On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I'd like to update some material on nanog.cluepon.net (not very responsive
> to HTTP requests right now) and my account doesn't work anymore. I reached
> out to Richard S. but have not heard back from him - anyone else here who
> has admin acce
Does anyone beside Cisco do MAP? Brocade, Juniper, Huawei?
Thank you,
- Nich Warren
-Original Message-
From: Tore Anderson [mailto:t...@fud.no]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:15 AM
To: Baldur Norddahl
Cc: Nicholas Warren; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Greenfield 464XLAT (In January)
* Ba
Good Morning All,
I am not sure if this is the right place to ask this question or not, so here
it goes.
I am looking for someone that has experience programming a ZTE GPON OLT and
setting up some ONU profiles to go with it. I have just about everything
figured out except some issues with th
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:54 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> I think you've offered some really bad advice here Bill.
As I said, there are lots of people who _think_ it doesn’t work. And then
there are people who’ve actually done it, and know better.
Besides, you seem to not have read what I actua
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:54 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> I think you've offered some really bad advice here Bill.
>
> As I said, there are lots of people who _think_ it doesn’t work. And then
> there are people who’ve actually done it, and
> If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
> employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
> assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an
> IPv4-depleted world, he won't be doing anycast any time soon…
…which is one of the reasons why
>Uh huh. The numbers are clear: 99.99% of the time it works. The other
>0.01% of the time you're screwed and had better pray the user is one
>of the ones you can afford to lose.
>
>Unicast TCP breaks too, but it has the virtue of being fixable 100% of the
>time.
I love the wry humor on the nanog
William Herrin wrote:
> If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
> employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
> assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an
> IPv4-depleted world, he won't be doing anycast any time soon, even if
>
We are very excited to be holding the next NOTR event in the great city of
Herndon, VA next Tuesday, and we invite you to join us!
Are you interested in Internet networking/peering? Do you work at a colocation,
hosting or data center facility? Are you a provider of hardware/software
solutions f
Anyone on here from Unified Layer? Having an issue with a small ISP I help
out occasionally. Some of their IP Space can reach a hosted web server, but
their other prefixes cannot reach the destination. Traceroute from working
IP space to destination web server (a bank) :
15 162-144-240-55.un
> On Jun 16, 2015, at 12:49 , Masataka Ohta
> wrote:
>
> William Herrin wrote:
>
>> If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
>> employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
>> assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an
>> IPv4-
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 16, 2015, at 12:49 , Masataka Ohta
wrote:
William Herrin wrote:
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
assignment situation and the /24 announceme
On Jun 15, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
>
> I have a mail system where there are two MX hosts, one in the US and one in
> Europe. Both have a DNS MX record metric of 10 so a bastardized
> round-robin takes place. This does not work so well when one site goes
> down. My solution will b
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> It seems to be more of a last-mile backhoe fade issue right now. I'm
> trying to convince them that a manufacturing facility isn't a good place
> for a data center.
Backhoes seem to have gotten you for a day or so now. My mail to you
is defer
In message <82d10008-cb76-42c7-a78c-ee876924d...@pch.net>, Bill Woodcock writes:
>
> > If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or
> > employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4
> > assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an
> > IPv
Any luck on a DNS based solution?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> I have a mail system where there are two MX hosts, one in the US and one in
> Europe. Both have a DNS MX record metric of 10 so a bastardized
> round-robin takes place. This does not work so well when one
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rafael Possamai wrote:
> Any luck on a DNS based solution?
>
I'm looking into a F5 GTM solution based out of a colo we have in Europe to
direct SMTP between France and the US hubs. Now I just have to work layers
8 & 9.
Remember when users didn't expect sub-minu
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:07:22PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> "What about IPv6? We have a plan! We plan to be dead before customers
> >> demand IPv6".
> >> I am pretty sure the authors are still alive(?).
> >
> > and customer demand for ipv6 s
18 matches
Mail list logo
