My read on the situation is Yet Another Intermediate Cacheing Fail in storage,
a well known problem. Yes, do a pull the power test on your storage so you
KNOW what's committed...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>
> As the sayin
Who out there is using production-scale NAT64? What solution are you using?
Thanks,
Jawaid
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:44:10 -0600, Jawaid Shell2 said:
> Who out there is using production-scale NAT64? What solution are you using?
OK, I'll bite - what definition of "production-scale" are you using?
Production use for how many digits worth of simultaneous users?
pgpswQd9cxthI.pgp
Description
It appears that this list is sending its outbound traffic via Amazon's
cloud operation.
This is a profoundly horrible idea, not through any fault of yours, but
because Amazon's cloud operation is a massive, non-stop fountain of spam
and Amazon personnel flatly refuse to lift a finger to do anythi
Hi Rich,
Thank you for letting me know, I expected Amazon to actually take care of
spammers and not let it be a free for all. I can definitely switch it
elsewhere, so please let me know what you have in mind.
I can let the mailman server do deliveries as well, so that's a second
option.
Best re
HI Guys:
I must have missed this but where can I sign up for this new mailing list?
Thank you.
Alex
On 8/20/2015 8:51 AM, Rafael Possamai wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thank you for letting me know, I expected Amazon to actually take care of
spammers and not let it be a free for all. I can definitely swi
The ALU 7750 MS-ISA card can handle 10Gbps of NAT64 traffic and supports
464XLAT as well.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015, at 07:44 AM, Jawaid Shell2 wrote:
> Who out there is using production-scale NAT64? What solution are you
> using?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Jawaid Shell2 wrote:
> Who out there is using production-scale NAT64? What solution are you using?
You used "NAT64" and "production" in the same sentence. Good one.
Seriously though, if you want to run a v6-only network and still
support access to IPv4 Internet r
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:36 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Jawaid Shell2 wrote:
> > Who out there is using production-scale NAT64? What solution are you
> using?
>
> You used "NAT64" and "production" in the same sentence. Good one.
>
> Seriously though, if you want
FWIW I agree.
On August 20, 2015 at 11:43 r...@gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec) wrote:
>
> It appears that this list is sending its outbound traffic via Amazon's
> cloud operation.
>
> This is a profoundly horrible idea, not through any fault of yours, but
> because Amazon's cloud operation is a
I'm looking through their MIB browser and I don't see anything about
communities nor anything that sounds likely under bgp4PathAttrEntry
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Ca By wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:36 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> Seriously though, if you want to run a v6-only network and still
>> support access to IPv4 Internet resources, consider 464XLAT or
>> DS-Lite.
>
> NAT64 is a required component of 464XLAT.
S
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Jesse McGraw wrote:
> I'm looking through their MIB browser and I don't see anything about
> communities nor anything that sounds likely under bgp4PathAttrEntry
>
> Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Doesn't seem to be there. Can you check if they
end up as strings
13 matches
Mail list logo
