RE: AOL Postmaster

Same here. I want to solve things that they seem to have issues with. But when I ask what is wrong they either don't respond (in any meaningful manner) or say that they 'solved it', without me ever knowing what 'it' was. I prefer swimming in seaweed instead of contacting Yahoo (or MS for that

Re: AOL Postmaster

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: > Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from > AOL. Quite annoying. I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from dmarc-h...@teamaol.com, which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues. Of course

Re: AOL Postmaster

block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification colin Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: >> Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from >> AOL. Quite a

Re: AOL Postmaster

And how many users do you have, again? On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, "Colin Johnston" wrote: > block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification > > colin > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0

Re: AOL Postmaster

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > And how many users do you have, again? So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for only the operations considered large enough? Good to know. ---rsk

Re: AOL Postmaster

On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:45:15 -0500, Rich Kulawiec said: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > And how many users do you have, again? > > So professionalism, competence, diligence, etc. are reserved for > only the operations considered large enough? Good to k

Re: Comcast Support (from NANOG Digest, Vol 84, Issue 23)

I thought you were just supposed to give your Geek License number. :-) #nothingScales - Original Message - > From: "Kevin McElearney" > To: "Peter Loron" , "John Brzozowski" > > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 9:16:37 AM > Subject: Re: Comcast Support (from NANOG

RE: Comcast Support (from NANOG Digest, Vol 84, Issue 23)

Ah, Comcast support. Those people who keep calling my Ford Motor Company phone, to threaten to shut off service to my home, which I don't have (I have uverse). They keep saying they will take my Ford number off the account (which of course, I don't know the account number because I don't have

Re: Comcast Support (from NANOG Digest, Vol 84, Issue 23)

​ On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote: > Ah, Comcast support. Those people who keep calling my Ford Motor Company > phone, to threaten to shut off service to my home, which I don't have (I > have uverse). They keep saying they will take my Ford number off the > account (w

Re: v6 deagg

> On Feb 19, 2015, at 21:25 , Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:16 PM, manning bill wrote: >> and then there are the loons who will locally push /64 or longer, some of >> which may leak. >> > > 2001:2b8:46:::/64 > ... a fairly extensive list actually > >> s

ControlNow / MailEssentials Admin Requested

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could a clueful ControlNow smtp admin contact me off-ist. RE: na0102.smtpout.com - -- Jason Hellenthal JJH48-ARIN -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU7LauAAoJEDLu+wRc4KcIMecIAI35ZHbTDyLWcSLtYkuM8oxP zvsDZhHtD5r3j0iUkhD0jDpEWS2F1wTkQwZ6

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

As one of the authors involved in what eventually became RFC6598, this isn’t entirely accurate. 100.64/10 is intended as space to be used by service providers for dealing with situations where additional shared private address space is required, but it must be distinct from the private address

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

Amazon is not the only public cloud. There are several public clouds that can support IPv6 directly. I have done some work for and believe these guys do a good job: Host Virtual (vr.org ) In no particular order and I have no relationship with or loyalty or benefit associated wi

routing issue? could someone from verizon FiOS please take a look?

Verizon Fios cannot connect me to lavra.spb.ru This is the Russian site of the second most important monastery in Russia. It is reachable from Boston avra.spb.ru (91.218.229.131), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 192.168.100.1 (192.168.100.1) 2.293 ms 0.815 ms 0.764 ms 2 100.64.0.129 (1

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

I have an unimpeachable source at AWS that assures me they're working hard to deploy IPv6. As it was explained to me, since AWS was sort of first to the table -- well before IPv6 "popped", they had designed everything on the v4 only. Granted, you can get an IPv6 ELB, but only in EC2 classic, whic

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

ADDENDUM: They're taking into consideration my suggestion of using IPv6 as a "universal" internal network so that the different regions could be interconnected without having to give up the region-independent use of 10.0.0.0/8, which I think would be an elegant solution. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1

Re: routing issue? could someone from verizon FiOS please take a look?

Hi, I actually saw this issue a few weeks back but with a customer's website. It's actually not a routing issue, but a DNS issue. If you check the IPs that Verizon resolves for you, they'll be different from the IPs that other resolvers will resolve. It's weird, I know, but that's all the info

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Blair Trosper wrote: > I have an unimpeachable source at AWS that assures me they're working hard > to deploy IPv6. As it was explained to me, since AWS was sort of first to > the table -- well before IPv6 "popped", they had designed everything on the > v4 only.

Re: v6 deagg

Hi Bill, > I don't fully understand the math yet but the algorithm doesn't smell > right. As near as I can figure it may only be correct in a static > system. If after convergence the disaggregate ceases to be reachable > from the aggregate, there doesn't appear to be either enough > information i

OT: VPS with Routed IP space

Anybody know of or have recommendations for providers of small VPS-line boxen (or alternative solutions) to serve as GRE endpoints? (for a small amount of IP addresses, /29 or /28 at most) I am finding a lot of places that will give you extra IPs on the box itself (oftentimes out of the provider's

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

I personally find it amusing that companies try to have it both ways. "We are huge, you should use us instead of $LITTLE_GUY because our resources & scale make us better able to handle things. Oh, what, you want IPv6? We're too big to do that quickly" But hey, I would try the same thing in

