicago... when we ordered the more recent circuit, both sales
and tech said that there's no plan to merge the
That '2000 peer ASN's' value is likely very, very inflated. I have prefixes
that would look like I am peering with 3549 directly in many places that I
do not.
L3 has for some time had a partial as-merge community that you can set so
that if you announce a prefix to 3356, they'll mirror it over to
All new CL Internet get's provisioned on AS3356
You would need a strong case for them to put you on AS209
At this time they are not merging the two AS's
And also define "quality" ;-)
-Romeo
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Darin Steffl
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 12:02 PM
To: North American Network Oper
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 10:03 AM Romeo Czumbil
wrote:
> All new CL Internet get's provisioned on AS3356
> You would need a strong case for them to put you on AS209
>
> At this time they are not merging the two AS's
> And also define "quality" ;-)
>
> -Romeo
>
That isn't true in my recent experien
On 6/7/2019 11:03 AM, Romeo Czumbil wrote:
All new CL Internet get's provisioned on AS3356
You would need a strong case for them to put you on AS209
Got provisioned last year on AS209 when they turned up my ent Fiber with
BGP.
Could depend heavily on what services and where.
--
Brielle Bru
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@li
On Fri 2019-Jun-07 16:21:29 +1000, www boy wrote:
I just joined nanog to allow me to respond to a thread that Simon posted in
March. .
(Not sure if this is how to respond)
We have the exact same problem with Aruba Access points and with multiple
MacBooks and a iMac.
Where the device will spoo
Turn on client isolation on the access points?
> On Jun 7, 2019, at 3:00 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri 2019-Jun-07 16:21:29 +1000, www boy wrote:
>>
>> I just joined nanog to allow me to respond to a thread that Simon posted in
>> March. .
>> (Not sure if this is how to respond)
>>
On 7/Jun/19 16:58, Eric Dugas wrote:
> Hello NANOG,
>
> I was wondering if there was a list of networks that enforce RPKI
> validation and dropping invalids.
In Africa, we (SEACOM - AS37100) and Workonline (AS37271) have had it
enabled since April this year.
>
> The shortlist I know is: AT&T
This is a less than helpful feature in a lot of situations…
e.g. I was attempting to work on an IOT device and test OTA firmware updates in
a Hotel a little while ago.
The client isolation on the wifi network resulted in non-obvious failures that
took some time to identify.
In general, people
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:14 AM www boy wrote:
> I just joined nanog to allow me to respond to a thread that Simon posted
in March. .
> (Not sure if this is how to respond)
>
> We have the exact same problem with Aruba Access points and with multiple
MacBooks and a iMac.
> Where the device will spo
For those of us with Aruba wireless, www boy, could you share some more
info about your setup/code version/configuration/specific APs/controller
model(s)/etc?
Matt Freitag
Network Engineer
Michigan Tech IT
Michigan Technological University
We can help.
mtu.edu/it
(906) 487-
On Fri, Jun 7, 2
17 matches
Mail list logo
