> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Irwin, Kevin
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:39 PM
> I¹m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already,
> especially
> on the 9K¹s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it comes to the
> 512K limit.
I would ac
On May 9, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Vitkovský Adam wrote:
> With 6500/7600 I can understand they've been around for ages and no one
> anticipated the 512k limit back then.
Actually, it *was* anticipated. It's just that those who designed the ASIC
didn't necessarily envision that it would still be i
On 8 May 2014 17:30, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
> I would love to see the EdgeRouter Lite, or something similar with 2 SFP
> ports and 2 1000bT ports (Which would fit with the OP's question). Q-in-Q
> tunneling and basic routing required, but not much else for me. Bonus
> points points for somethin
Hi Jeff – I noticed the question posed here so thought I’d respond, perhaps at
risk of stirring up a hornet’s nest given how long the last thread was. ;-)
Anyway… there’s no congestion between Comcast and Level 3 connections, and
we’re working collaboratively with Level 3. Given these facts, we
On 9 May 2014 12:05, Aled Morris wrote:
> Indeed. Mikrotik are promising a CCR1009 with 2xSFP and 8xUTP GE ports
> (and dual PSU) for $425 but it isn't an access switch (so no Q-in-Q) though
> it does support MPLS/VPLS.
>
Apologies for correcting myself, but I just checked and Q-in-Q is support
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
This report has been generated at Fri May 9 21:13:53 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 01-May-14 -to- 08-May-14 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS982979697 4.2% 87.4 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone,IN
2 - AS23752
w00 h00! We did it!!
Is this excellent or what? We dipped below half a million again! I am impressed.
Keep up the good work, everyone.
Party in Bellevue if we can keep it below 500K until then!
--
TTFN,
patrick
> On May 9, 2014, at 18:00, cidr-rep...@potaroo.net wrote:
>
> This report has b
Anyway… there’s no congestion between Comcast and Level 3 connections, and
we’re working collaboratively with Level 3. Given these facts, we have no
reason to believe that Comcast is on their list.
Sure, because Level 3 is already paying Comcast to deliver traffic to your
paying customers, ri
ROFLMAO — Party in Bellevue is more than likely to push it back up over 500K
again, isn’t it?
Sounds like a Dish commercial… (James Earl Jones voice):
When you put a bunch of network engineers in a party in Bellevue, you get a
bunch of drunk network engineers.
When you get drunk network enginee
--- o...@delong.com wrote:
From: Owen DeLong
Don’t let network engineers party in Bellevue.
-
Yeah, let me know how that works out... :-)
scott
If the whole thing breaks, I'm taking a vacation.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 8:52 PM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: The Cidr Report
ROFLMAO Party in Bellevue is more
13 matches
Mail list logo
