On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:42:31AM +0100, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
> and phishers/exploiters. HTML markup in email is used exclusively
> by four kinds of people
I'll accept that as a friendly amendment. ;)
It is -- to Brian Kantor's point elsewhere in the thread -- very
unfortunate that many b
This is implementation specific.
Consider hash result returning range 0-15.
Then number of port count as divisor of 16/n must result in an integer value.
To workaround this issue, you either have larger range of hash
results, in which case unequal distribution has small bias, or you
have differ
A last resort route (default route) could still be good to take from your
ISP(s) even if you still do full routes, as the propagation is happening on
the internet side, you should at least have a path inbound through the
other provider. The default route at least would send the traffic out if
it d
http://icaruswept.com/2016/06/28/who-owns-the-internet/
.written in 12/2015 - do y'all think this is accurate, and, in 2018, is it
still accurate ? (asking since my next question is related to Sparkle, since
they are listed in that previous article as a significant Internet presence)
Also,
Replace Level3 with CenturyLink as they're basically taking over AS33566. Would
add Zayo (AS6461) to the list.
I'm not familiar with Sparkle/Seabone to be honest as we're operating an
eyeball network exclusively in the NA.
On May 16 2018, at 10:54 am, Aaron Gould wrote:
>
> http://icaruswept.co
Ditto also interested have dozens of old entries from previous delegations
would like to see cleaned up but my google-foo tells me it's been a
nonresponsive black hole several years now that probably should just go away if
it's not going to be maintained properly. I think my favorite is the "Is
Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane
electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best
providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may
have one of the most critical infrastructures, and should be a "part-owner"
of the internet
As stated yesterday, email was fixed on AltDB yesterday. Please try again.
Thanks,
Mike
> On May 16, 2018, at 08:55, Delacruz, Anthony B
> wrote:
>
> Ditto also interested have dozens of old entries from previous delegations
> would like to see cleaned up but my google-foo tells me it's been
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse wrote:
> Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane
> electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best
> providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may
> have one of the most critic
Are you referring to auto-dbm@ email, or the db-admin@ one? I emailed
db-admin@ about 15 hours ago, and haven't heard back (although it didn't
bounce this time!) Not sure what sort of response time to expect from a
free service though.
On 5/16/2018 12:17 PM, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
As s
On 16/05/2018 19:12, Michael Crapse wrote:
HE listed currently in 7th place:
http://as-rank.caida.org/
-Hank
> Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane
> electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best
> providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll s
I could use static routes but I noticed since I moved to full routes I have
had a lot fewer customer complaints about latency(especially when it comes
to Voice and VPN traffic).
I wasn't using per-packet load balancing. I believe juniper default is per
IP.
My timers are as follows
Active Holdtim
Erich,
Good Idea. I can't believe I didn't think of that earlier. Simple and
effective. I will go ahead and request the defaults from my ISP and update
the thread of the findings.
Thanks!
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:03 AM Kaiser, Erich wrote:
> A last resort route (default route) could still be
To me then the Anker AK-A7611011 sounds perfect. It has indicator lights,
good build quality and uses said Realtek chip.
On Wed, 16 May 2018, 01:51 Colton Conor, wrote:
> Mario,
>
> Thanks for the recommendation. I am leaning towards the devices with
> a Realtek RTL8153 chipset over the devices
Could a proofpoint e-mail blacklist contact, contact me?
We are trying to solve undelivered mails and can't get ahold of anyone.
Thank you in advance,
I’m curious if anyone who’s used 3356 for transit has found shortcomings in how
their peering and redundancy is configured, or what a normal expectation to
have is. The Tampa Bay market has been completely down for 3356 IP services
twice so far this year, each for what I’d consider an unaccepta
Many routers do not rehash everything when a link breaks.
Doing so would disturb flows that were not broken, causing possible
misordered packets or jitter.
The flows on the broken link will get rehashed, of course.
Note that even if a hash function can distribute the flows evenly,
you may get some
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:13 AM, ConsulTIC - Cyprien Laleau via NANOG <
nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> Could a proofpoint e-mail blacklist contact, contact me?
> We are trying to solve undelivered mails and can't get ahold of anyone.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
Responded off list.
Thanks,
--Jaren
> On May 16, 2018, at 5:55 AM, ~ wrote:
>
> AK-A7611011
The Anker USB-C to Ethernet adapter also uses the Realtek 0x8153 chip.
