FlowViewer version 4.4 (open-source) is now available on SourceForge.
FlowViewer provides a dynamic web front-end to two powerful open-source
netflow data collector and analyzers, flow-tools and SiLK. FlowViewer
provides the user with the ability to report, graph and track (MRTG-like)
user spec
I would cry for about 37 seconds if LinkedIn went down permanently. Then, get
over it and not worry about their spam. Signed up when they first started but
stopped using almost immediately when they kept requesting permission to access
my contacts.
matthew black
[Note: speaking only for myself
I took a picture of my wife for my her profile on my phone, and it ended up on
a profile they created for her. She has no idea what LinkedIn is, but she's got
a profile and a picture.
I wanted to like them, but they are simply douchebags. They give zero thought
to how their customer would want
Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was
surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do:
Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional
cost of $XXX/month. Please let me know if you would like to go ahead with
the service and I can creat
What did they say when you asked them(Akamai)?
I would imagine ipv6 to be included in price not an additional fee.
-Original Message-
From: "Aaron Hopkins"
Sent: 8/18/2014 9:38 AM
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?
Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service a
Hi Aaron,
> Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was
> surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do:
>
>> Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional
>> cost of $XXX/month. Please let me know if you would like to go ahead with
>> the
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Aaron Hopkins wrote:
> Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was
> surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do:
>
> Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional
>> cost of $XXX/month. Please let me kn
I meant to ask. Did you ask akamai why they would be charging for ipv6? Is
there any logical reason other than just wanting to make little more money,
that makes them have to charge for ipv6?
-Original Message-
From: "Aaron Hopkins"
Sent: 8/18/2014 9:53 AM
To: "Mehmet Akcin"
Cc: "
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
What did they say when you asked them(Akamai)?
I quoted their response in my mail; sorry if that wasn't clear. They
offered to enable IPv6 service for a non-trivial monthly recurring fee,
which they offered to send me a revised contract to include.
I
Luckily, there are a lot better CDNs out there with better features and
pricing :)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Aaron Hopkins wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
> What did they say when you asked them(Akamai)?
>>
>
> I quoted their response in my mail; sorry if that wasn
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
Just thinking aloud, they may justify it based on
the fact that many ISPs they have colocated
servers with do not support IPv6 yet, so they end
up having to send that traffic through more costly routes.
That argument is a bit hollow though - they
should be taking a leadership role in adopti
Is there an equivalent discount for not using IPv4 anymore? :)
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Hopkins
Sent: 2014 August 18, Mon 11:38
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Akamai charges for IPv6 suppor
http://www.christianforums.com/t3057187/
-Original Message-
From: ra...@psg.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 1:00 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Urgent
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
Which one?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of ra...@psg.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 1:00 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Urgent
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Aaron Hopkins wrote:
> Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was
> surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do:
>
>> Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional
>> cost of $XXX/month. Please let me kno
Just send your request to the all-gods well-known multicast group.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:20:48PM +, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote:
> Which one?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of ra...@psg.com
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 1:00 PM
> To:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Just send your request to the all-gods well-known multicast group.
224.6.6.6?
jms
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:20:48PM +, Kain, Rebecca (.) wrote:
Which one?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of ra
Aaron,
I’ll make sure someone follows up on your ticket. To help accelerate overall
IPv6 adoption, we stopped charging for new conversions to IPv6 over a year ago.
Probably just some misinformation in the sales force from the old policy...
Feel free to reach out directly to me if you end up n
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 19:54 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> Just send your request to the all-gods well-known multicast group.
Doesn't work with IPv6. All IPv6 multicast addresses start with FF and
it's a well-known fact that God is ineffable.
Regards, K.
--
~~
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, wrote:
> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>
>
Per Michael Valentine Smith 127.0.0.1 should work.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>> -Original Message-
>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -AS666 NOC
--
ASN 666 is the US army. I was curious a long time
ago and looked it up... ;-)
scott
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, wrote:
> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>
> Regards,
> -AS666 NOC
>
>
And this is why we're going to have the
"always remember to lock your screen
before stepping way from your computer"
tutorial at the next member's breakfast...
Matt
On 08/18/2014 12:13 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 19:54 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Just send your request to the all-gods well-known multicast group.
Doesn't work with IPv6. All IPv6 multicast addresses start with FF and
it's a well-known fact that God is ineffable.
HAHAHAHAHA.
Per Michael Valentine Smith 127.0.0.1 should work.
This also has the benefit of working over IPv6 (::1) without violating
the ineffibility Karl referred to.
