Ricky Beam schreef op 18-7-2015 om 1:14:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:25:26 -0400, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
mean that your UBee has to do dhcpv6? (or the downstream thingy from
the UBee has to do dhcpv6?)
The Ubee "router" is in bridge mode. Customers have ZERO access to the
thing, even when it i
Federal government lands on you like a sack of bricks if you don't provide
this information through their (in)secure website. No exceptions.
Sometimes you can't fire the vendor because they're not a vendor, they're a
freaking regulatory agency with the power to crush you like a bug, and a 5
year a
I had to beat up on AT&T quite a bit, but instead of letting them "make
notes", escalate to tier-2 because you can't reach work. Explain that you
must have IPv6 to reach work to the tier-2. If they won't help demand to
be escalated further. Your time on the phone costs them money.
On Sat, Jul 1
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> I had to beat up on AT&T quite a bit, but instead of letting them "make
> notes", escalate to tier-2 because you can't reach work. Explain that you
> must have IPv6 to reach work to the tier-2. If they won't help demand to
> be escalated fur
The best way to "complain" is to simply move the service to another
provider (when possible). 50 bucks a month of revenue to them is not worth
the hassle of having a tech user asking for all sorts of non-standard
configs. It shouldn't be that way, but that's how it usually goes. Think
about it, eve
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 09:17 , Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>
>
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2015, at 15:29 , Joe Maimon wrote:
>>>
>>> All I am advocating is that if ever another draft standard comes along to
>>> enable people to try and make something of it, lead follow or get out of
>>
6 matches
Mail list logo