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

Shouldn't it be the other way around? Ipv6 as the unique universal external network and you can define your own IPv4 within your cloud context separate from the cloud provider network and from other customers. So if you have contexts in different region - you can interconnect using layer 3 or layer

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

That's sort of what I meant to say. I did not articulate it well. The problem *with* AWS is that in VPC (or different regions), the internal network space is unique to each region. So, in theory, I could get 10.1.2.3 in two regions on two instances. In VPC, you can also designate your own subne

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

You just need to enable proxy ARP on the box to simulate a routed subnet. Den 24/02/2015 19.25 skrev "Alex Buie" : > Anybody know of or have recommendations for providers of small > VPS-line boxen (or alternative solutions) to serve as GRE endpoints? > (for a small amount of IP addresses, /29 or

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

Or NOT. That’s a horribly ugly thing to do in a situation where the desired behavior shouldn’t be that hard to achieve. Owen > On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:07 , Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > You just need to enable proxy ARP on the box to simulate a routed subnet. > Den 24/02/2015 19.25 skrev "Alex Bui

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

How about VPS providers who will do BGP... Do they exist? On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > Or NOT. That’s a horribly ugly thing to do in a situation where the > desired behavior shouldn’t be that hard to achieve. > > Owen > > > On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:07 , Baldur Norddahl

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

On 02/24/2015 02:29 PM, Zachary Giles wrote: How about VPS providers who will do BGP... Do they exist? Hit and miss I find. We do it for the odd client and haven't really had any issues.

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

deploy two utm's with bgp on the two internal and external interfaces col Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Feb 2015, at 20:29, Zachary Giles wrote: > > > How about VPS providers who will do BGP... Do they exist? > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> Or NOT. That’s a

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

Same here, we do as well. But as per the OPs question: we will route additional space but you generally need a good reason for it. Regards, Tim Raphael > On 25 Feb 2015, at 4:38 am, Jeff Fisher wrote: > >> On 02/24/2015 02:29 PM, Zachary Giles wrote: >> >> How about VPS providers who will do

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/UserGuide/vpc-peering.html On 2/24/15 10:59 AM, Blair Trosper wrote: > In VPC, you can also designate > your own subnets, which makes things a little more tough a la > interconnecting the disparate regions. > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Luan Ngu

Quality of ROAs in RPKI repositories

Hi all, As part of my master thesis and research work at IIJ, I've created a page to monitor the "quality" of ROAs in all RIR's RPKI repositories. http://rpki.me/quality.html Overall, the ROAs are quite good. Of course there are problems: I found out some ROAs which are very likely to be mis-reg

RE: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

ARP Networks: https://www.arpnetworks.com/vps Routed IP space (v4 and v6) as well as BGP peering. > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Zachary > Giles > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:29 PM > To: Owen DeLong > Cc: NANOG > Subject: Re: OT: V

Re: AOL Postmaster

The quickest way of contacting the AOL Mail Team I'm aware of is through their Twitter account at @AOLMail (https://twitter.com/AOLMail). Tell them @6 sent you. ;) Cordially, A - ~~ vox: +1 202 459 9800 x.1300 // secure: +1 410 874 0050 (phone

Re: v6 deagg

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 21:25 , Christopher Morrow >> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:16 PM, manning bill wrote: >>> and then there are the loons who will locally push /64 or longer, some of >>> which may leak. >>> >> >> 2001:2b8:46

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

On 2/24/15 1:42 PM, Michael Helmeste wrote: ARP Networks: https://www.arpnetworks.com/vps Routed IP space (v4 and v6) as well as BGP peering. +1 for Arp, I'm a happy customer (no other affiliation). FWIW, Doug

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

Thanks to those who mailed off-list for the BGP thread-jack. Seems like those providers that do BGP would probably route their own space to VPS as well.. (Like OP want. if I understand correctly). Some of them even state that they even SWIP the addresses, which is positive. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at

Re: v6 deagg

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Sander Steffann wrote: > Bill Herrin said: >> I don't fully understand the math yet but the algorithm doesn't smell >> right. As near as I can figure it may only be correct in a static >> system. If after convergence the disaggregate ceases to be reachable >> from

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Alex Buie wrote: > Anybody know of or have recommendations for providers of small > VPS-line boxen (or alternative solutions) to serve as GRE endpoints? > (for a small amount of IP addresses, /29 or /28 at most) > > I am finding a lot of places that will give you e

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

> On Feb 24, 2015, at 7:45 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Alex Buie wrote: >> Anybody know of or have recommendations for providers of small >> VPS-line boxen (or alternative solutions) to serve as GRE endpoints? >> (for a small amount of IP addresses, /29 or /28

ARIN+NANOG On The Road

Thank you to all who put this event on! It was fun getting to meet everyone :) Eric Miller, CCNP Network Engineering Consultant (407) 257-5115

Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space

never saw that post. right up my alley. Thanks! On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 2015, at 7:45 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Alex Buie > wrote: > >> Anybody know of or have recommendations for providers of small > >> VPS

Re: AOL Postmaster

For anyone having issues with AOL right now, if you would like, contact me offlist and I will see what I can do about getting it in front of our contact at AOL. Please be as specific as you can be about the issue, about who controls the IPs, about your own role and authority over the IPs and th