Although, technically, since many gods are omnipresent, shouldn't you
just be able to send the packet to any address and it will be
Scott Weeks wrote:
-Original Message-
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
--
ASN 666 is the US army. I was curious a long time
ago and looked it up... ;-)
scott
OP is a troll, best to ignore and block:
Re
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Noam Freedman wrote:
I'll make sure someone follows up on your ticket. To help accelerate
overall IPv6 adoption, we stopped charging for new conversions to IPv6
over a year ago. Probably just some misinformation in the sales force
from the old policy...
Oh, I hadn't expe
On 8/18/2014 12:00, ra...@psg.com wrote:
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
This is one where YOU have to initiate the contact--response is certain
but response content may be other-than-hoped-for.
--
The unique Characteristics of System Administrators:
All kidding aside, did someone contact the OP off-list to get him the
help he needs?
Richard
Op is funny. Best to laugh and smile.
On 19/08/2014 6:43 AM, "Jeroen van Aart" wrote:
> Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>>
>> -Original Message-
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
>>> --
>>
>>
>> ASN 666
Le 18/08/2014 20:38, Jeroen van Aart a écrit :
> Scott Weeks wrote:
>>
-Original Message-
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
Regards,
-AS666 NOC
>> --
>>
>>
>> ASN 666 is the US army. I was curious a long time ago
--As of August 18, 2014 3:44:09 PM +, Warren Bailey is alleged to have
said:
I took a picture of my wife for my her profile on my phone, and it ended
up on a profile they created for her. She has no idea what LinkedIn is,
but she's got a profile and a picture.
I wanted to like them, but th
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:00:29 +0200, ra...@psg.com said:
> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
They never want to talk to you unless you have proof of a support contract,
and calling them to deal with an issue with one of their customers is futile...
pgp1cpGC6lpH4.pgp
Description: PG
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:00:29 +0200, ra...@psg.com said:
>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
> They never want to talk to you unless you have proof of a support
> contract, and calling them to deal with an issue with one of their
> customers is futile...
the request message was a
>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
> And this is why we're going to have the
> "always remember to lock your screen
> before stepping way from your computer"
> tutorial at the next member's breakfast...
a - the forge was not done from my screen
b - my screen locks itself damned qu
On 08/18/2014 12:57 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le 18/08/2014 20:38, Jeroen van Aart a écrit :
OP is a troll,
Sure? :-)
I drew that conclusion considering normally the emails coming from that
address have a different origin (thus coming from a different person),
i.e. coming from psg.com
On Aug 18, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> the request message was a forge, see below. damned shame i did not
> think of it, though. otoh, i consider the contact requests useful.
You just blew an opportunity to get on every north american late night talk
show.
Oh ... (sorry)
signatu
I don't claim to be a prophet, but
https://twitter.com/TheTweetOfGod
...Todd
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, wrote:
> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>
> Regards,
> -AS666 NOC
--
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
If you want them to
On Aug 18, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>> And this is why we're going to have the
>> "always remember to lock your screen
>> before stepping way from your computer"
>> tutorial at the next member's breakfast...
>
> a - the forge was n
If only we had origin and path-based routing…
-b
On Aug 18, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>>> And this is why we're going to have the
>>> "always remember to lock your screen
>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
>
> And this is why we're going to have the
> "always remember to lock your screen
> before stepping way from your computer"
> tutorial at
El 8/18/2014 12:23 PM, Aaron Hopkins escribió:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
>> What did they say when you asked them(Akamai)?
>
> I quoted their response in my mail; sorry if that wasn't clear. They
> offered to enable IPv6 service for a non-trivial monthly recurring fee,
> whi
I guess you expect infrastructure to build itself for free?
Matthew Kaufman
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 18, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Alejandro Acosta
> wrote:
>
>
>
> El 8/18/2014 12:23 PM, Aaron Hopkins escribió:
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>>
>>> What did they say when you asked
In message <63bf75be-4e53-4e17-a67a-6d5ada633...@matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman
writes:
> I guess you expect infrastructure to build itself for free?
>
> Matthew Kaufman
No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4
is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
--
Mark Andr
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4
is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
Based on a response I saw in this thread earlier today, it sounds like
IPv6 support is no longer a separate charge from Akamai. Perhaps th
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Justin M. Streiner <
strei...@cluebyfour.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4
>> is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
>>
>
> Based on a response I saw in this thread
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
Or they did get the memo, but realised that no sale == no commission.
If they got the memo and chose to ignore it, then that gives me all the
ammunition I need to hit them with the biggest cluebat I have, and squeeze
them for a discount for the inconve
47 matches
Mail list logo
