Good afternoon,
Has anyone notice any abnormal spike in Akamai trafic in the last 24-48
hours compared to other days. I know it was black tuesday yesterday but
traffic from last month didn't even come close to what we saw from Akamai.
We have some caching servers and even notice a spike to them a
Dear List
Last week, this report has now created bit of a stir within the net-neutrality
policy circles and ISPs in India.
I was hoping anyone here could see if this analysis and hunch about Airtel
India’s sneaky practices is indeed correct :
https://medium.com/@karthikb351/airtel-is-sniffing-a
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/15/asia/turkey-military-action/index.html?adkey=bn
On 15 July 2016 at 14:46, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/15/turkey-low-flying-jets-and-gunfire-heard-in-ankara1/
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
> > On Jul 15, 2016, at 4:44 PM, b.
Look at reddit
https://www.reddit.com/live/x9gf3donjlkq
:)
Ge
> Le 15 juil. 2016 à 22:48, Dovid Bender a écrit :
>
> Seems so. Check twitter. Its been on there for about an hour.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dovid
>
> -Original Message-
> From: b...@theworld.com
> Sender: "NANOG" Date: Fri, 15 J
This message just arrived...
Received: from mail.nanog.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.nanog.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AA42D47BB;
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:15:14 + (UTC)
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Delivered-To: nanog@nanog.org
Received: from mail-it0-x245.google.com (mail
It might be an attempt actually and not a real coup.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016, at 04:48 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
> Seems so. Check twitter. Its been on there for about an hour.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dovid
>
> -Original Message-
> From: b...@theworld.com
> Sender: "NANOG" Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016
We noticed on the 12th and 13th there was a significant up tick in
traffic served from our Akamai servers as well.
At 05:37 PM 13/07/2016, eric c wrote:
Good afternoon,
Has anyone notice any abnormal spike in Akamai trafic in the last 24-48
hours compared to other days. I know it was black
Lil late to the party?
Received: from mail.nanog.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.nanog.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E884C2D4872;
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:15:20 + (UTC)
We noticed that on the 12th-14th we had multiple subscribers on ~5Mbps
subscription rates that were being sent ~50Mbps of data sourced from TCP
port 80 (apparently HTTP) from Limelight Networks' servers. The data did
appear to be user requested, still not sure why TCP didn't throttle the
data r
I also am seeing messages from several threads being delayed 3-5 days
*Ben Hatton*
Network Engineer
Haefele TV Inc.
d:(607)589-8000
bhat...@htva.net
www.htva.net
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> This message just arrived...
>
> Received: from mail.nanog.org (lo
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> This message just arrived...
Hi Stephane and the list,
The NANOG mailing list has a policy to hold the first post from all new
subscribers and those who have not posted in a long time (one year+).
As it is a manual process to
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:53:02AM -0500,
Andy Koch wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
> The NANOG mailing list has a policy to hold the first post from all
> new subscribers and those who have not posted in a long time (one
> year+).
So, the batch of messages which has just been "libera
Several of my WISP colleagues have noticed this behavior (CDN sending way more
traffic than the customer's pipe can handle) from (I believe) multiple CDNs.
Not sure if it is intention on behalf of the CDN or an error, but it has been
on-going for several months if not years.
-
Mike Ham
Wondering if anyone from the Google NOC is on-list.
Having issues reaching your authoritative name servers that appear to be
anycasted on Level3's network.
Traffic to your name servers 216.239.32.10, 216.239.34.10, 216.239.36.10
and 216.239.38.10 dies in what appears to be Legacy Global C
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:37 PM, eric c wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Has anyone notice any abnormal spike in Akamai trafic in the last 24-48
> hours compared to other days. I know it was black tuesday yesterday but
> traffic from last month didn't even come close to what we saw from Akamai.
>
> We
replying offlist (I'm sure I'm not the only one)
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
> Wondering if anyone from the Google NOC is on-list.
>
> Having issues reaching your authoritative name servers that appear to be
> anycasted on Level3's network.
>
> Traffic to your name serve
Hey all,
I'm looking for a document or set of photos/presentation on best practices
for telcoflex/-48VDC power cabling installation. Labeling, routing,
organization and termination, etc. Or a recommendation on a printed book
that covers this topic.
Not necessarily fully oldschool "we're going to
Not sure where to find it exactly but the Bellcore power wiring standard is
what is used for central office installations. I think if you google Bellcore
standard you will find what you are looking for.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nano
Began investigating packet loss and latency to Russia earlier this morning.
Issue appears to be hit or miss and affecting more than others certain traffic
types (lower priority?).
Are there any Level 3 engineer who can provide details/assistance?
Anyone seeing anything similar?
Host
ATT TP76300, section 4 goes over installation best practices, although it
doesn't cover Engineering guidelines. It's adapted from the Telcordia GR -
1275 standard, little easier to read. Is there a specific question you're
looking to answer?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:n
Pretty much this, hoping somebody out there might have developed
photographic training materials based on the DC cabling & installation
section of TP76300 with illustrated "Do it like this, don't do this"
examples. Or would be willing to share photographic examples of their own
work which is done i
Things look ok from here:
2 216.182.224.138 (216.182.224.138) 50.787 ms 50.775 ms 50.773 ms
3 100.66.8.180 (100.66.8.180) 14.457 ms 100.66.8.190 (100.66.8.190)
14.991 ms 100.66.8.170 (100.66.8.170) 14.833 ms
4 100.66.11.160 (100.66.11.160) 16.969 ms 100.66.11.192
(100.66.11.192) 33.0
I'm happy to help. Feel free to contact me offline.
Jason Bothe, Manager of Networking
Rice University
o +1 713 348 5500
m +1 713 703 3552
Sent from mobile
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 11:57, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> Pretty much this, hoping somebody out there might have developed
> photographic trai
We responded to Jeremy off-list, which turned out to be a different issue,
but its worth noting. We swung AS7774 over to a different provider
yesterday morning at our three peering points. We spot checked several
route views and looking glass servers for AS paths around the globe and
didn't find an
I found this as well, which is very helpful. Wish more radio manufacturers
were as clear about this in the spec sheet:
http://backhaul.help.mimosa.co/backhaul-faq-maximum-tx-power-details
In one channel, two chains, it's +24, if using two channels and four chains
+21 Tx power. Then it's possible
Apologies for that, it went to the wrong list. While the OSI layer 1
characteristics of new PTP microwave bridges are undoubtedly fascinating,
such discussion may be a little too fine grained for network operational
lists.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> I found this as we
26 matches
Mail list logo