I did exactly that when I called. One is looking into the other hasn't
called yet. I will let you know what they say.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:59 PM Phil Lavin
wrote:
> Ask if they will configure BFD for you. I’ve not found many transit
> providers that will, but it’s worth a shot and it will
On 16/May/18 16:54, Aaron Gould wrote:
> .written in 12/2015 - do y'all think this is accurate, and, in 2018, is it
> still accurate ? (asking since my next question is related to Sparkle, since
> they are listed in that previous article as a significant Internet presence)
I don't know about "ow
If most of your traffic is for US based destinations, you might see worse
performance since Sparkle doesn't seem to have many US POPs/Peering
locations compared to Centurylink/Level3 or HE. You'd probably benefit more
by pulling in some peering from Dallas than adding or replacing a transit
provide
Hello,
Also Sparkle (AS6762) has a significant footprint in South America, I'd say
even bigger than Level 3 because they have mobile telco and broadband ISP
in Brazil.
I wouldn't worry much with latency in NA because at least in South America
they do hot potato (as everyone does) and all their P
A draft of the new ICANN Whois policy was published a few days ago.
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-gtld-registration-data-temp-specs-14may18-en.pdf
>From that document:
"This Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (Temporary
Specification) establishes temporary
I think this is the worst of both worlds. The data is basically still
public, but you cannot access it unless someone marks you as a
"friend".
This policy is basically what Facebook is. And how well it played out
once folks realised that their shared data wasn't actually private?
C.
On 16 May
Thanks.
What's an eyeball network ?
How do you know my "current mix is decent" ?
Btw, I have onsite the cdn's aanp, ggc, oca, fna, so only about ~60% of my
customer traffic is from Internet uplinks... ~40% is served from local cdn's
Aaron
> On May 16, 2018, at 2:31 PM, Jared Geiger wrot
--- aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
From: Aaron Gould
What's an eyeball network ?
---
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyeball_network
scott
Agree with this 💯
Traffic engineering is non existent making it a pain to move your traffic
besides not advertising the prefix to them
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 16, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse wrote:
>>
>> Additionally, whilst not "
On 16/May/18 18:59, David Hubbard wrote:
> I’m curious if anyone who’s used 3356 for transit has found shortcomings in
> how their peering and redundancy is configured, or what a normal expectation
> to have is. The Tampa Bay market has been completely down for 3356 IP
> services twice so fa
As others have noted, there can be implementation specific issues that
you can't necessarily predict but most typically when I hear "odd vs
even" discussions, usually the caveat is not a trunk but a redundant
connection. Putting three links on router A and two links on router B
obviously doesn't wo
On 2018-05-16 15:22, Adam Kajtar wrote:
> I wasn't using per-packet load balancing. I believe juniper default is per
> IP.
The Juniper default is to not do ECMP at all. Only a single route is
programmed into the FIB for each prefix in your RIB. If you e.g. have
routes to 198.51.100.0/24 pointin
I assumed your AS number is 16527 and looked up who you currently are
peering with.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> What's an eyeball network ?
>
> How do you know my "current mix is decent" ?
>
> Btw, I have onsite the cdn's aanp, ggc, oca, fna, so only about ~
While we are on ECMP topic...
In L3VPN, when I've learned say, 3 different routes all using different MPLS
tags to the 3 remote PE's, is there a way to ECMP hash across all of the paths
to load balance?
Aaron
> On May 16, 2018, at 6:32 PM, Thomas Bellman wrote:
>
>> On 2018-05-16 15:22, Adam
On May 16, 2018 at 16:10 muren...@gmail.com (Constantine A. Murenin) wrote:
> I think this is the worst of both worlds. The data is basically still
> public, but you cannot access it unless someone marks you as a
> "friend".
>
> This policy is basically what Facebook is. And how well it pl
On 05/15/2018 04:34 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:47:50PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> TL;DR = Don't use HTML email [snip]
>
> That's enough right there. HTML markup in email is used exclusively
> by three kinds of people: (1) ignorant newbies who don't know any
At this point if I were a registrar or registry doing business in such a way as
to be subject to gdpr, I’d seriously consider spinning up a subsidiary only for
that purpose and leave it with minimal revenues and nothing to collect in the
event of a lawsuit. Either that or simply stop doing busin
On May 16, 2018 at 18:18 o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) wrote:
> At this point if I were a registrar or registry doing business in such a way
> as to be subject to gdpr, I’d seriously consider spinning up a subsidiary
> only for that purpose and leave it with minimal revenues and nothing to
37 matches
Mail list logo
